For the last 3 days its been 50 cents, whereas usually vps are $20 per
month at least. I am wondering whats the minimal amount of traffic a bridge
should push to be useful? I am thinking of limiting the tor bridge traffic
per month. Thanks.
--Keifer
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 2:12 PM Matt Traudt wro
On 4/26/21 1:40 PM, Keifer Bly wrote:
> So for a little bit over a week now, I have been running a bridge on
> Google Cloud and it has charged less then $5. So, while too expensive
> for running relays, it seems to be an ok service for running bridges on.
Is $0.085/GB (egress) accurate[0]? Mean
yeah hosting in Germany is much better. With the new laws in place the BND is
happy to deliver all Tor traffic from Frankfurt to the NSA.
> On 29. Apr 2021, at 16:25, li...@for-privacy.net wrote:
>
> I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks a US cloud is the worst case for a
> Tor relay. Most li
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks a US cloud is the worst case for a
Tor relay. Most likely daily VM snapshots directly to NSA. ;-)
¹William mentioned the interesting WEDOS DC1 data center to him beforehand.
²There are only 8 relays so far.
¹https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-rela
if you want to run a bridge, Ionos is your new best friend, shitty VPS für 1
Euro a month. It is shit but runs a bridge perfectly.
> On 26. Apr 2021, at 19:40, Keifer Bly wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> So for a little bit over a week now, I have been running a bridge on Google
> Cloud and it has cha
Hi List, So for a little bit over a week now, I have been running a bridge on Google Cloud and it has charged less then $5. So, while too expensive for running relays, it seems to be an ok service for running bridges on. I think we need as much diversity as possible so having nodes running on as m
