Thank you all for replying,
I will answer the notification with the template mentioned by Rejo and
include the link for ExoneraTor recommended by Jon.
Best Regards,
Tanous
2017-10-04 11:34 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Proulx :
> Here's my version of the same:
>
> Hello,
>
> The source address 128.52.128.
Here's my version of the same:
Hello,
The source address 128.52.128.105 is a Tor exit node, and is not the
origin point for the traffic in question. See
http://tor-exit.csail.mit.edu (which is the host in your logs) for
details. Any action taken on this node would simply result in the
problem t
Hey,
Yes, I do more or less the same. If the complaint is sent using some automated
system, I "do nothing." If the complaint is sent by a human, I'll answer them
with a template, see below. If there is a followup response to that, I'll do
some more explaining, oftentimes pointing them at the bl
> On 3 Oct 2017, at 22:35, tanous .c wrote:
>
> Have any of you had this sort of problem? I'm having difficulty determining
> if this log information represents a normal exit relay ocurrence or if my
> server has been compromised... What could i do in order to solve this?
Yes, Profihost sent
Hi,
I have been running one tor exit relay for about 51 days and i recently
got this abuse
report:
Good afternoon,
Your Ip address (212.47.239.73) has been reported to us by profihost
because it seems to have attempted to bruteforce.
Thank you to take the necessary action as soon as possible.
