(e.g. the UK) that can
> force you to hand over encryption keys. I'd rather have an insecure Tor
> node than get arrested (although tbh with fail2ban installed I don't think
> pwd bruteforcing is a threat).
>
>
>
>
> On 18/11/14 17:46, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
&g
Fail2Ban works really well. Shifting to a non standard port only stops the
scriptkids from having too much automated options and does not do anything
for actual security. For this reason I personally never bothered with that.
Non standard username and password auth with fail2ban makes brute forcing
Is there any paticular reason the bandwidth graph flatlined since last
night?
My ISP may have had some maintenance but my TOR relay is purring like a
kitten again, data throughput is quite formidable at the moment at around
1mbps.
I use orbot on android.
>With that in mind, he does raise a valid point. Are there any plans to
move
>to a more decentralised model for the directory authorities? Are their any
>plans to move the power to blacklist nodes out of the hands of the Tor
Project
>and into the hands of its users somehow.
This is pretty intere
How does one establish trust online though? Trust is a very delicate thing.
A system such as this simply inherently has these challenges. Pretty sure
that is why the tor browser for example always uses https.
Op 21:26 vr 7 nov. 2014 schreef grarpamp :
> Is it not time to establish a node operator
