Re: [tor-relays] Linode, DigitalOcean

easily get 120MBps out of them. -- Kura t: @kuramanga [https://twitter.com/kuramanga] w: https://kura.io/ [https://kura.io/] g: @kura [http://git.io/kura] On 16/01/2015 21:25:43, Dave Warren wrote: I've got a number of servers on Linode and DigitalOcean that could potentially be candidate

Re: [tor-relays] Fwd: [tor-talk] please advise on renting a gigabit capable dedicated server

er-in-moldova.html Good provider, unmetered traffic. Only 100Mbps though. http://www.online.net/en/dedicated-server/dedibox-xc I have a couple of those. 1Gbps link with guaranteed 150Mbps and unmetered for  €15.99 / month. -- Kura t: @kuramanga [https://twitter.com/kuramanga] w: https://kura.io/ [

Re: [tor-relays] IP addresses as false positives?

On 05/01/2015 08:59:41, grarpamp wrote: On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Kura wrote: > I would say that maybe it's a possibility that traffic gets > flagged as such too? > ... > antivirus [...] one that does > traffic inspection Oh, well that could be too. Tor traffic is cr

Re: [tor-relays] IP addresses as false positives?

also very recent, within the last week. -- Kura t: @kuramanga [https://twitter.com/kuramanga] w: https://kura.io/ [https://kura.io/] g: @kura [http://git.io/kura] On 05/01/2015 08:25:11, grarpamp wrote: On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:30 AM, eliaz wrote: > The antivirus program on a machine run

Re: [tor-relays] Jump in brute force complaints

ases their firewalls etc. obviously works, so my message to them, if any, would be "Welcome to the internet...". Apart from ssh brutes I have had a few autogenerated complaints from valuehost.ru. On 4 January 2015 at 05:27, Kura wrote: > I've noticed a rather large jump in ab

[tor-relays] Jump in brute force complaints

a jump in abuse complaints? Curious as to whether it's a spike in the network being used for abuse, more admits reading logs or just my luck.  -- Kura t: @kuramanga [https://twitter.com/kuramanga] w: https://kura.io/ [https://kura.io/] g: @kura [http://git.io/kura]___

Re: [tor-relays] Location of Tor relays being incorrectly reported in Atlas

This is bound to happen a fair bit now with the final allocations of blocks as IPv4 started running out, I have a b unch of servers that the GEOIP database lists as being in UK, Russia and various other places where they actually aren't. =D -- Kura t: @kuramanga [https://twitte

Re: [tor-relays] Reduced number of HSDir's

. -- Kura t: @kuramanga [https://twitter.com/kuramanga] w: https://kura.io/ [https://kura.io/] g: @kura [http://git.io/kura] On 02/01/2015 18:30:00, Austin Bentley wrote: No clue. I wonder if there's some backlash from a anti-attack mechanism of some sort? There was a few attempted attacks agains

Re: [tor-relays] High speed exit question

Yeah I have read both of those and I wasn't expecting it to be instant, I have many relays that are ~6 months in age so I know about the ramp up. Thanks thought. =) -- Kura t: @kuramanga [https://twitter.com/kuramanga] w: https://kura.io/ [https://kura.io/] g: @kura [http://git.io/kura]

Re: [tor-relays] High speed exit question

Thanks for the replies, I'll run multiple instances from one box then. =) -- Kura t: @kuramanga [https://twitter.com/kuramanga] w: https://kura.io/ [https://kura.io/] g: @kura [http://git.io/kura] On 02/01/2015 16:05:44, Sebastian Urbach wrote: Hi Kura, On January 2, 2015 4:58:42 PM

[tor-relays] High speed exit question

e I'm missing something but, running multiple Tor processes is just going to have multiple relays with different OR and Dir ports for each, right? -- Kura t: @kuramanga [https://twitter.com/kuramanga] w: https://kura.io/ [https://kura.io/] g: @kura [http://g