[tor-relays] Article: The Growing Problem of Malicious Relays on the Tor Network

y the tor project and how can we as organizations and operators support it best regards Dirk Tor support team digitale-gesellschaft.ch [1] https://medium.com/@nusenu/the-growing-problem-of-malicious-relays-on-the-tor-network-2f14198af548 ___ tor-re

Re: [tor-relays] Blocking outbound 22 or no?

the end we disabled port 22. After all - any sysadmin who wants to have peace and ever looked a ssh config will have its listen port somewhere else than 22. best regards Dirk On 05.10.2017 19:08, AMuse wrote: > Hi all!  I'm getting a number of ISP Abuse complaints around outbound >

Re: [tor-relays] Two-step abuse management?

this seems to be the setting of fail2ban which checks also the network abuse record. best regards Dirk On 13.09.2017 15:49, Moritz Bartl wrote: > Hi! > > tl;dr: We're thinking about introducing an auto responder to abuse mail > which then requires clicking a link or replying

Re: [tor-relays] Was: New here -> new Relay offline but process is running

-00-vote-EFCBE720AB3A82B99F9E953CD5BF50F7EEFC7B97-BEB84799E48C9911E040B5DA6B11EC5281886128 The problem here is. Since the process is running neiter my scripts nor systemd will try to restart it. best regards Dirk On 14.08.2017 05:08, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 08:5

Re: [tor-relays] New Here

Hello, I observed the same thing on our new exit. atlas says its down - but actually it is working. Did you test if you could exit through your relay at this time ? best regards Dirk On 11.08.2017 16:28, Paul Templeton wrote: > Another odd thin is atlas will say its down for say three ho

Re: [tor-relays] significant rise in fail2ban alerts for ssh abuse

the network operator. Any hint where this improved fail2ban config comes from is welcome. best regards Dirk On 10.08.2017 22:15, Keepyourprivacy wrote: > I can‘t talk about the source, but there are indeed more and more > script kiddies out there who use Tor or VPNs just to test around

[tor-relays] significant rise in fail2ban alerts for ssh abuse

in numbers. best regards Dirk Example 1 Dear Sir/Madam, We have detected abuse from the IP address 1.1.1.x, which according to a whois lookup is on your network. We would appreciate if you would investigate and take action as appropriate. Log lines are given below, but please ask if you

Re: [tor-relays] Memory Problems with tor releay - restart tor automatically after failure

throughput it feels like a dirty solution to do this auto restart. best regards Dirk p.s. Nusenu - it seem onionoo responds better now - was there a solution to the problem On 25.05.2017 10:54, nusenu wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > I noticed your comment [1] about your plans to write a script

Re: [tor-relays] Memory Problems with tor releay

Hello Roger, I updated the ticket. You will find the output of the valgrind there as well: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/22255/valgrind.txt best regards Dirk On 23.05.2017 06:00, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 03:01:10AM +, John Ricke

Re: [tor-relays] Memory Problems with tor releay

Hello Roger, thanks for the Feedback. We do not have super fast but at least Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 v3 @ 3.10GHz Since our processes keep falling over (started them 12 hours ago and now they are dead again) I think I can and give valgrind a try tonight. best regards Dirk On 23.05.2017

[tor-relays] Memory Problems with tor releay

the problem will go away. best regards Dirk [1] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/22255 [2]https://twitter.com/FrennVunDerEnn/status/864583496072876034 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https

Re: [tor-relays] tornull

cking and confirming each entry is needed." Who is behind tornull ? And how are they validating their negative list ? It might help some relays on difficult providers like Digital Ocean but in the end it is a censorship which makes part of the internet unavailabe to tor users. best regards

Re: [tor-relays] tornull

It was two days ago. Today I can not reach it as well. best regards Dirk On 01.05.2017 08:08, scar wrote: > I was unable to reach the site, is it still in operation? > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproj

[tor-relays] tornull

st regards Dirk [1] https://tornull.org/ [2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy [3] https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL113323 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-b

Re: [tor-relays] Shutdown of TorLand1

Hi torland, thank you very much for all your efforts. best regards Dirk On 15.02.2017 22:55, tor-ad...@torland.is wrote: > Hi all, > > after 5 years of operation I will shutdown TorLand1 > (https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/E1E922A20AF608728824A620BADC6EFC8CB8C2B8) > &

Re: [tor-relays] Reaching out to webiron

regarding their big problems with tor - but nothing came ever back. They are just complaining - reasoning won't help. Save you time for more important stuff. best regards Dirk On 08.02.2017 08:59, DaKnOb wrote: > Incidentally yesterday I published a blog post featuring them and why >

Re: [tor-relays] Updating our IP Address

some more information about you use case/configuration best regards Dirk On 20.12.2016 15:25, diffusae wrote: > Hi! > > Yesterday I encountered a strange IP address update via DynDNS: > > Dec 19 23:00:32.000 [notice] Your IP address seems to have changed to > 176.10.104.2

Re: [tor-relays] Webiron

ally look after the abuse complaint. best regards Dirk On 29.01.2016 15:09, Josef Stautner wrote: > Hi, > > I responded them the first few times. After I got angry about automated > abuse I ignored them. > Just answering your ISP is fine. > > ~Josef > > Am 29.01.20

Re: [tor-relays] Unused Tor exit nodes capacity

ally >if you decide to paste your logs on a public mailing list. Sure - nothing in there which is a problem. :-) Thanks again for helping. best regards dirk ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/

Re: [tor-relays] Unused Tor exit nodes capacity

. Removing stream. I get very much of these. It does not look healthy to me. Is this normal ? Again many thanks for your help. best regards Dirk On 14.12.2015 00:06, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > >> On 14 Dec 2015, at 07:18, Dirk Eschbach > <mailto:tor-relay.d...@o.banes.ch>>

[tor-relays] Unused Tor exit nodes capacity

ized. What are the criteria for tor exit node server traffic distribution ? How do the clients choose the exit ? I would be very happy if you could provide some answers / documentation which will set me on the right track. Thanks very much for you help. Dirk [1] https://globe.torproject.org/#/se