Some time ago I started publishing the regexes I run on my mailserver to drop spam like this. The
criteria for showing up is that you have to repeatedly send garbage and not bother responding (or
respond with disdain) to followups. Happy to accept patches to grow the list!
https://git.bitcoin.n
A few replies inline, but, in general, I only run two small exits, so the level of effort and amount of spam I get is
very low (my blocklist currently only has three entries :) ). If any other exit operators have a similar "I try to help
educate you, if you don't bother responding I'll start drop
Tor exit node operators with similar policies and
collaborating on such blocklists would save all of us with similar policies time.
Matt
On 9/28/20 2:18 PM, Tortilla wrote:
On Mon, September 28, 2020 5:04 pm, Matt Corallo wrote:
Hi all,
I run a few relatively-small exit nodes, and still get a decent
Hi all,
I run a few relatively-small exit nodes, and still get a decent flow of the usual Fail2Ban, blocklist.de, and such
garbage to abuse PoCs. I tend to proactively find appropriate abuse/noc contacts to provide a response informing them of
how they can appropriately block all Tor exits from
This may be true, but I think you underestimate how few sites are on the HSTS preload list or are enforced by SSL
Everywhere.
Ultimately, unless the first site you load in a browsing session is HTTPS or unless you end up at an HSTS
preload-enforced site, sslstrip can just keep taking the "s" pa
While I fully support the direction here I do wonder if there’s not also other
information that could be used. Eg in bitcoin-land we have persistent issues
with anti-privacy services operating large numbers of relays all one three
ASNs. In the future, we’ll likely be shipping a compressed netbl
s, but it sounds
like there’s no good existing work in this domain?
Matt
> On Jan 10, 2020, at 17:36, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 16:24:56 +
> Matt Corallo wrote:
>
>> Cool! What did your testing rig look like?
>
> A few years ago I've go
Cool! What did your testing rig look like?
I suppose the real question is what does the latency/loss profile of the
average Tor (bridge) user look like?
On 1/10/20 8:18 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 00:58:36 -0500
> Matt Corallo wrote:
>
>> BBA should handle ran
I’m sure this exists somewhere so this is more of a request-for-links, but
what’s the current thinking on TCP CCA selection for Tor relays? While it has
fairness issues (and reported long-tail issues for higher-latency links, though
I can’t find good in-practice analysis of this), BBA should han
I've taken to contacting the sender of the automated abuse reports and
noting that sending such emails may actually not be legal (at least in
the US) under CAN-SPAM. In some cases I've seen positive response as
people aren't even aware their random server with fail2ban is sending
these things.
Mat
10 matches
Mail list logo
