Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

2017-01-08 Thread Thomas Maurice
Hello of course I read the documentation before asking, I do not want to make useless noise on this channel. I'll try Roman's solution! On 01/07/2017 08:30 PM, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 01/07/2017 08:00 PM, Efthimis Iosifdis wrote: > >> You may also have a look at this article if it helps and

Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

2017-01-07 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/07/2017 08:00 PM, Efthimis Iosifdis wrote: > > You may also have a look at this article if it helps and in case this is > a new Tor Relay node: > > https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay /me wonders if this link should be

Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

2017-01-07 Thread Efthimis Iosifdis
Hello Thomas. You may also have a look at this article if it helps and in case this is a new Tor Relay node: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay Cheers, Dr Ciphers On Sat, 07 Jan 2017 17:55:12 +0200 Thomas Maurice wrote Hello

Re: [tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

2017-01-07 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:55:12 +0100 Thomas Maurice wrote: > It is supposed to be caped at 20MBps, and 25MBps burst so I doubt the > limitation I am observing is enforced by the node itself. You mean traffic limitation in torrc? Remove it. There is no reason to apply bandwidth caps unless you want

[tor-relays] TOR Relay performance issue

2017-01-07 Thread Thomas Maurice
Hello all ! o/ It seems I am running into a performance issue with my relay, and I am not able to troubleshoot it, so I hope someone could point out something obvious I am missing! (for information, the relay is a 2vCPU, 2G RAM VM running on Scaleway) From what I observe from the graphs, my maxi

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Performance

2014-03-25 Thread irregulator
On 03/25/2014 04:29 AM, Sebastian Hahn wrote: > > On 24 Mar 2014, at 20:21, tor-admin wrote: > >> There a couple of sysctrl parameters that Moritz described here: >> https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server#sysctlconf > > That website has at least one glaringly dangerous suggestion, namely

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Performance

2014-03-25 Thread Moritz Bartl
On 03/25/2014 03:29 AM, Sebastian Hahn wrote: > That website has at least one glaringly dangerous suggestion, namely > apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keys.gnupg.net 886DDD89 I agree. That is coming from https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html.en btw :) -- Moritz Bartl https://www.torser

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Performance

2014-03-24 Thread Sebastian Hahn
On 24 Mar 2014, at 20:21, tor-admin wrote: > There a couple of sysctrl parameters that Moritz described here: > https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server#sysctlconf That website has at least one glaringly dangerous suggestion, namely apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keys.gnupg.net 886DD

Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Performance

2014-03-24 Thread tor-admin
There a couple of sysctrl parameters that Moritz described here: https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server#sysctlconf Without setting them my relays were not able to handle really large numbers of concurrent connections. Regards, torland On Monday 24 March 2014 20:02:15 Sebastian Urbach w

[tor-relays] Tor Relay Performance

2014-03-24 Thread Sebastian Urbach
Hi, Everytime i speak with colleagues i wonder that the most performance related options for TOR relays are unknown. I just started to write down what i know and i would be happy if someone else could benefit from that. http://key-server.org -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Sincerely yours S