Hi Sebastian,
thank you for your quick reply.
Am 2014-01-20 14:22, schrieb Sebastian Urbach:
Of course there are systems still working on the task and probably
there will be a few more wit a complete set of results. Considering
the fact that this project is running for a few months now and base
Hi!
Am 2014-01-20 12:36, schrieb Sebastian Urbach:
Just made a count and the sad truth is that 35 out of 167 systems in
total completed the task ending with a regular slash24-220.scamper
entry. Thats even worse than i expected and way more completed test
results are necessary...
I am just won
Hi,
I am also quite new to Tor but I want to point out a few things that you
might want to think about:
a) When you run a server, then you should be aware that there are a lot
of evil people out there who scan the servers to attack them. So it is
really important to have some basic knowledge
like client functionality is working.
With kind regards,
Konrad
--
Konrad Neitzel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
choosing the servers to use. So even if a client connects to your
server then the creation of the circuit will fail and the client will
build up some other circuit instead.
But as a I tried to said before: I am not an expert so far. It is just
my understanding which could be completly wrong
software does not need to do anything.
The person who builds the "package" decides about the details e.g. what
is the application allowed to access.
This is my personal view on windows - be aware that I might have missed
something.
With kind regards,
Konrad
--
Konrad Neitzel
signatur
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 23:40 -0400, krishna e bera wrote:
> On 13-10-08 03:23 PM, Jesse Victors wrote:
> > ...
> > obviously has implications into other Tor users, the vast majority of
> > whom use Tor for legal and proper activities.
> Could you give some evidence for what "vast majority" means
Hi!
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 22:55 +0200, Grozdan wrote:
First thank you all for your quick assistance. After fixing my typing
error everything works fine again. I will keep the installation I have
right now but when new versions will be available I will consider to
switch to a rpm instead.
But at t
Hi!
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 15:00 -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 08:42:51PM +0200, Konrad Neitzel wrote:
> > So I modified the /etc/security/limits.conf and added:
> > * softnofile 65000
> > * softnofile
Hi all,
I am running a tor node (idkneitzel) on a linux server (using opensuse
12.3).
Today I saw:
Oct 01 14:20:34.000 [warn] Failing because we have 8163 connections
already. Please raise your ulimit -n.
So I modified the /etc/security/limits.conf and added:
* softnofile
Hi all.
Thank you for the quick replies. I understood, that there is no need to
change the node configuration regarding these points.
Even that I am not in focus right now: I am really thinking about
further steps that I would like to do (And at the moment I think about
ways how I could explain e
Hi all!
On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 19:29 -0400, t...@t-3.net wrote:
> Also. It makes me wonder things when, for example, you say "Think
> bigger" while pointing to a couple of potential dollars in someone's
> pocket. Safeguarding the operators of the exit relays is a bigger deal
> than chump change. I
12 matches
Mail list logo
