sts.torproject.org
>>> Subject: [tor-relays] Question on running bridge nodes
>>> Message-ID: <49c1abc0aa88e1bf8425fdc8e4824...@nodataavailable.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>>> Hi,
>>> I've set up a bridge
t 2014 23:25:47 +0100
From: Tor externet co uk
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-relays] Question on running bridge nodes
Message-ID: <49c1abc0aa88e1bf8425fdc8e4824...@nodataavailable.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Hi,
I've set up a bridg
On 12 Oct 2014, at 09:32 , tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 23:25:47 +0100
> From: Tor externet co uk
> To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: [tor-relays] Question on running bridge nodes
> Message-ID: <49c1abc0aa8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On October 11, 2014 3:25:47 PM PDT, Tor externet co uk
wrote:
> I wondered whether it was more helpful to the Tor network as a whole to
> have have a very fast node which hibernated every 12-15 hours, or if I
> throttled Tor traffic, so that the n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On October 11, 2014 3:25:47 PM PDT, Tor externet co uk
wrote:
> I wondered whether it was more helpful to the Tor network as a whole to
> have have a very fast node which hibernated every 12-15 hours, or if I
> throttled Tor traffic, so that the n
Hi,
I've set up a bridge node in the previous few weeks, but have had to put
a bandwidth limit on, as I only have 10TB of traffic per month before my
ISP will start throttling me to 100k/sec.
I wondered whether it was more helpful to the Tor network as a whole to
have have a very fast node w
