It is more about understanding peripheral issues which are
more subtle. Fortunately, using Tor Browser effectively isn't as difficult as
some would suggest, once one gets a basic idea of managing identities and the
like.
All the best,
Duncan
On 28 December 2017 11:55:29 CET, Kenneth Freem
dawuud:
>
>> I think it is worth remembering that there isn't evidence there is a
>> global passive adversary at the moment, even if certain agencies and
>> organizations clearly aspire to be one.
>
> Quite so. It is well established that these so called agencies do not
> aspire to be passive. Or
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan D. Proulx:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 02:36:00PM +0000, Duncan wrote:
> :Hi Jonathan,
> :
> :Jonathan Proulx:
> :>
> :> To the initial question for a honest operator who's open about their
> :> ownership and enters proper family membership
ors (suspicious relays of which are
frequently thrown off the Tor network).
Best,
Duncan
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hi Dennis,
In case you've been asleep under some accursed rock for the last couple
of years, let's get some things straight:
As benevolent Tor exit operators, we care a lot about our users'
privacy. We choose to log as little as possible, and to ensure the
security of the servers of our Tor relay
stly keep in mind that these settings apply to traffic
both up and down - i.e. you'll get 2048 kilobytes/second up and 2048
kilobytes/second down.
It's worth noting that there may be some confusion between
kilobits/second and kilobytes/second.
It is probably worth using
t, one supposes!
So your home relay is at least adding to that, depending on where you
live.
Thanks for running a relay,
Duncan
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Firstly, a note of caution: I am not affiliated with the Tor project.
Scott Bennett:
Duncan wrote:
In theory hot-patching kernels is a great idea.
However, they're technically not loading a new kernel. Something like
kexec in theory lets one load a new kernel.
Furthermore, thes
In theory hot-patching kernels is a great idea.
However, they're technically not loading a new kernel. Something like
kexec in theory lets one load a new kernel.
Furthermore, these hot-patching programs usually only support Linux. If
we want to increase the diversity of the Tor network, as we
er reading the manual and reloading the Tor
service.
Best,
Duncan
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
This is not any kind of evidence to suggest a rise in abuse mails
resulting from fail2ban.
Keepyourprivacy:
I can‘t talk about the source, but there are indeed more and more
script kiddies out there who use Tor or VPNs just to test around. They
hook up Linux Kali and thinking they are becoming
Hi,
I've realized the meaning of your "anonymous" DNS:
I see you're also running two tor "exits". I write "exit" in inverted
commas because you're only allowing port 53 open:
172.98.193.43 corresponds to
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/5E56738E7F97AA81DEEF59AF28494293DFBFCCDF
162.248.241.
Hi "Dennis",
I'm all for nameservers aimed at anonymous usage, albeit run in a
democratic and transparent manner.
However, your mail is enough to arouse significant suspicion.
One would suggest that a legitimate project like this would post to
public Tor mailing lists or similar places. You coul
ctions to this
extent.
Best wishes,
Duncan
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
ere,
no doubt. At any rate, I am unsure how it demonstrates that we need
known people to run relays.
Best,
Duncan.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
tails/29C92C854E0F6652A77F3A8B231D6932993969E8
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/2CA4B2F36C2DDECFCB0B5A0D3300ED30E68E2D62
Paul
Regards,
Duncan.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
On 24.04.2017 12:30, Jonathan Marquardt wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:16:23PM +0200, unpublished wrote:
3. How to change the end node of the country (eg country from which I
am
POLAND)?
Here's a simple guide on how to do that:
http://www.wikihow.com/Set-a-Specific-Country-in-a-Tor-Browser
Hi
I went to install a new relay today and found the guide on torproject.org
had changed. I used to follow this page:
https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-relay-debian.html.en and where it says
: If you're on Ubuntu or if you want to track newer Tor packages, follow
the Tor on Ubuntu or Debian ins
Hi,
There is no reason why this would not be possible. They are just VMs,
after all. Certainly you'll get the isolation that VMs provide, but
always keep in mind that nothing is infalliable.
However, unless you have your personal computer on all the time (I
certainly don't, since it is a waste of
Hi
This seems like it would centralize some of the network. There are
already concerns about regular data-centers being able to access Tor
relays - someone malicious (yourself, someone compelling you, another
party etc) could then have access to lots of Tor relays at once, for
good or ill.
Have y
I am interested in this as well. I am thinking of installing a new bridge
on Digital Ocean in Singapore. Considering geographical location is there a
preferred pluggable transport?
P.S. I'm new to the list. Computer hobbyist. I've used Linux for 15+ years
almost exclusively but I'm no where near a
the relay to change
location listing like this?
Thanks,
Duncan
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Indeed.
In every Tor user there is a seething anarcho-capitalist.
On 09/12/16 01:58, niftybunny wrote:
Are there any “special” t-shirts for the 1%?
markus
Hi,
Jon is distributing t-shirts and Christmas cheer this year.
Have you been naughty or nice?
And by the way, it's SanTor, not San
in Africa and Asia should be a priority right now.
Duncan
On 8 December 2016 9:53:11 am GMT+00:00, Chris Adams
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I want to start up another exit node. I have a few choices for which
>country it's in. I currently live in a country with quite a high exit
>nod
t;On Wed, Dec 7, 2016, at 23:45, Duncan Guthrie wrote:
>
>> The problem with Facebook is that their policies on real names
>> somewhat goes against hiding from a repressive regime. Their terms
>and
>> conditions mandate that they kick people who use pseudonyms, and make
>
ve regimes, but people who have little to fear
from using Tor.
Duncan
On 7 December 2016 3:20:05 pm GMT+00:00, Rana wrote:
>
>
>-Original Message-
>> From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On
>Behalf Of heartsucker
>> Sent: Wednesday, De
What I was originally getting at was that the parts of the Raspberry Pi
that are completely proprietary - while there is a free software
implementation of the GPU blob, most people don't use that, as they are
on stock Rasbian, which includes all the nasty "other parts" - are a
great possibility
is hardly the case. Computers are so widespread that an old desktop
system with even twice the power of the Pi can be had for buttons.
There is no need to be rude about the suggestions that people on this
list make.
Duncan
___
tor-relays mailing list
On 06/12/16 21:10, SuperSluether wrote:
I don't know the actual numbers for the Raspberry Pi 1, I was just
quoting from Duncan:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2016-December/011182.html
I was told this figure by a friend who tried networking "stuff" on a Pi.
ound 1MB/s tops. The ethernet port is basically held on
by the equivalent of a piece of string! They're suitable for a small
mail or web server, or some sort of network probe, but not really for
any large application.
Duncan
___
tor-relays mai
e to contribute to the
network in this small way? Or at least, having a mostly dynamic IP -
some devices change their IP address more frequently than others, if my
understanding is correct?
Duncan
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torpr
All the information is on that page.
You will get the quickest and most relevant support from the IRC channel.
On 22 November 2016 00:25:24 GMT+00:00, Kevin Zvilt
wrote:
>I apologize for hijacking the thread. I just need to know how to
>contact
>the support team.
>
>On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:0
Hi Kevin,
If you need some support, there are lots of friendly and intelligent people on
IRC - #tor on OFTC - who might be able to help you. You shouldn't have to wait
too long for a response.
--
Duncan
On 18 November 2016 23:46:41 GMT+00:00, Kevin Zvilt
wrote:
>Oh, sorry. i'
Hi folks,
I am not sure it is more secure. What are we trying to protect here? As long as
the relay is running,it is unencrypted. Disk encryption only prevents physical
access - are you at risk of this? At any rate, the relay shouldn't be storing
personal data.
Having it encrypted also makes
Um, did you mean to reply to this thread?
On 24 October 2016 15:32:08 BST, tor admin wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:20:06PM +0200, Volker Mink wrote:
>>Mine is running for close to two years now and i got 2 regular
>complaints
>>with specific accusation (torrent...) from known german
Hi folks,
I think this is a very extreme and unnecessary solution. While it is good to
keep relays up, this may be unreliable. It is good to perform maintenance
regularly, and reboots are often best.
Also, it appears to be proprietary technology. I would not advise proprietary
technology on a T
Hi there,
More likely, they just compromise your relay in runtime.
Reflashing the boot firmware is theoretical, but due to the huge variation in
the hardware running Tor, I am not convinced using such an exploit on vast
numbers of computers is entirely practical. Since relays are up for months
Couldn't they run a regular relay node instead? This would help them blend in
their traffic so to speak while also not having to put themselves at risk of
being cut off.
On 6 September 2016 04:47:41 BST, Dave Warren wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 5, 2016, at 11:24, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/
38 matches
Mail list logo
