Hi Toralf and Gus,
Thanks for your replies!
On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 4:11 PM, Toralf Förster
wrote:
On 10/26/20 5:32 PM, entensai...@use.startmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm not sure this is the right list to ask, but is it useful to run
snowflake proxies?
I'd say yes.
FWIW I
Hi everybody,
I'm not sure this is the right list to ask, but is it useful to run
snowflake
proxies? I only recently realized they can be run by ordinary people.
On the new website I don't see how you would find that out, there
doesn't
seem to be any link pointing to them.
Metrics only shows
Dear Torix,
On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 at 12:10 AM, to...@protonmail.com wrote:
Dear list,
I get this on just one of my relays -
"Our IP Address has changed from xxx toxxx; rebuilding descriptor
(source: METHOD=GETHOSTNAME HOSTNAME=xxx).
Aug 11 00:33:54.000 [notice] Your IP address seems
Hi Keifer,
On Monday, July 20, 2020 at 7:45 AM, Keifer Bly
wrote:
Hi all,
So my middel guard relay at
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/79E3B585803DE805CCBC00C1EF36B1E74372861D
As well as my bridge at
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/EF36AE38C162E96E06
Hi list,
First of all, why is email verification not used as an additional
method for making family settings?
(Additional meaning that operators could choose to either verify their
mail address or write all their
relays fingerprints in the config.)
Wouldn't it be more convenient to verify the
Hi,
On Sunday, July 5, 2020 at 8:45 PM, Imre Jonk wrote:
Hi nusenu,
On Sun, 2020-07-05 at 18:35 +0200, nusenu wrote:
[...]
b) require a verified physical address for large operators (>=0.5%
exit or guard probability)
(manual verification, low number of operators).
It is not required
Hi people,
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 at 7:38 AM, petra...@protonmail.ch wrote:
Hello all,
my relay is set up to support 42 Mbps, however does not get any real
traffic routed through it (605EE4375EE4C38215C8949F5808863749FD4F4A).
I checked anything I could think of but everything looks fine
Hi friend,
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 at 7:38 AM, petra...@protonmail.ch wrote:
Hello all,
my relay is set up to support 42 Mbps, however does not get any real
traffic routed through it (605EE4375EE4C38215C8949F5808863749FD4F4A).
I checked anything I could think of but everything looks fine
Hi,
On Friday, May 8, 2020 at 7:39 PM, Anonforpeace
wrote:
I have the port forwarded. I've also noticed that the advertised
bandwidth is only 248 KiB/s on the metrics page. This is a first and
I'm not sure how to raise the bandwidth. Could this be what's causing
it to stay offline??
No. Th
Hi,
On Thursday, March 5, 2020 at 8:24 PM, Imre Jonk
wrote:
Hi Eddie,
On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 12:34 -0800, Eddie wrote:
Does BandwidthRate apply to bridges. I can (hopefully) guess that
RelayBandwidth doesn't.
Does the AccountingMax apply.
I am almost certain that all three options apply
On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 7:29 PM, Mario Costa
wrote:
Il giorno 21 nov 2019, alle ore 15:49, Matt Traudt
ha scritto:
Thanks for running a bridge.
Check Tor's logs to make sure it is actually running and doesn't
report
issues. Search its hashed fingerprint on
https://metric
Hi!
Most online surveys ask the participants to confirm that their replies
can be used after the last question of the survey. I would recommend
you to do that, too.
Sometimes people give random answers because they are curious about the
survey's questions. ;-)
Dear Tor relay operators,
We
Hi Keifer!
On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 8:23 AM, Keifer Bly
wrote:
Hi, based on the heartbeat log, about 2 clients seem to use the
bridge every six hours. The log says.
"In the last 6 hours I have seen 2 unique clients. Tor's uptime is 12
hours, with 0 circuits open."
How are you
Hi Keifer,
Hello List, my bridge relay at
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/148BD64BED9F2C27637D986DE032ECF14E5B9E9A
Is reporting the relay speed is between 50 kb/s and 60 kb/s, when the
speed of the internet connection it is running off of is actually
much faster than this, gen
Hi Kenneth,
find the answers here:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2018-July/015748.html
It would be great to add that to the guide at
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/PluggableTransports/obfs4proxy
^^.
Hello,
I'm in the process of setting up a couple of
HI,
I have a VPS server with fast internet connection.
I would like to configure tor bridge on that machine.
VPS server has configured some services already. If tor bridge
service
will run on that machine (IP), will it generate any impact for IP
reputation ? I mean blacklisting.
Greetings
Today I actually tried to connect to it and it is possible to
connect to the
bridge using the ORport.
But when I tried to start tor browser with this setting to use
obfs4:
obfs4 12.345.67.89: (only with the right numbers)
it got stuck at "establishing an encrypted network connection
Dear friends,
I am uncuccessfully running a bridge that uses obfs4 as pluggable
transport. (At least it should.)
Today I actually tried to connect to it and it is possible to connect
to the bridge using the ORport.
But when I tried to start tor browser with this setting to use obfs4:
obfs4 12
Hi people :)
Recently I wanted to setup a relay and realized that I dont have an
IPv4 address.
(and that's not gonna change for the next two years.)
So do you know if it is going to be possible to run an IPv6-only relay
soon?
Are there projects I could support already without having an IPv4
a
Am Montag, 12. Februar 2018 um 12:33 schrieb nusenu
:
If you block the ORPort, won't the reachability check fail?
Fine question. At least this has been the case in the past, though I
know there was discussion and maybe development to overcome this
weakness. But even if it's not possible ye
20 matches
Mail list logo