> On 9 Jun 2017, at 16:05, Scott Bennett wrote:
>
>> My relays have multiple IP addresses on a single WAN interface. They all use
>> OutboundBindAddress to separate OR and Dir traffic from outbound traffic. And
>> they make up about 1% of Tor guard/middle bandwidth.
>
> So, although the tra
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:05:43AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> > > I think you will find this is not an uncommon configuration among
> > > high-bandwidth relays.
> >
> > I will check further into the procedure for which Roger posted a URL
> > to see whether it wi
On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 01:05:43AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> > I think you will find this is not an uncommon configuration among
> > high-bandwidth relays.
>
> I will check further into the procedure for which Roger posted a URL
> to see whether it will indeed give me a list of such addre
teor wrote:
>
> > On 9 Jun 2017, at 08:30, Scott Bennett wrote:
> >
> > Roman Mamedov wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:43:00 -0500
> >> Scott Bennett wrote:
> >>
> >>> As noted more than once previously, the pf rules *pass* all traffic
> >>> from relay addresses *first*, so that t
> On 9 Jun 2017, at 08:30, Scott Bennett wrote:
>
> Roman Mamedov wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:43:00 -0500
>> Scott Bennett wrote:
>>
>>> As noted more than once previously, the pf rules *pass* all traffic
>>> from relay addresses *first*, so that traffic has already gone on to tor
Roman Mamedov wrote:
Hi Roman!
> On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:43:00 -0500
> Scott Bennett wrote:
>
> > As noted more than once previously, the pf rules *pass* all traffic
> > from relay addresses *first*, so that traffic has already gone on to tor
> > before the block list is applied.
>
> There a
tor wrote:
> > I tried disabling pf and restarting tor. To my surprise, the authorities
> > connected to my relay successfully and distributed its information in
> > subsequent consensuses!
>
> Haha. This is the least surprising thing I've read all week.
Then either you weren't paying atten
> I tried disabling pf and restarting tor. To my surprise, the authorities
> connected to my relay successfully and distributed its information in
> subsequent consensuses!
Haha. This is the least surprising thing I've read all week.___
tor-relays mailin
On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 09:43:00 -0500
Scott Bennett wrote:
> As noted more than once previously, the pf rules *pass* all traffic
> from relay addresses *first*, so that traffic has already gone on to tor
> before the block list is applied.
There are most likely some relays which use a differen
teor wrote:
>
> > On 8 Jun 2017, at 18:44, Scott Bennett wrote:
> >
> > Roger Dingledine wrote:
> >
> > Or at least partially solved, at any rate. The problem is solved,
> > but the mystery remains.
> >
> >> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 07:14:06PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> >>> Which
> On 8 Jun 2017, at 18:44, Scott Bennett wrote:
>
> Roger Dingledine wrote:
>
> Or at least partially solved, at any rate. The problem is solved,
> but the mystery remains.
>
>> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 07:14:06PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
>>> Which versions are the Running votes co
Roger Dingledine wrote:
Or at least partially solved, at any rate. The problem is solved,
but the mystery remains.
> On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 07:14:06PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> > Which versions are the Running votes coming from versus the
> > non-Running?
>
> You can see the vot
12 matches
Mail list logo
