Re: [tor-relays] Slow exit node over VPN

lt;https://bittit.info/publicDro/signature.html> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Tschador wrote: > On 2013-09-29 20:47, Konstantinos Asimakis wrote: > > > Bridge on a dynamic IP? Does that even work? > > Sure! > > > ___

Re: [tor-relays] Slow exit node over VPN

Bridge on a dynamic IP? Does that even work? - My full signature with lots of links etc.<https://bittit.info/publicDro/signature.html> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Grozdan wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Konstantinos Asimakis > wrote: > >&

[tor-relays] Slow exit node over VPN

Hello everyone. I am usually connecting to the internet through VPN (Mullvad). Would it make sense to setup an exit relay to run whenever I can? I can forward one or two ports to my machine. My IP may change often and I might have to shut down the node when I need the bandwidth for something else.

Re: [tor-relays] How to block IP address on exit node relay

Also I believe you have to add this "reject" BEFORE any "allow" lines in your torrc (if any). The parsing just stops at the first match, so if an "allow" is matched before this "reject", the traffic will be allowed. - My full signature with lots of links etc.

Re: [tor-relays] What if my favorite online store websiteblacklists all Tor Relay IP addresses?

Chuck do you run Tor on a separate machine to do that? Or have you found some way to pass only your Tor traffic through the VPN? Cheers. - My full signature with lots of links etc. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Chuck Bevitt wrote: > I run

Re: [tor-relays] My Relay has slowed significantly.

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: > > Hello, > > It looks like your node got the "Guard" status - google around for what > that > means, or wait for someone to explain. When that happens, your traffic > drops > significantly, and it can take weeks or months till it recovers to

Re: [tor-relays] Hello guys. Is is possible to choose one's Entry Guards?

out relays or hidden service operators anymore (and I'm not even sure if this list is for hidden service operators either). Cheers. On 09/01/2013 11:35 PM, "Coyo" wrote: > On 1/9/2013 2:57 PM, Coyo wrote: > > On 1/9/2013 4:41 AM, Konstantinos Asimakis wrote: > >

Re: [tor-relays] Hello guys. Is is possible to choose one's Entry Guards?

First of all, AFAIK, bridge relays act as entry guards, meaning they *replace* the first step of your tor circuits, they don't extend them to 4 nodes. With that in mind you might be able to do this: your client -> bridge (obfuscated or not) -> tor node B -> tor node C -> whatever (clearnet / intro

Re: [tor-relays] Mystery of bridge utilization

More private pool? Meaning which pool exactly? (I'm expecting something in the lines of "I could tell you but I'd have to kill you") On Apr 2, 2012 10:31 AM, "Runa A. Sandvik" wrote: > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Steve Snyder > wrote: > > I've got 2 bridges, with 1 IP address in each of 2 s

Re: [tor-relays] Questions about exit enclaves

I bet it will bypass the firewall but until someone else answers play it safe and allow only the ports you need. ;-) On Mar 30, 2012 5:58 PM, "Tom Ritter" wrote: > On 30 March 2012 10:50, Konstantinos Asimakis wrote: > > Wouldn't it be safer to accept connections

Re: [tor-relays] Questions about exit enclaves

Wouldn't it be safer to accept connections only on port 80? Else he would be exposing the whole machine. On Mar 30, 2012 5:43 PM, "Tom Ritter" wrote: > It's my understanding that if you put the following Exit Policy in your > torrc: > > ExitPolicyRejectPrivate 0 > ExitPolicy accept 97.107.139.108