On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Kali Tor wrote:
> So, no way to offer DS while setting AccountingMax?
Correct.
At least in the scenario in this thread, not advertising the dirport
is a good choice by Tor, since it saves all your bandwidth for 'real'
Tor traffic.
The key thing to realiz
So, no way to offer DS while setting AccountingMax?
-kali-
> On Thursday, June 26, 2014 10:02 PM, Kali Tor wrote:
> >
>
>> I had
>> not read anything about this either, until I tried to enable
>> it
>> and got this in my log:
>
>> 10:15:43 [NOTICE] Not
>> advertising DirPort (Reason:
> I had
> not read anything about this either, until I tried to enable
> it
> and got this in my log:
> 10:15:43 [NOTICE] Not
> advertising DirPort (Reason: AccountingMax enabled)
Exactly what I experienced at my side and hence my assumption that enabling
AccountingMax disables DirPort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/26/2014 7:46 PM, Kali Tor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is my understanding correct that if I set AccountingMax, the relay
> will never be used as a DR?
>
> It kind of feels odd because in my situation I can donate 500GB
> (and maybe even more) but I do wan
On 06/26/2014 01:13 PM, s7r wrote:
> On 6/26/2014 7:46 PM, Kali Tor wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> Is my understanding correct that if I set AccountingMax, the relay
>> will never be used as a DR?
>
>> It kind of feels odd because in my situation I can donate 500GB
>> (and maybe even more) but I do want to
Hi,
Is my understanding correct that if I set AccountingMax, the relay will never
be used as a DR?
It kind of feels odd because in my situation I can donate 500GB (and maybe
even more) but I do want to keep a max limit and at the same time let the relay
be a DR as well. Any way to achieve thi
