On 13 Apr 2014, at 19:45, Scott Bennett wrote:
> Mateusz B?aszczyk wrote:
>
>>
>> I am wondering that another effect of the heartbleed was increased TLS
>> overhead, that I saw many times also before April-7.
>> Unfortunately I do not store more than 7 files worth of logs:
>>
>> Apr 1 02:50
Mateusz B?aszczyk wrote:
>
> I am wondering that another effect of the heartbleed was increased TLS
> overhead, that I saw many times also before April-7.
> Unfortunately I do not store more than 7 files worth of logs:
>
> Apr 1 02:50:23 localhost Tor[394]: TLS write overhead: 7%
> Apr 1 08:51
I am wondering that another effect of the heartbleed was increased TLS
overhead, that I saw many times also before April-7.
Unfortunately I do not store more than 7 files worth of logs:
Apr 1 02:50:23 localhost Tor[394]: TLS write overhead: 7%
Apr 1 08:51:35 localhost Tor[394]: TLS write overh
On Apr 12, 2014, at 12:34 , Scott Bennett wrote:
> [...] the sporadic, sudden mobbing of relays by tens to
> hundreds of times as many incoming connections as those relays
> normally get, often for up to several hours at a time. Systems
> whose CPUs are not powerful enough to keep up with the he
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 08:45:23PM +, Delton Barnes wrote:
> > "Two sources familiar with matter" could merely be two computer security
> > experts who have an unsubstantiated opinion that the NSA was exploiting
> > this beforehand. We have no idea how credible thes
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 08:45:23PM +, Delton Barnes wrote:
> "Two sources familiar with matter" could merely be two computer security
> experts who have an unsubstantiated opinion that the NSA was exploiting
> this beforehand. We have no idea how credible these sources are.
I agree.
I'm assu
Delton Barnes:
> That said, if you carefully parse the statement from DNI, it seems to me
> to imply they were aware of the Heartbleed vulnerability in 2014. Why
> would they say "before 2014" instead of "before its disclosure Monday"
> or something? They may have known about it weeks or months i
Jesse Victors:
> "The U.S. National Security Agency knew for at least two years about a
> flaw in the way that many websites send sensitive information, now
> dubbed the Heartbleed bug, and regularly used it to gather critical
> intelligence, two people familiar with the matter said. The NSA said i
sswords... let's hope
>that attention I have for avoiding bad habbits on my personnal computer
>are enough - for me and for others Tor relays Operators !
>
>
>Best regards
>Julien ROBIN
>
>
>
>
>- Mail original -
>De: "Jesse Victors"
>À:
Paris S wrote:
> Interesting.
> Could this be a part of what the leaked documents were referring to as
> "groundbreaking capabilities" a few months back?
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/06/us/nsa-foils-much-internet-encryption.html?pagewanted=4&_r=1&hp
> https://www.eff.org/document/2013-09-05
have for avoiding bad habbits on my personnal computer are enough -
for me and for others Tor relays Operators !
Best regards
Julien ROBIN
- Mail original -
De: "Jesse Victors"
À: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Envoyé: Samedi 12 Avril 2014 02:32:07
Objet: [tor-relays] N
Interesting.
Could this be a part of what the leaked documents were referring to as
"groundbreaking capabilities" a few months back?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/06/us/nsa-foils-much-internet-encryption.html?pagewanted=4&_r=1&hp
https://www.eff.org/document/2013-09-05-guard-bullrun
On Sat, Ap
This is an excellent email.
--
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 5:32 PM PDT Jesse Victors wrote:
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA512
>
>
>Saw this article:
>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-04-11/nsa-said-to-have-used-heartbleed-bug-exposing-consumers.html
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Saw this article:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-04-11/nsa-said-to-have-used-heartbleed-bug-exposing-consumers.html
"The U.S. National Security Agency knew for at least two years about a
flaw in the way that many websites send sensitive inform
14 matches
Mail list logo
