Indeed I did extrapolate linearly - thank you for your high quality
answers, not everyone has the time to read every line of the Tor code
base and it's documentation.
You are being very helpful and I'm glad I can finally leave this issue
behind while having learned some new stuff.
Stay awesome!
Never mind - looks like I got my guard flag back now, yay!
Thanks so much for the help everyone.
William
2020-08-06 0:45 GMT, William Kane :
> 2145977 of 2190729 are 97.96%.. if it's really changing that slowly,
> it's gonna take at least another 32 days, seeing that it took 8 days
> to go from
Hi William,
you failed to take into account the algorithm that weighs more frequent
downtime more than less recent downtime. You seem to have just
extrapolated linearly.
Cheers
Sebastian
> On 8. Aug 2020, at 20:27, William Kane wrote:
>
> Never mind - looks like I got my guard flag back now, y
2145977 of 2190729 are 97.96%.. if it's really changing that slowly,
it's gonna take at least another 32 days, seeing that it took 8 days
to go from 97.95% to 97.96%..
..thats slow.
Also, thanks for the correct site, I randomly searched
"consensus-health" and just used the first site.. dumb mista
Strange, it's still missing the Guard flag after 8 days of consecutive
uptime - maybe I'm just being impatient?
Weirdly enough, the relay is also missing on
https://utternoncesense.com/consensus-health.html.
Every other relay that I look up can be found on there.
Given that my relay's WOF was 97
> On 5. Aug 2020, at 17:25, William Kane wrote:
>
> Strange, it's still missing the Guard flag after 8 days of consecutive
> uptime - maybe I'm just being impatient?
>
> Weirdly enough, the relay is also missing on
> https://utternoncesense.com/consensus-health.html.
>
> Every other relay tha
On 31.07.2020 14:41, William Kane wrote:
That was very informative and educational compared to the other
replies.
+1
On 29.07.2020 05:21, ECAN - Matt Westfall wrote:
Yeah you wouldn't want to instantly throw a relay the Guard flag back
after any kind of down time, because the whole point of a
Thank you!
That was very informative and educational compared to the other replies.
Best Regards,
William Kane
2020-07-29 3:18 GMT, Sebastian Hahn :
> Hi William,
>
>> On 29. Jul 2020, at 00:45, Matt Traudt wrote:
>>
>> The Guard flag conditions are
>> https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/
an Hahn"
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Sent: 7/28/2020 11:18:14 PM
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Guard flag got removed after only 48 hours of
downtime.
Hi William,
On 29. Jul 2020, at 00:45, Matt Traudt wrote:
The Guard flag conditions are
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tr
Hi William,
> On 29. Jul 2020, at 00:45, Matt Traudt wrote:
>
> The Guard flag conditions are
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2640
>
> Given you're Fast and Stable, and have a good advertised bandwidth and
> weight, then I suspect you simply no longer have a Weigh
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Please discard the previous (empty) email, it was an error on my end.
Today, I noticed that my guard flag has been taken away:
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/47E1157F7DA6DF80EC00D745D73ACD7B0A380BCF
Does this have to do with the recent two, major downtime's of the relay?
While I
The Guard flag conditions are
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2640
Given you're Fast and Stable, and have a good advertised bandwidth and
weight, then I suspect you simply no longer have a Weighted Fractional
Uptime that is at least the median for "familiar" relays.
T
13 matches
Mail list logo
