Thanks for your input, Tim.
You are correct that I have not taken into account the IPs which are not in
the consensus.
My exit nodes are regularly attacked -- what caught my attention was not
the fact that an extra gigabit of traffic was flowing in, but rather the
way it was (*and still is*, on o
> On 22 Jul 2017, at 08:00, Matt Traudt wrote:
>
> Now, to my observations and the post that was referred to:
>
> /I clearly failed to clarify/ that the "suspicious" traffic which caught
> my interest was about non-Tor IPs entering the network through my exits.
How do you work out what a non-T
On 7/21/17 12:56, Matt Traudt wrote:
> [This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they appear
> to be. Learn about spoofing at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofing]
>
> On 7/21/17 12:12, 0dayshoppingsp...@tutanota.com wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> A few users have detected suspicious
On 7/21/17 12:12, 0dayshoppingsp...@tutanota.com wrote:
> Hello
>
> A few users have detected suspicious activity around certain Relays in
> the network. There could be Time Confirmation Attacks happening
> currently on the Live Tor Network.
>
> If any Tor dev see this, Please Start Checking Th
Hello
A few users have detected suspicious activity around certain Relays in the
network. There could be Time Confirmation Attacks happening currently on the
Live Tor Network.
If any Tor dev see this, Please Start Checking The US Relays in the network.
--
Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim you
