2015 11:05:49 +
>>
>>
>>> Message: 3
>>> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:36:59 +0100
>>> From: Network Operations Center
>>> To: tor-relays at lists.torproject.org
>>> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Help - My relay consensus has been stripped
>&g
, Issue 15
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:05:49 +
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 11:36:59 +0100
From: Network Operations Center
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Help - My relay consensus has been stripped
backto 20
Message-ID
n 2015 11:36:59 +0100
> From: Network Operations Center
> To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Help - My relay consensus has been stripped
> backto 20
> Message-ID: <84a966b4ad0f4d6a230d7b51f1d6b...@schokomil.ch>
> Content-Type: text/plain
From: Sebastian Urbach
To:
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Help - My relay consensus has been stripped
back to 20
Message-ID:
<14aad6973e8.27ae.e04ee758f2dadc1889b5b423dda55...@urbach.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
On January 3, 2015 2:03
On January 4, 2015 11:14:17 PM bigbud...@safe-mail.net wrote:
Hi,
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 02:30:55 +0100
> From: Sebastian Urbach
> To:
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Help - My relay consensus has been stripped
> backto 20
> Message-ID:
> <14aad6973e8.27ae.e04ee758f2dadc1889b5b42
[tor-relays] Help - My relay consensus has been stripped
back to 20
Message-ID:
<14aad6973e8.27ae.e04ee758f2dadc1889b5b423dda55...@urbach.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
On January 3, 2015 2:03:33 AM bigbud...@safe-mail.net wrote:
Hi
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 02:30:55 +0100
> From: Sebastian Urbach
> To:
> Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Help - My relay consensus has been stripped
> backto 20
> Message-ID:
> <14aad6973e8.27ae.e04ee758f2dadc1889b5b423dda55...@urbach.o
On January 3, 2015 2:03:33 AM bigbud...@safe-mail.net wrote:
Hi,
Thanks Sebastian, That explains the loss of guard status back in August at
least. I totally missed that announcement.
Back to the main issue, it does look like one or two others at least are
having this problem. Is it simply as
Thanks Sebastian, That explains the loss of guard status back in August at
least. I totally missed that announcement.
Back to the main issue, it does look like one or two others at least are having
this problem. Is it simply as a result of being in a Lizard-blacklisted
netblock? Bigbud is in 8
Hi,
Found the snippet with the changes for the guards:
Tor Weekly News, 30th of July 2014
Once directory authorities have upgraded, they will “assign the Guard flag
to the fastest 25% of the network”. Some experiments showed that “for the
current network, this results in about 1100 guards, do
On January 3, 2015 12:29:48 AM bigbud...@safe-mail.net wrote:
Hi,
On a related note the relay lost guard status too a few months ago and I
couldn't see why that would be.
The criterias for the guards changed a few months ago but i can't find the
text right now. You can see a nose dive regard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This was reported yesterday 01.01.2015 in IRC too, for this relay:
3D7E274A87D9A89AF064C13D1EE4CA1F184F2600
The same it was pushing good amounts of traffic and the consensus
weight dropped to 20 with no modifications made to the Tor config file
or an
On the 29th December one of our relays, bigbud
(6911888F83565892FE23F1B03EB501D80E1E8780) which had a consensus of 630+ and
had been running for nearly 18 months (100 days uptime running 2.5.8) suddenly
started receiving much less traffic.
I have seen a gradual reduction in traffic over the co
13 matches
Mail list logo
