Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Nick Mathewson:
> > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Jacob Appelbaum
> > wrote:
> >> Nick Mathewson:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Jacob Appelbaum
> >>> wrote:
> >> Oh, I don't mean to imply not to file bugs but rather, if we have a
> >> guard that fails cir
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:24:36 -0400 Nick Mathewson
wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> It is nice to see you posting again, I had wondered where you had gone.
>>
>> Scott Bennett:
>>> I know this really belongs on tor-talk, but I haven't bee
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:12:36 -0400 Nick Mathewson
wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Steve Snyder wrote:
>> On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:12pm, "Jacob Appelbaum"
>> said:
>> [snip]
>>> It seems that there are two issues - one is that a guard is failing to
>>> build circuits, the o
Hi Jacob et al.,
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:12:06 + Jacob Appelbaum
wrote:
>It is nice to see you posting again, I had wondered where you had gone.
I've been here all along, but didn't have anything to say until this
matter came up.
>
>Scott Bennett:
>> I know this really belongs o
Nick Mathewson:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> Nick Mathewson:
>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Jacob Appelbaum
>>> wrote:
Hi Scott,
It is nice to see you posting again, I had wondered where you had gone.
Scott Bennett:
> I know
Nick Mathewson:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> It is nice to see you posting again, I had wondered where you had gone.
>>
>> Scott Bennett:
>>> I know this really belongs on tor-talk, but I haven't been subscribed
>>> to it for a long time now. S
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Nick Mathewson:
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>>> Hi Scott,
>>>
>>> It is nice to see you posting again, I had wondered where you had gone.
>>>
>>> Scott Bennett:
I know this really belongs on tor-tal
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> It is nice to see you posting again, I had wondered where you had gone.
>
> Scott Bennett:
>> I know this really belongs on tor-talk, but I haven't been subscribed
>> to it for a long time now. Sorry if posting this here
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Steve Snyder wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:12pm, "Jacob Appelbaum"
> said:
> [snip]
>> It seems that there are two issues - one is that a guard is failing to
>> build circuits, the other is that you can't seem to exclude them. I have
>> to admit, I'm
On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:12pm, "Jacob Appelbaum"
said:
[snip]
> It seems that there are two issues - one is that a guard is failing to
> build circuits, the other is that you can't seem to exclude them. I have
> to admit, I'm more interested in the former... Is there a pattern to the
> fa
Hi Scott,
It is nice to see you posting again, I had wondered where you had gone.
Scott Bennett:
> I know this really belongs on tor-talk, but I haven't been subscribed
> to it for a long time now. Sorry if posting this here bothers anyone.
Seems like a fine place to discuss relay problem
I know this really belongs on tor-talk, but I haven't been subscribed
to it for a long time now. Sorry if posting this here bothers anyone.
Back in early July, I upgraded from 0.2.3.13-alpha to 0.2.3.18-rc.
I immediately ran into problems with a python script that honors the
http_proxy e
12 matches
Mail list logo
