Re: [tor-relays] New relay questions

Hi, First thanks for operating a new relay and welcome 😀 > The logs report success and the Relay Search shows my relay (Nickname: > code9nRelay) running but the advertised bandwidth is 0 B/s. > It’s been running for 13 hours or so and I see a new relay that has been > running for 1 hour has an

Re: [tor-relays] New relay questions

Hi, Pete, won't have too much answers (and maybe the bandwith settings from your torrc-file would help). Did you set RelayBandwithRate or "only" BandwithRate? Reloading torrc-settings is better made via pkill -sighup tor since it does not restart the service (disconnecting everyone in the pr

[tor-relays] New relay questions

Hi Relay Operators, I am trying to run a non exit relay for the first time and have some questions: FYI, I have 2 virtual CPU s and 1.256 GB RAM with ‘unlimited’ bandwidth on a rented VPS running Debian 11. The logs report success and the Relay Search shows my relay (Nickname: code9nRelay) run

Re: [tor-relays] New relay has a problem - Additional info about net config

Hey Olaf, I'd try the following: - restart tor - restart whole server - try setting: Address 107.189.14.123 in torrc. I have no experience with nyx and if it displays logs from tor or if some unicorns are in between, so maybe take a look if the logs written by tor itself differ from the nyx

[tor-relays] New relay has a problem - Additional info about net config

Here info about netconfig. In the INFO messages is a part of 'Could not get local interface IP address." A mystical thing. root@localhost:~# ip a 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1

[tor-relays] New relay has a problem - Re-used IP blocked in consensus?

Hello Tor community! I have some identical new relays, but only one of them has a problem. My intention was an IPv6 problem, so there ist IPV6 diabled at all. Fingerprint: 3F1AE2170CAD31B5694BD9052A2A29E5793BDC1F IP: 107.189.14.123 Ports open: 22, 80, 9001 Test from outside by scanner: ok UFW

Re: [tor-relays] New relay

I'll increase it. I have two running from home, so I don't want to eat up too much bandwidth, but I left the config at the default rate until certain it was working. :) William Pate willp...@pm.me 512-947-3311 inadequate.net ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, March 27, 2020 5:09 AM, te

Re: [tor-relays] New relay

Thanks! Looks like a small bandwidth rate, did you really mean 300 kilobytes per second? T -- teor -- > On 26 Mar 2020, at 04:59, William Pate wrote: > >  > Set up another relay (this time on Raspberry Pi 4): > https://me

[tor-relays] New relay

Set up another relay (this time on Raspberry Pi 4): https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/BD187CF1B44A84EC7DD1BC2AC9C4F7DE23D16619 William Pate willp...@pm.me 512-947-3311 inadequate.net___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.or

Re: [tor-relays] New relay on dynamic IP address

Hi, > On 21 Feb 2020, at 20:21, Mario Costa wrote: > > Just reporting back after some time. Today I noticed that my relay running > at home with a dynamic IP got a guard flag again. So it’s totally possible > for a relay to become a guard even after the authorities notice that it has a > dyn

Re: [tor-relays] New relay on dynamic IP address

Just reporting back after some time. Today I noticed that my relay running at home with a dynamic IP got a guard flag again. So it’s totally possible for a relay to become a guard even after the authorities notice that it has a dynamic IP address.It must be noted though that the IP address didn’

Re: [tor-relays] New relay on dynamic IP address

Torix, This is really useful. I forced an IP change and the relay lost the guardian flag. I guess that now the authorities know that it’s running on a dynamic IP connection and won’t assign a guard flag anymore. I was really surprised when the relay became a guard in about a week of uptime. By

Re: [tor-relays] New relay on dynamic IP address

That is exactly what will happen you will become a normal middle relay Thanks, John Csuti ‭(216) 236-3309‬ https://www.coolcomputers.info/ > On Jan 27, 2020, at 8:18 AM, Mario Costa wrote: > > Thanks Jonathan, mpan and John. > > I still don’t understand what happens when the authorities see

Re: [tor-relays] New relay on dynamic IP address

Dear Mario, In almost 2 years I've been running a middle relay from home, I have had about 15 ip changes. One time they came and replaced my equipment and it was down about 5 hours. It started back up with about 6 connections, but was back at a full 3000 in a few hours. I've never had a guar

Re: [tor-relays] New relay on dynamic IP address

Thanks Jonathan, mpan and John. I still don’t understand what happens when the authorities see that my IP is dynamic. Will they prevent the relay from becoming a guard? I didn’t know about the DoS problem, that’s something I didn’t experience yet with my other, older relay. Maybe not being and

Re: [tor-relays] New relay on dynamic IP address

Hey David, I don’t have unattended upgrades enabled since it’s a server I regularly access for other purposes, but I don’t see how this relates to a guardian relay running with a dynamic IP. Maybe you replied to the wrong message? :) -m > Il giorno 25 gen 2020, alle ore 02:04, David Poulsen

Re: [tor-relays] New relay on dynamic IP address

The stable flag refers to your fingerprint being up for long lived circuits. Being on a dynamic up won’t change that. So in principle the stable flag means that the server is up and reach able for most of the time no matter what the address or IP may be. Thanks, John Csuti > On Jan 26, 2020, a

Re: [tor-relays] New relay on dynamic IP address

> Is a really with a dynamic IP address useful at all? I’m running a node like that for over 5 years. Currently it is a guard too. The IP address is relatively stable and the major interruptions are due to kernel/tor upgrades or modem losing connection without the address change. Even after those

Re: [tor-relays] New relay on dynamic IP address

hi m, did you use the docs about Part 3: https://community.torproject.org/relay/setup/guard/debianubuntu/updates/ 3. Automatically reboot If you want to automatically reboot add the following at the the end of the file /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades: Unattended-Upgrade::Automati

Re: [tor-relays] New relay on dynamic IP address

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 03:19:52PM +0100, Mario Costa wrote: > Also, I’m wondering what will happen when the dynamic IP changes. Sooner or > later I’ll have a power outage or restart the modem. Last time my IP changed > it happened overnight for no evident reason. Will this relay lose its flags?

[tor-relays] New relay on dynamic IP address

Hello, I started a new relay at home. I was really surprised to see it gain a Guard flag in about a week since it first came online. My first relay (on a VPS) became a Guard well over a month after I set it up. How can I assess what was different this time? Also, I’m wondering what will happen

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay by the Chaos Computer Club Vienna (C3W)

Awesome, thanks for yet another relay! :-) > On Jan 23, 2020, at 05:38, MacLemon wrote: > > Hi! > > I just wanted to convey some happy news: > > The Chaos Computer Club Vienna[0] (C3W, Vienna/Austria) just launched their > second relay. We're still working on tweaking the bandwidth announcem

[tor-relays] New Relay by the Chaos Computer Club Vienna (C3W)

Hi! I just wanted to convey some happy news: The Chaos Computer Club Vienna[0] (C3W, Vienna/Austria) just launched their second relay. We're still working on tweaking the bandwidth announcements. Of course feedback to our relay setup is highly welcome and if you have questions, I'm happy to an

Re: [tor-relays] New relay in USA: bridge or middle relay?

Hi, > On 31 Oct 2019, at 10:04, ECAN - Matt Westfall wrote: > > hah, mine is -=severely=- under utilized.. > > NO CPU Load: https://puu.sh/EyX6N/81a5d5c76e.png > > 4 Mbps of throughput 2 Mbps each way or only ~ 20Mbps ea way: > https://puu.sh/EyX7F/b7885ce635.png > > Plenty of bandwidth:

Re: [tor-relays] New relay in USA: bridge or middle relay?

Everything Computers and Networks 804.592.1672 -- Original Message -- From: "teor" To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Sent: 10/22/2019 4:53:25 AM Subject: Re: [tor-relays] New relay in USA: bridge or middle relay? Hi, On 8 Oct 2019, at 22:07, Isaac Grover, Aileron I.T. wr

Re: [tor-relays] New relay in USA: bridge or middle relay?

Hi, > On 8 Oct 2019, at 22:07, Isaac Grover, Aileron I.T. > wrote: > > Good morning from Wisconsin, > > After reading about how middle relays in the USA go largely underutilized, > and having quietly run my own middle relay for several years, would it be > more beneficial to the network to l

[tor-relays] New relay in USA: bridge or middle relay?

Good morning from Wisconsin, After reading about how middle relays in the USA go largely underutilized, and having quietly run my own middle relay for several years, would it be more beneficial to the network to launch several new bridges instead of more middle relays? Make your day great, Isa

[tor-relays] New Relay: ShawnWebb01

Hey all, A few days ago, I put up a new relay on a PC Engines device running HardenedBSD 13-CURRENt/amd64: https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/57869F7458002476F6AC78F7A61C960CBA94497F I should update ContactInfo soon to reflect the ContactInfo format nusenu would like relays to use.

Re: [tor-relays] New relay operator here

Can you elaborate on the bandwidth issues? If it had anything to do with the host, please add a note to the GoodBadISPs page[0]. [0] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs alkyl privatesociety Tor: > Thanks for your answers and the kind words! One relay had to be cancelled

Re: [tor-relays] New relay operator here

Thanks for your answers and the kind words! One relay had to be cancelled because of bandwith issues, but five are still a nice number. Maybe the UK one will be replaced by an NL dedicated server with 100 mbit uplink. All servers are then also IPv6 compatible (four are already since today). :) Col

Re: [tor-relays] New relay operator here

Hi Privatesociety, Thank you for setting up these relays and contributing to the Tor network! I look forward to working with you in the future. In the #tor-relays IRC channel, there are a number of TorServers people, as well as people from partner organizations. There are also a number of us on

Re: [tor-relays] New relay operator here

Hi privatesociety, thanks for spreading your relays across multiple countries and ASes. privatesociety Tor: > Anyway: We are maybe setting up an exit in the future, but for this we‘d > like to join forces with other exit operators like TORSERVERS.net to have > better connections in case of proble

[tor-relays] New relay operator here

Hello tor relay community! I‘d like to introduce six new relays, which are operated by privatesociety, a community of people, which fighting for privacy based in europe. The six relays provide a capacity of around 300 mbit/s (total) and are hosted on networks, which aren‘t much used - so better for

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay

On 19 Feb 2018, at 03:41, Gary wrote: >> Right now I only see 2 on jaffacakemonster2 and 1 on jaffacakemonster. >> Seeing 3 would be weird, because in order for a pair of relays to be in >> the same family, they must both list each other in their torrcs. > > My family thing has settled now, I t

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 04:41:42PM +, Gary wrote: > My 2nd relay has a dirport set, 9030, it does not seem to be listed as a > dir authority yet, is this again because of the new relay thing (wait a few > weeks for it to be measured)? Two answers: (1) If you set AccountingMax, or if you have

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay

Hi thanks for getting back to me. > Right now I only see 2 on jaffacakemonster2 and 1 on jaffacakemonster. > Seeing 3 would be weird, because in order for a pair of relays to be in > the same family, they must both list each other in their torrcs. > My family thing has settled now, I think this

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay

Matt Traudt: > It's 0 because you're a new relay and haven't been measured yet. The advertised bandwidth is not 0 because this is an unmeasured relay, most unmeasured relays have a non-zerro adv. bw. example: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/773E813FDDBFC985B3D436CF669B572601C00FC3 Only t

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay

nusenu: >> . My family on Atlas - the little numbers in brackets are not all the >> same, I only run two relays, however on the listings it reports sometimes >> two sometimes three. Are you meant to include "yourself" in the torrc or >> only other relays?? > > recently I reported a bug in that p

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay

> . My family on Atlas - the little numbers in brackets are not all the > same, I only run two relays, however on the listings it reports sometimes > two sometimes three. Are you meant to include "yourself" in the torrc or > only other relays?? recently I reported a bug in that part of atlas which

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay

On 2/16/18 08:11, Gary wrote: > Hello. > > I recently set up a new relay, jaffacakemonster2, I would be grateful if > someone could answer some questions for me. > > 1. The bandwidth on Atlas is listed as "0". Is this a wait a few > days/new relay issue or a configuration issue. I was surprised t

[tor-relays] New Relay

Hello. I recently set up a new relay, jaffacakemonster2, I would be grateful if someone could answer some questions for me. 1. The bandwidth on Atlas is listed as "0". Is this a wait a few days/new relay issue or a configuration issue. I was surprised to find exit relays are default now, I hope I

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

> Speaking of which, I do wonder what the thoughts are on this idea. I > would like to have two derivatives of the cloud package, one for > novices and one for those who do not consider themselves novices. The > novice package will be centrally managed by Puppet, so all the user > has to do is spin

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

Conrad Rockenhaus: > I noticed this when I started it up. It appears that the version of > Tor on EPEL is out of date. I’ll build it out of source to fix it. > I’ll probably have to do that for the Cloud solution as well since > the lifecycle of EPEL is normally behind. 0.2.9.14 reached stable ~

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

> On 22 Dec 2017, at 21:08, Gary Smith wrote: > > Hello. > > I use AWS to test the alpha release, on the free tier. If you dont mind me > asking, I am interested to know what you are doing to avoid a bill Amazon > bill at the end of the month. > > I think I had about 30GB data transfer or so

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

Hello. I use AWS to test the alpha release, on the free tier. If you dont mind me asking, I am interested to know what you are doing to avoid a bill Amazon bill at the end of the month. I think I had about 30GB data transfer or so & a few other things and they sent me a bill for USD 0.70 ish (not

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

> On Dec 20, 2017, at 5:01 AM, teor wrote: > > > On 20 Dec 2017, at 20:59, Conrad Rockenhaus > wrote: > >> ConradsAWSRelay was started back up on a new AWS instance running Amazon >> Linux and it’s hash is now 9F7F05699131E1E2A22F70B83E8CBB4671F5FEE2. I have >

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

> On 20 Dec 2017, at 22:01, teor wrote: > > Does AWS have native IPv6 yet? It does, and if you created the right instance type (and created it recently) it's automatic: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/aws-ipv6-update-global-support-spanning-15-regions-multiple-aws-services/ > If so, please s

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

> On 20 Dec 2017, at 20:59, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: > > ConradsAWSRelay was started back up on a new AWS instance running Amazon > Linux and it’s hash is now 9F7F05699131E1E2A22F70B83E8CBB4671F5FEE2. I have > upgraded to Tor 0.3.1.9…. I had issues with getting the libevent development > head

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

Hello, ConradsAWSRelay was started back up on a new AWS instance running Amazon Linux and it’s hash is now 9F7F05699131E1E2A22F70B83E8CBB4671F5FEE2. I have upgraded to Tor 0.3.1.9…. I had issues with getting the libevent development header dependencies resolved on Amazon Linux so I just compile

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

> On Dec 19, 2017, at 8:55 PM, teor wrote: > > > On 20 Dec 2017, at 13:28, Conrad Rockenhaus > wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> Early this morning (3 AM CST) I brought a non-exit relay named >> “ConradsAWSRelay” online. I would appreciate it if someone would take an

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

> On 20 Dec 2017, at 13:28, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote: > > Howdy, > > Early this morning (3 AM CST) I brought a non-exit relay named > “ConradsAWSRelay” online. I would appreciate it if someone would take an > objective look at it to see if the relay is fast enough and bringing useful > servic

[tor-relays] New Relay Online/Working on AWS Cloud Torproject

Howdy, Early this morning (3 AM CST) I brought a non-exit relay named “ConradsAWSRelay” online. I would appreciate it if someone would take an objective look at it to see if the relay is fast enough and bringing useful services to the tor network. Additionally, I know that people have been wor

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Operator: Hostname

Sebastian, Thanks for this, indeed it would appear the VM is running in OVH data centers. However, I do not have a service agreement with OVH and thus I believe _I_ am not breaking one. My service agreement is with "pulseservers.com", a small provider who is fully aware that I am running an exit

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Operator: Hostname

Hi! Is it running at OVH? They don't allow running any kind of anonymizing services on their VPS or dedicated servers, as written in their terms and conditions ?! -- Sebastian > Am 21.02.2017 um 06:16 schrieb co...@awakening.io: > > Hello! > > I have just started up a new exit node using nu

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay Operator: Hostname

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 21:16:38 -0800 co...@awakening.io wrote: > I would like the hostname to be public, I wonder if I have misconfigured > as the hostname does not display here: > > https://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=b0a8f23372309d3589e70bd3c2e48c5b6fc3ec36 > > I have the followi

[tor-relays] New Relay Operator: Hostname

Hello! I have just started up a new exit node using nusenu's wonderful Ansible scripts (thank you kindly). I would like the hostname to be public, I wonder if I have misconfigured as the hostname does not display here: https://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=b0a8f23372309d3589e70bd3c

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> On 31 Aug 2016, at 15:20, Chad MILLER wrote: > > But it can never look in your ~/.gnupg/ dir or grab your scanner or wipe your > yubikey or turn on your camera or whatever, as another program, rogue or > compromised, could do. None of that even seems to exist. If it shares physical RAM with

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

* Green Dream [2016-08-30 21:39:34 -0700]: chad> 1) anyone can create packages for others without review, 2) security is better These two concepts seem fundamentally at odds. Perhaps I have misunderstood you. How would unreviewed code be better for security? Good question. It's better beca

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

Chad, > 1) anyone can create packages for others without review, 2) security is better These two concepts seem fundamentally at odds. Perhaps I have misunderstood you. How would unreviewed code be better for security? ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-rel

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

News: Package is at Tor 0.2.8.7, which was released yesterday. * Roger Dingledine [2016-08-25 00:33:14 -0400]: Nice idea! Other people here have very valid points about the security and maintability side of things, but I'll add another point: It looks like the conservative defaults you mentio

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:47:56AM -0400, Chad MILLER wrote: > I made a tor-middle-relay package, so the TVs, Wifi Routers, > Toasters, Self-driving Cars, Phones... of the world that are running > that new kind of Ubuntu (or other OS that implements this package > system!) can also help the Tor net

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> Ubuntu/Debian doesn't have the latest version of Tor. You should use the > official repository: https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html.en I already use this repo for all my relays :) <3, -- Aeris Individual crypto-terrorist group self-radicalized on the digital Internet https://imirhil.fr

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> Currently not on Xenial and Jessie (even in backport). >< Don’t match 2.8.6 too : snap ba16ce2958119a238d7931e709f30e932938218f ubuntu yakkety tor_0.2.8.6-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb 5839f7b8bdc74cc26c829452d458d5c797ff3666 official tor tor_0.2.8.6-3_amd64.deb 6f2f4118b6942088202

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

Ubuntu/Debian doesn't have the latest version of Tor. You should use the official repository: https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html.en On Aug 24, 2016 12:50 PM, "Aeris" wrote: > > Aeris, I should be worried if any of those matched. Did you know 0.2.8 is > > out? > > Currently not on Xenial

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> Aeris, I should be worried if any of those matched. Did you know 0.2.8 is > out? Currently not on Xenial and Jessie (even in backport). >< <3, -- Aeris Individual crypto-terrorist group self-radicalized on the digital Internet https://imirhil.fr/ Protect your privacy, encrypt your communicati

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

* Aeris [2016-08-24 19:25:31 +0200]: much less an untrusted tor package For information, the tor binary inside the snap doesn’t match any official upstream I can find… SHA1 Snap ba16ce2958119a238d7931e709f30e932938218f Xenial (tor_0.2.7.6-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb) 997b717acaf207770

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> much less an untrusted tor package For information, the tor binary inside the snap doesn’t match any official upstream I can find… SHA1 Snap ba16ce2958119a238d7931e709f30e932938218f Xenial (tor_0.2.7.6-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb) 997b717acaf2077708beba39a05adb30c014dfb2 Debian Jessie

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 05:33:43PM +0200, Jan Vidar Krey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016, at 16:43, Aeris wrote: > > > 2) security is better > > > > Sorry to say that, but : no. It’s very weaker than plain old Debian > > package. > > > > This is a matter of perspective on the "security" definition

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> This is a matter of perspective on the "security" definition. Yep of course :P For desktop-purpose, snap can eventually be interresting. You only put yourself at risk. For server-purpose, you also put your users at risk, and in case of Tor, it’s very safer for them to run Tor with at least Op

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016, at 16:43, Aeris wrote: > > 2) security is better > > Sorry to say that, but : no. It’s very weaker than plain old Debian > package. > This is a matter of perspective on the "security" definition. The snaps does run in a separate container group, so it does have some more l

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

> 2) security is better Sorry to say that, but : no. It’s very weaker than plain old Debian package. Currently, your snap embeds : libevent openssl pthreads libasan2 libubsan python 2.7 python-torctl tor-arm tor Any security

[tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

tl;dr: $ sudo apt install snapd; sudo snap install tor-middle-relay Hi. Ubuntu has been working on a new kind of software package* that aims for isolation from the rest of the system, so 1) anyone can create packages for others without review, 2) security is better, and 3) it can be the basis

Re: [tor-relays] new relay - not working right

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15-10-14 10:18 AM, Green Dream wrote: > ClydeBoy is listed three times on Atlas. It appears to be running > from the same server, as the IP/port are the same for all 3 nodes, > however the fingerprint is different for each instance on Atlas: I wa

Re: [tor-relays] new relay - not working right

Pardon the bad copy/paste in the last email. The third listing on Atlas is: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/3FE1025A1E779CAFD21F593AC200C7447703343D ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/ma

Re: [tor-relays] new relay - not working right

ClydeBoy is listed three times on Atlas. It appears to be running from the same server, as the IP/port are the same for all 3 nodes, however the fingerprint is different for each instance on Atlas: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/68F162C50F22205FB3B728ACE67470B17D7430D6 https://atlas.torproj

Re: [tor-relays] new relay - not working right

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15-10-13 01:47 PM, Green Dream wrote: > Hi. Thanks for running a relay. Thank you both for answering me. The relay's nickname is "ClydeBoy" and is listed on blutmagie so I presume is on Atlas & Globe. I have a "normal" flag and "running". The

Re: [tor-relays] new relay - not working right

Hi. Thanks for running a relay. > For several days now its bandwidth, according to ARM, is in the > bits/second and there seems to be some problem reading its own > torrc file. Also, while it had four connections for a while, there are > none now. Regarding the low bandwidth and a low number of

[tor-relays] new relay - not working right

Hi all, I have recently installed a new tor relay (non-exit) in a new vsp. For several days now its bandwidth, according to ARM, is in the bits/second and there seems to be some problem reading its own torrc file. Also, while it had four connections for a while, there are none now. Part of ARM

Re: [tor-relays] New relay not recognised by weathermap

Cool; I've been meaning to see if I could lend a hand with any of the Tor-related codebases, I'll take a look into it and see if I can help out when I get some time. Sharif -- PGP: 6FB7 ED25 BFCF 3E22 72AE 6E8C 47D4 CE7F 6B9F DF57 signature.asc Description: PGP signature __

Re: [tor-relays] New relay not recognised by weathermap

On March 31, 2015 1:12:21 AM Sharif Olorin wrote: Hi, > It can take a while, just try again in the next 24-48 hours. Don't worry > right now. Ah, thanks, good to know. Might it be worth updating the "fingerprint not found" page to say "a few days" rather than "an hour"? The current version se

Re: [tor-relays] New relay not recognised by weathermap

> It can take a while, just try again in the next 24-48 hours. Don't worry > right now. Ah, thanks, good to know. Might it be worth updating the "fingerprint not found" page to say "a few days" rather than "an hour"? The current version seems to imply that it's expected to be working inside that

[tor-relays] New relay not recognised gy weathermap

Sharuf, I completely forgot to welcome you and thank you for running a relay ! So, welcome and i hope you stay for quite a while :-) -- Sincerely yours / Sincères salutations / M.f.G. Sebastian Urbach - Religion is fundamentally opposed to everything I h

Re: [tor-relays] New relay not recognised by weathermap

On March 31, 2015 12:41:42 AM Sharif Olorin wrote: Hi Sharif, Hi all, I configured a new relay[0] yesterday, and recently tried to sign up for the Weathermap[1], wherein I get a "could not locate a Tor node with that fingerprint" error message. The node's definitely been up for more than an h

[tor-relays] New relay not recognised by weathermap

Hi all, I configured a new relay[0] yesterday, and recently tried to sign up for the Weathermap[1], wherein I get a "could not locate a Tor node with that fingerprint" error message. The node's definitely been up for more than an hour, and Atlas can see it[2]. Is this expected behaviour, or might

Re: [tor-relays] New relay operator. Basic security practices?

This email ( link to the blog post ) was powted a while ago on the Full Disclosure mailing list. Some of the advice only applies to Desktop computers, but I find it's still a very good read in the general case. -- Justicerage ???- Original Message - From: "Joshua Rogers" To: f

Re: [tor-relays] New relay operator. Basic security practices?

I wrote this recently: https://gist.github.com/plsql/49e642d5bce835df2946 Thanks so much for considering security! It's a very important and often neglected aspect of Tor relay operation. Let me know what you think of the document. Libertas I just started to look at it, but it seem

Re: [tor-relays] New relay operator. Basic security practices?

You may wish to revise your guide to better SSH. https://stribika.github.io/2015/01/04/secure-secure-shell.html Particularly, running it through a Tor HS. Other ideal reading is the BetterCrypto guide: https://bettercrypto.org/static/applied-crypto-hardening.pdf Cheers On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at

Re: [tor-relays] New relay operator. Basic security practices?

On 03/04/2015 02:05 PM, relay_a...@openmailbox.org wrote: > Hello all. I'm running a new relay, relayacab, at apexy in DE on a > minimal Debian 7 OS. Is there a best practices guide for basic security > setup? This is my first time operating a remote machine, running a > relay, and having any pu

[tor-relays] New relay operator. Basic security practices?

Hello all. I'm running a new relay, relayacab, at apexy in DE on a minimal Debian 7 OS. Is there a best practices guide for basic security setup? This is my first time operating a remote machine, running a relay, and having any public service to harden. So I'd really like to take this opportuni

[tor-relays] new relay - large variation in consensus weight

Hello all, I am running a middle relay on a digital ocean [1] for roughly about a month now. While the process has been fairly straight forward, in the last few days I have noticed a large variation in the relays consensus weight. Right now it is close 1000 a few days before it was 300. Is this

Re: [tor-relays] new relay acting strange

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 05:24:13AM +0100, Athena Lester wrote: > Hello, > This is the first tor relay I have set up, it has been running for going on 4 > days. I was waiting for the 3 day lag period I have read about but still no > activity, besides the 30 MBs or so per day. It is running on my v

Re: [tor-relays] new relay acting strange

Hi. Are you sure that the Tor process is still running and the ORport is still reachable? It seems like there were two Tor processes running on the same VPS with different fingerprints but on the same port (which is not possible. You can run two processes on the same IP address, but you have to as

[tor-relays] new relay acting strange

Hello, This is the first tor relay I have set up, it has been running for going on 4 days. I was waiting for the 3 day lag period I have read about but still no activity, besides the 30 MBs or so per day. It is running on my vps located in the Netherlands. The thing that is strange is when I sea