Tom Ritter wrote
Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:06:55 -0500:
> The good news is that my bwauth measured you at 75600, which is a bit
> below the other two measurements, but in line with them. So once
> maatuska starts voting on this data you'll be popped back up.
maatuska is now voting on bandwidth measure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/16/2017 10:06 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:
> That is because gabelmoo's bwauth dropped off. Now there are only 3
> bwauths in the system, and your relay was not measured by one of them
> (faravahar). With only 2 measurements, you get kicked down to th
That is because gabelmoo's bwauth dropped off. Now there are only 3
bwauths in the system, and your relay was not measured by one of them
(faravahar). With only 2 measurements, you get kicked down to the
default I believe.
The good news is that my bwauth measured you at 75600, which is a bit
below
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/14/2017 11:22 PM, Tom Ritter wrote:
> But I wanted to announce it here, both to give an update, and let the
> community take a look at its output and see if anything looks fishy.
Since few hours the BW is dropped or my exit relay from about 90
After suffering the loss of maatuska's bwauth several months ago, we
have re-provisioned it thanks to the gracious help from
https://coldhak.ca/
It has completed an initial scan of the network[0] and is reporting
its data here: http://198.51.75.50/bwauth/bwscan.V3BandwidthsFile
This week I intend
