It's working much better now. Things started improving just a few hours
after I posted my previous message, around last Friday afternoon PDT.
The web page and email channels started giving out vanilla bridges again
(usually 2), and I consistently got 2 obfs4 bridges via Moat and the web
page. I
Hi, Phillip. Thanks for the response, and for taking on these issues. I
also sent a more detailed direct report to frontd...@torproject.org. It
apparently crossed with your reply to this thread in the mail, I wasn't
intending to nag. I assume that'll end up forwarded to you as well,
hopefully t
Hi, all. While skimming /r/tor on Reddit I saw a couple of posts saying
they hadn't been able to get any usable bridges for several days, and
thought I'd check into it. I downloaded & installed a fresh copy of the
Windows TBB 8.5.1 and had it ask for bridges via Moat, and received 2
(not 3?) ob
nings
and the relay is stable.
Is this reason for concern?
Rick
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
bian 8 Stable in a AS provided VM with 1GB of RAM. Typical
CPU load is ~40%, and typical RAM use is ~50%.
Rick
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
So far, the GFW blocks the bridges it discovers by IP:port. Therefore,
you can run two bridges on your machine and if one gets discovered, the
other one should still be reachable. Of course, that could change any
moment.
Wow, that's a pretty huge and inexplicable oversight on their part. Hard
I've read that obfs4 and scramblesuit are very resistant ("immune" is so
optimistic) to such things as active probes performed by the Great
Firewall, which can quickly probe and detect older transports (and of
course vanilla ORports), plus the older transports and ORports are
subject to relativ
Hi all,
I'm brand new to this, so I'll apologize in advance if this is a
silly question.
I've just recently set up a Tor box on Debian, all looks well, logs
show it's happy. I've got it setup for 100 Meg bandwidth, 200M burst.
My confusion is because when I look it up on Globe or Atlas, it
ry trusting these days of
manufacturers' binary blob firmware.
Good luck,
Rick
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
#x27;t care less about my LAN. :-\
Thanks
Rick
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
It may be partially related, in that I've seen it take weeks to
gradually gain a new set of clients after an IP change, which is why I
think it's so important to not be abandoning all your clients each time
but instead let them update their bridge entries to your new address. If
you've been up
I run a bridge from a "semi-static" home internet account, where the
address is dynamically assigned but only changes when either the ISP or
my hardware router goes down and forces a reconnect, which only happens
maybe once every several months. I've read in a few places that Tor
bridges with d
Hi. I removed the recently-deprecated obfs2 transport from my (0.2.4.22)
bridge's torrc, but after restarting, it seems to still be advertising
support for it.
It correctly doesn't appear as a "Registered server transport obfs2"
line in the tor log file, and it's not listed in the
TOR_PT_SERV
Question how long you'll stay in the Top 50. Maybe you are lucky but
probably the ISP will end your contract for "abusing" fair use
policies/TOS. Best case they'll throttle you down. Let us know in 30 days :)
Am 22.03.14 21:51, schrieb Trigger Happy:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm running tor-relay (middle) o
On 10/04/2013 04:31 AM, grarpamp wrote:
Anyone also offering up vpngate, i2p, mail mixes, other
p2p/networks, etc to the public on their relay platform?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mai
Still, for big guys who do have financial considerations and
are probably better positioned to handle risk this could make sense.
I'm sure Torproject would love to have a few thousand more folks like
me, but that's a marketing issue that probably spins around getting T
OK, never mind, I figured it out. The only points of conflict between
my relay and the TBB are that the control ports and Socks listener ports
for the two Tor instances both default to the same values. So I changed
the ControlPort in Data\Vidalia\vidalia.conf to 9151 and added SocksPort
9150
I run a relay 24/7, but sometimes also want to use Tor myself as a
client. Until now, I've been using the Tor Button in my normal Firefox
browser to switch in and out of Tor mode as needed, but now I see that
going forward, the standalone Tor Browser Bundle is the only recommended
way of using
Is the metrics portal at https://metrics.torproject.org/ partly down, or
undergoing maintenance or something? I see that some of the stats don't
seem to have been updated in the last week or so. Many of the graphs
are truncated, e.g.
https://metrics.torproject.org/users.html?graph=direct-user
On 9/27/2011 1:37 PM, "Steve Snyder" wrote:
Either there is simply not enough traffic to saturate all available middle
nodes or Tor's node selection algorithm is, um, sub-optimal.
I just started my relay a month ago, so I've done some research, and it
seems to be pretty complicated. Please
On 9/27/2011 1:37 PM, "Steve Snyder" wrote:
Also, I have come to distrust TorStatus. Why? Because difference sites will
have different numbers while supposedly monitoring the same network. One of my
nodes is currently showing an Observed bandwidth of 10KB (yes, ten) at
torstatus.blutmagie
On 9/27/2011 1:37 PM, tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
No idea what shaping algorithm Tor uses, nor any clue on recommended
burst ratios under said algorithm. Anyone???.
I believe Tor uses a token bucket algorithm
(https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Token_bucket) for
t
22 matches
Mail list logo
