> Thomas White:
> Have there been any updated ETAs concerning the development/support
> of multi-core for the core tor workloads? If not, is there anything
> in particular that I could do to speed the process up? Scaling the
> capabilities of the Tor process would be a huge relief and help for
> m
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 20:31:56 +0500
> From: Roman Mamedov
>
> On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:13:13 -0400
> 12xBTM <12x...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Improving multi-core support can allow users to saturate high bandwidth
>> connections with cheaper processors, less setup, and just more efficient
>> depl
On Tue, 02 Jun 2015 11:13:13 -0400
12xBTM <12x...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Improving multi-core support can allow users to saturate high bandwidth
> connections with cheaper processors, less setup, and just more efficient
> deployment of high-capacity nodes in general. Improving multi-core
> support
Improving multi-core support can allow users to saturate high bandwidth
connections with cheaper processors, less setup, and just more efficient
deployment of high-capacity nodes in general. Improving multi-core
support should be a major priority.
-12xBTM
On 1.6.15 9:11, Tor-Admin wrote:
---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I have to agree with that, multicore support is really important and
should be on the top of the priority list.
Thomas White:
> Have there been any updated ETAs concerning the development/support
> of multi-core for the core tor workloads? If not, i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Have there been any updated ETAs concerning the development/support of
multi-core for the core tor workloads? If not, is there anything in
particular that I could do to speed the process up? Scaling the
capabilities of the Tor process would be a huge r
