> On 17 Oct 2018, at 02:38, Toralf Förster wrote:
>
>> On 10/15/18 11:49 PM, teor wrote:
>> The post contains conflicting advice.
>
> Said that, is the following a good choice for a bridge? :
>
> # torrc
>
> RunAsDaemon 1
>
> SocksPort 0
> ControlPort 9051
> ORPort auto
> BridgeRelay 1
> Exi
On 10/15/18 11:49 PM, teor wrote:
> The post contains conflicting advice.
Said that, is the following a good choice for a bridge? :
# torrc
RunAsDaemon 1
SocksPort 0
ControlPort 9051
ORPort auto
BridgeRelay 1
Exitpolicy reject *:*
ServerTransportPlugin obfs4 exec /usr/bin/obfs4proxy
--
To
> On 16 Oct 2018, at 03:58, Toralf Förster wrote:
>
> I do wonder if the advice [1] is ok or wrong.
>
> [1] https://tor.stackexchange.com/questions/6370/how-to-run-an-obfs4-bridge
The post contains conflicting advice.
> But diversity of obfs4 ports is actually really important, so I'd argue
I do wonder if the advice [1] is ok or wrong.
[1] https://tor.stackexchange.com/questions/6370/how-to-run-an-obfs4-bridge
--
Toralf
PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lis
