> On Sep 5, 2019, at 10:21 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>
>> never relied on the OS Package of Tor, mainly because OS’s OpenSSL versions
>> are behind the current version of OpenSSL, so I normally compile Tor against
>> the latest OpenSSL. Example, FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE has OpenSSL
>> 1.1.1a-freebsd, whi
nd the current version of OpenSSL, so I normally compile Tor against the
latest OpenSSL. Example, FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE has OpenSSL 1.1.1a-freebsd, which
generates a slight crypto error during the startup of Tor. If you download
OpenSSL 1.1.1c and just compile against it, eh, problem fix
Hello,
I was wondering if Rob would be willing to perform speed measurements on this
node, it’s. 20 vcpu running CentOS 7 with manually compiled Tor against OpenSSL
1.1.1 on a 30Gbit link. I know it’s not going to see all of that bandwidth,
it’s meant as a high powered VM platform because my in
would say this, a friend of mine who previously worked with the US IC
says run Unbound or use trusted DNS.
Thanks,
Conrad Rockenhaus
https://www.greyponyit.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-re
instance running under the Openstack framework.
Thanks,
Conrad Rockenhaus
http://www.greyponyit.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Hello,
Onionoo returns “unknown” for my ASN for some reason (should return 63080) and
returns “unknown” for AS Name (Should be GreyPony Consultants - as named in
ARIN). I’m trying to find out where things might be potentially breaking here
before I start connecting to the route servers at DE-CI
Hello,
My bust, confirmation bias.
Thanks,
Conrad
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:45 PM teor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 24 May 2019, at 14:08, Conrad Rockenhaus
> wrote:
> >
> > In April 2018 Google released an update that caused VPNs and Tor
> services to stop working o
Hi,
I apologize for top posting, but it’ll be the simplest way to convey the
message.
In April 2018 Google released an update that caused VPNs and Tor services to
stop working on GCE and App Engine. It was a long planned network update.
The following ticket refers:
https://trac.torproject.org
> On May 16, 2019, at 10:31 PM, Keifer Bly wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> So I am running a new tor middle relay via a Google Cloud VPS but after the
> relay running for 1 day I am seeing this error
>
> May 16 18:23:50.000 [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the
> cached consensus.
>
Ha
> On May 23, 2019, at 3:54 AM, tor-re...@riseup.net wrote:
>
> I think that a network based to much on remotes VMs, with closed source
> software running on the most deep machine level, is not very resilient and
> secure.
>
Actually, it’s very secure. By default, Tor doesn’t log anything but
> On May 22, 2019, at 1:24 AM, tor-re...@riseup.net wrote:
>
> Hello dear friends
>
> I'm running a non exit relay on a debian machine (in the next few months I
> will switch to *BSD) on a Lime2. I'm running an exit relay too on a remote VM.
>
> I would turn my non-exit relay in an exit one,
> On May 17, 2019, at 6:16 PM, findmei wrote:
>
> Thank you for replying to my mail.
>
> Damn it. My isp is blocking me. Is it possible to run this node in some way?
>
Do you happen to know if you have a transparent proxy in your path to the
internet from your box? Run “curl ifconfig.me” do
n
with the accounting and everything.
--
Conrad Rockenhaus
https://www.rockenhaus.com
Cell: (254) 292-3350
Fax: (254) 875-0459
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
adise again. No, i go my own way. Guys
> like you are not trustworthy.
>
> Olaf
>
>
> Am 28.04.19 um 10:34 schrieb Conrad Rockenhaus:
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 5:49 PM Seby wrote:
> >> Here we go again...
> >> This dude just won't stop harassing us
ng to something and ignoring things you disagree with or
asking questions if you don't understand it, instead of just resorting
to talking trash about a project. I just makes it look like you have
plenty of free time to mock others because you aren't helping o
Nope, not really.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 6:57 AM Old Man Tor
wrote:
> So, did I call it? Or did I call it
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:29 AM, Conrad Rockenhaus <
> ad...@rockenhaus.com> wrote:
>
> For a small donation i
For a small donation in relation to the number of physical CPUs (and x
cores each) plus bandwidth you want, (mbp/s or gbp/s) I can provide you
your own instance on my OpenStack cloud that I just built out on AS19624.
No exit policy restrictions, I handle all abuse complaints, so you won’t
have to w
of throughput –
> without AES-NI, around 100 Mbps.
>
> --
> Ciao Marco!
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
--
Conrad Rockenhaus
https://www.rockenhaus.co
Is their a need for any more FallbackDirs?
Thanks,
Conrad
--
Conrad Rockenhaus
https://www.rockenhaus.com
Cell: (254) 292-3350
Fax: (254) 875-0459
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin
wrote:
>
> On 4/4/19, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
> > I have a FreeBSD box on a 1 Gbit/s connection. I'm trying to determine
> > if we need more high speed relays or high speed exit relays. The AS
> > it's on has no plain relays, just exit relays. That's what has me
&
wayside since it's kind of hard to computer when you
> can't computer :P.
>
> Anyway, I've been home for the past few weeks and starting to get back
> into my old hobbies again. I brought two new exit relays up in NYC,
> one Linux, and one FreeBSD on 1 Gb/s Links. I have
t be an exit or just a plain relay?
Thanks,
Conrad
--
Conrad Rockenhaus
https://www.rockenhaus.com
Cell: (254) 292-3350
Fax: (254) 875-0459
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
> _______
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
--
Conrad Rockenhaus
https://www.rockenhaus.com
Cell: (254) 292-3350
Fax: (254) 875-0459
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
d make an
exit relay or just a regular relay.
Relay names - greyponyitnyc001 and greyponyitnyc002.
I hope everyone is having a good day!
--
Conrad Rockenhaus
https://www.rockenhaus.com
Cell: (254) 292-3350
Fax: (254) 875-0459
___
tor-relays mai
Would you make a recommendation of running unbound on the local exit nodes to
resolve local DNS server congestion to get around this issue?
Thanks,
Conrad
> On Oct 19, 2018, at 5:30 PM, nusenu wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Dear Exit relay operators,
>
> (you are getting this email because you
Hello,
I’m researching for a new colo, and in order to bring it online until I can
consolidate some hardware, I would like to temporarily run a VyOS Router as the
main router so I can start getting things online sooner than later. This VyOS
Router will be running BGP with the upstream providers
Thank you everyone for the well wishes. I have been discharged from the
hospital and I’m recovering slowly at home. I appreciate all of the kind notes
that I received and again, thank you.
Regards,
Conrad
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_
S7R,
I emailed you privately with evidence hoping you would retract your statement.
Unfortunately, you’ve decided to not reply, so I’ll gladly post a redacted copy
of the court order to my blog:
https://www.rockenhaus.com/2018/09/hey-now-court-order.html as well as respond
to some of your fine
> On Sep 8, 2018, at 7:35 PM, teor wrote:
>
>
> On 9 Sep 2018, at 09:52, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
>
>> Greypony received its first Court Order yesterday. Unfortunately, we have no
>> records to provide since it was a Tor Exit, and we don’t even have records
&g
Greypony received its first Court Order yesterday. Unfortunately, we have no
records to provide since it was a Tor Exit, and we don’t even have records of
who owned that relay at that IP address because we don’t keep records of the
info. Oops.
It’s a pretty broad Court Order, and kind of funny.
g to melt
processors. It’s all fun to discuss in theory, but in the end, that’s not
what’s happening in the real world.
Conrad
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Gary.
>
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 02:26, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
> Gary,
>
> It’s bad in the same way it’s ba
versity then I apologise for my misunderstanding of the
> topic.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 at 00:12, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
> Hi teor,
>
> It seems the criticism originated from one guy (Ralph) and one troll who
> bravely refuses to id
I know this is an issue of semantics here, but when you say “Tor Exit in Turkey
censoring access to various access to various websites” you’re kind of putting
the onus on them directly instead of the repressive anti-free speech regime
that they are operating the the exit under. Why not be more c
Here’s OVH’s non-response:
Start OVH
Thank you for contacting OVH with regards to BGP hijacking; we apologize for
the delay in response.
From the current status of discussion on the subject, it appears implementing
ROA / RPKI is still in development but not a priority; I am afraid at the
m
yahoos?
Thanks,
Conrad
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:37 PM teor wrote:
> Hi Conrad (and staff and operators),
>
> > On 28 Aug 2018, at 22:16, Conrad Rockenhaus
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:02 PM, Jordan wrote:
> >>
>
Good God every conversation, now. Anyway.
This exit isn’t bad exit material. Turkey has been known to block Tor though,
I’m actually proud of this guy for having the cajones (also known as balls to
those of you who don’t habla espanol) to operate an exit in country such as
Turkey, which absolut
The website is old and has been updated. We are providing up do 100 MiB/s now.
Thanks,
Conrad
> On Aug 28, 2018, at 7:16 AM, livak wrote:
>
> 10 MiB/s may right for me, but I would try to get
> as much bandwidth as I could, up to the 10% of the
> consensus weight limit criteria.
>
> Livak
>
Hi Livak,
Yes, there are compiled tor relay packages for BSD, they exist in packages -
for FreeBSD is pkg install tor and for OpenBSD it’s pkg_add tor.
For FreeBSD, you’ll want to switch packages from quarterly to latest prior to
installing tor though.
You may also compile from source - the po
> On Aug 27, 2018, at 8:02 PM, Jordan wrote:
>
>> Tor will already avoid making circuits where two IP Addresses in the same
>> /24 are involved. The research in this paper
>> (https://www.freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/DBLP:conf/ccs/EdmanS09.pdf) is
>> becoming more relevent and is worth discuss
The trial period was for 30 days for one server. You were able to try out three
servers at the same time. WHMCS calculated your trial period at 10 days and
scheduled your instances for deletion.
You didn’t even give me half of a day before you started acting paranoid that
your instances were de
> On Aug 26, 2018, at 12:43 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>
> On 8/26/18, nusenu wrote:
>> Conrad Rockenhaus:
>>> I just wanted to say congratulations to Nullvoid, who is currently running
>>> the second fastest exit in France in my colo in Europe.
>
>> a
I just wanted to say congratulations to Nullvoid, who is currently running the
second fastest exit in France in my colo in Europe.
https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/51420DFB2047A33803A9A6E456D627937DD6E316
Also, go FreeBSD!
Thanks,
Conrad
signature.asc
Description: Message signe
> On Aug 25, 2018, at 6:56 PM, Paul Templeton wrote:
>
>
>> About finding sponsors for high speed exits, it could be nice
>> to gather ideas.
>
> Can I ask what is a high speed/capacity exit? For me it would be >10MiB/s am
> I correct?
>
> Paul
I’m not advertising, but I run a nonprofit org
OVH Ticket Number 6993458396 created.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> On Aug 25, 2018, at 8:39 AM, livak wrote:
>
> Thanks "I",
>
> About finding sponsors for high speed exits, it could be nice
> to gather ideas.
> On the other side, if someone wants to contact me to develop
> the idea, I'm ready for it.
>
> Livak
>
>
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
>
> On Aug 24, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
>
> On 2018-08-23 17:56, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
>> This mainly seemed to be an issue of miscommunication - I had one party that
>> I was in communication with at the beginning who said that this was going to
>> b
> On Aug 23, 2018, at 6:20 PM, I wrote:
>
> When I've met the same attitude I've had some luck by immediately saying they
> could wipe the hard drive to exterminate all devils, and even give me a
> different ip address, to show my interest in keeping our relationship going.
> I told them tor
Bynum Law Office
> 708 Main Street
> Houston, Texas 77002
> Dial “713 LAW FIRM”
> +1 713 529-3476
>
>> On Aug 23, 2018, at 07:51, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
>>
>> So, new equipment gets plugged into a colo…. I’m a dude that was looking to
>> increase
So, new equipment gets plugged into a colo…. I’m a dude that was looking to
increase AS diversity on Tor and well, decided to add a new colo to the mix.
Two exit relays are brought online on properly SWIPed IP addresses. These exit
relays have only been online for about 24 hours.
An organizatio
Would you like to trial a FreeBSD Relay on Cogent until October 1st?
Yes, it has to be FreeBSD, because I use Bhyve as my hypervisor and some of my
blades don’t support UG, which means, I support FreeBSD only on these series of
servers.
If you’re interested in a Model “A” (25GB HDD, 1vCPU, 2GB
On Friday, July 27, 2018 3:32:28 AM CDT Dmitrii Tcvetkov wrote:
> Since 25.07.2018 I'm running Tor exit relay
> BBF17F784433635FA28E7E585D05FE3B15A31A6B on FreeBSD VPS. Although
> AS16276 is quite crowded, fact that IP address space is SWIPed to Conrad
> Rockenhaus means that I,
RSA key and I will create an
instance for you.
Thanks,
Conrad
--
Conrad Rockenhaus
https://www.rockenhaus.com
--
Get started with GreyPony Anonymization Today!
https://www.greyponyit.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
AM Conrad Rockenhaus
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:10 PM, nusenu wrote:
> >
> >
> > Conrad Rockenhaus:
> >> 1 vCPU
> >> 2 GB RAM
> >> 30 GB Disk
> >> 10 mbit/Unlimited Traffic
> >>
> >> I'll adjust the numbers a
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:10 PM, nusenu wrote:
>
>
> Conrad Rockenhaus:
>> 1 vCPU
>> 2 GB RAM
>> 30 GB Disk
>> 10 mbit/Unlimited Traffic
>>
>> I'll adjust the numbers as I assess demand, I just don't want a
>> potential high level
ostname.greyponyit.com or hostname.yourdomainname.com please let me
know that as well. I should have that part somewhat automated at some
point as well, just trying to get things off the ground.
Thanks,
Conrad
--
Conrad Rockenhaus
Get started with GreyPony Anonymization Today!
h
ay through a set of
> shell scripts. It's still in development, but just as you do, they run
> everything in BSD boxes.
>
> Cheers!
>
> [1]: https://emeraldonion.org/introducing-gibson/
>
>
>
> Original Message ----
>
> On Jul 19, 2018, 09
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:10 PM, teor wrote:
>
>> On 19 Jul 2018, at 11:34, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
>>
>> To the point - would it be fair to network stability to offer a week
>> long free trial to run a tor instance, well, that is if that's what
>> the u
Howdy,
So, anyway, I was previously more active, but I decided on a midlife
career change and was on a training path to become a Physician
Assistant. Then I was hit by a drunk driver. Now I had to drop out of
the program for the next year at least, if at all, so I'm going back
to working IT. That'
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>
> I think that you'll find blocking bittorrent to be harder than expected.
> Modern protocols are well-encrypted, and DPI doesn't really touch them.
>
DPI was never even under consideration. I wasn't comfortable calling
it "Free Speech" when I was
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Nagaev Boris wrote:
> I think that modern copyright lays violate non aggression principle,
> which includes free speech.
As I agree, which is why I typically ignored such threats until my
provider started enforcing said threats.
> Rationale. Skip this paragrap
Hello,
> Tor is designed in such a way that you can separately decide whether or
> not you want to contribute to the network, and also whether or not you
> are willing to deal with abuse notices. This is configured via exit
> policies.
I never said that, I asked if people felt it was ethical to s
stions
against censorship on the Internet and people do torrent legitimate stuff.
I don't consider pirating Fallout 4, The Elder Scrolls V, Sweetbitter, and
The Evil Within 2 to be protected speech FYI... my worry is just blocking
the legitimate uses of bittorrent.
Thanks,
Conrad Rockenhaus
_
n - place
the keys in a ramdisk, that's actually a great idea. I'll put that into
what I'm building up right now.
Regards,
Conrad Rockenhaus
0x424F4C61.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Friday, March 2, 2018 2:22:00 PM CST George wrote:
> Matthew Finkel:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 03:01:31PM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 07:42:11PM +, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> >>> Are you running this relay at your home? If yes, then that is not
> >>> recommende
On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 6:46:00 PM CST George wrote:
> Vinícius Zavam:
> > 2018-02-25 21:23 GMT+00:00 Conrad Rockenhaus :
> >> On Sunday, February 25, 2018 3:05:00 PM CST George wrote:
> >>> Conrad Rockenhaus:
> >>>> Hello All,
> >>>
On Monday, February 26, 2018 11:24:37 AM CST Vinícius Zavam wrote:
> 2018-02-25 21:23 GMT+00:00 Conrad Rockenhaus :
> > On Sunday, February 25, 2018 3:05:00 PM CST George wrote:
> > > Conrad Rockenhaus:
> > > > Hello All,
> > > >
> > > > If
You're currently not measured, per atlas it's been only 12 hours since this
node has been online. It takes about three days to get a nominal measurement.
I had a node on a 200mbps connection sit at 0bps for two days straight, then
it finally had some movement in the evening of day three. I would
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 11:13:12 PM CST grarpamp wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:05 PM, George wrote:
> > However, I'd be wary of an image that I didn't build myself, personally.
>
> Yes, especially of image without source [script]
> (not to diminish such work).
>
> FreeBSD is largely re
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 4:03:30 PM CST Jordan wrote:
> >> Another issue is that OVH is over relied upon for public nodes. It's the
> >> leading ASN with almost 15%.
> >
> > They're one of the few providers out there that allow exits. That's why
> > 15% of our exits are on OVH.
>
> For what i
ly that helps a
little.
Thanks,
Conrad
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 4:03:00 PM CST George wrote:
> Conrad Rockenhaus:
> > On Sunday, February 25, 2018 3:05:00 PM CST George wrote:
> >> Conrad Rockenhaus:
> >>> Hello All,
> >>>
> >>> If anyone is
t; On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 09:05:00PM +0000, George wrote:
> > Conrad Rockenhaus:
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > If anyone is interested, I have a RAW image of a FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS image
> > > that is fully configured and ready to run Tor. Right now it's
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 3:08:00 PM CST nusenu wrote:
> please ensure the tor keys folder is empty in your image
>
> and SSH hostkeys are also not there (generated on first boot)
It's completely clean. It's a completely default install of tor with no keys
generated, waiting for it's first st
On Sunday, February 25, 2018 3:05:00 PM CST George wrote:
> Conrad Rockenhaus:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > If anyone is interested, I have a RAW image of a FreeBSD 11.1 ZFS image
> > that is fully configured and ready to run Tor. Right now it's an eight GB
> &g
r/src stuff.
>
> regards Steffen
> TorGate
> torgate(at)linux-hus.dk
> OpenGPG 7FD5 65EF A4EF EEF3 7A13 4372 8409 49D6 01A2 0890
>
> > Am 25.02.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Conrad Rockenhaus :
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > If anyone is interested, I hav
(it's a low
monthly rate and unlimited bandwidth).
Regards,
Conrad Rockenhaus
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
contact you is associated with
that IP address. We give up our anonymity so others may have it.
Conrad Rockenhaus
(254) 292-3350
On Feb 24, 2018, at 3:03 PM, teor wrote:
>>> Feb 24 10:45:08.000 [warn] You are running Tor as root. You don't need to,
>>> and you probably
Ok, I’m sorry but I’m trying to make sense of this,,,
You start Tor, and then your server IP changes after a certain uptime, the DNS
changes with it. So what’s the issue with accessing it if the DNS changes with
it? Do you have to use the IP address explicitly?
Thanks,
Conrad
> On Feb 11, 201
The 500 Mbps instance would either be one of my private servers in my co-lo, or
a dedicated server in one of my private cloud hosting locations. With both
contacts, bandwidth costs aren’t an issue, but if one big instance would work I
would put it on the same hardware that I am running a server
configuration, etc.
I’m just curious, because I”m getting ready to add a few more nodes, but I’m
wondering if it’ll be better to go big, or just stay small.
Thanks,
Conrad Rockenhaus
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https
Hello All,
I just brought up my third relay, ConradsOVHRelay03, as an exit. I appreciate
the feedback that everyone provided me with before and I hope that this relay
is configured perfectly. I’m glad to add more bandwidth to the cause.
Thanks,
Conrad
__
I’m ready to get node #3 up right now…so what’s the priority for high speed
nodes right now, exits or relays? Just wanted to know before I brought it
online.
This one is based in the great land of Canada :D.
Thanks,
Conrad
___
tor-relays mailing list
Have you checked your kernel socket backlog limit? (net.core.somaxconn)
> On Jan 25, 2018, at 1:19 PM, Christian Krbusek wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> recently I´m facing issues with my 4 middle relays:
>
> B1E889E8EA604D81326F5071E0ABF1B2B16D5DAB
> FC9AC8EA0160D88BCCFDE066940D7DD9FA45495B
> BDB9E
Hello,
Note - to others that have sent me emails about a proposed project, I will
respond, I’m sorry I just got caught up in a huge emergency project.
Anyway, I had a quick question, on the relay side I run ConradsOVHRelay01
(Relay) and ConradsOVHRelay02 (Exit). They’re running on CentOS, so I
I just brought a 0.3.2.8 relay online at OVH, ConradsOVHRelay,
A5C6D2EBCCA77D0B09364DD6B75FEC817AF977FA. For some reason Atlas says the
bandwidth is 0, but I have it set to 625. I guess we’ll see how it does later.
Conrad
> On Dec 22, 2017, at 8:48 AM, David Goulet wrote:
>
> On 22 Dec (00:2
Thank you. It’s always the small things, huh? :D
Conrad
> On Dec 21, 2017, at 6:12 PM, teor wrote:
>
>
>> On 22 Dec 2017, at 09:13, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
>>
>>>> I’ve confirmed that the following entries are in torrc:
>>>>
>>>>
On Dec 21, 2017, at 3:01 AM, teor <teor2...@gmail.com> wrote:On 21 Dec 2017, at 16:33, Conrad Rockenhaus <con...@rockenhaus.com> wrote:Hello,One of the relays that I brought online yesterday, ConradsAWSExit (Hash 1B47E33F9D422CC97BD2DDA1F082BFF2FC58E79A) is showing up on Atlas that th
Hello,
One of the relays that I brought online yesterday, ConradsAWSExit (Hash
1B47E33F9D422CC97BD2DDA1F082BFF2FC58E79A) is showing up on Atlas that the IPv6
OR is unreachable.
The other relay is working just fine with IPv6.
I’ve confirmed that the following entries are in torrc:
ORPort 9001
> On Dec 20, 2017, at 5:01 AM, teor wrote:
>
>
> On 20 Dec 2017, at 20:59, Conrad Rockenhaus <mailto:con...@rockenhaus.com>> wrote:
>
>> ConradsAWSRelay was started back up on a new AWS instance running Amazon
>> Linux and it’s hash is now 9F7F05699131
advise! I also appreciate the input regarding the
revitalization of the Cloud project again. Another person has also volunteered
to assist in the project so hopefully things should start moving here pretty
soon!
Thanks,
Conrad
> On Dec 19, 2017, at 9:02 PM, Conrad Rockenhaus wr
> On Dec 19, 2017, at 8:55 PM, teor wrote:
>
>
> On 20 Dec 2017, at 13:28, Conrad Rockenhaus <mailto:con...@rockenhaus.com>> wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Early this morning (3 AM CST) I brought a non-exit relay named
>> “ConradsAWSRelay” online
for rolling out tor.
Thanks,
Conrad Rockenhaus
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
volunteer to try to help out, if there's a willingness to expand it to
other providers? Thanks.
--Rock
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Conrad Rockenhaus
wrote:
> I apologize for the delay in responding, getting ready to move to
> Texas, but anyway. My original intention was to run o
t; tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
--
Conrad Rockenhaus
http://www.rockenhaus.com/
http://www.lagparty.org/~conradr/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
0, 2013 at 02:22:55PM -0500, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
>> I brought a new non-exit relay online:
>>
>> ec2bridgerocks001 D06C B145 56C1 F73A F317 B555 C279 2F7B 105C 95B4
>>
>> It's been operational for 6 days now, Tor has been reporting bandwidth
>> usag
ther.
>
> So, I'm wondering - is there something I missed in the configuration?
> The torrc is pretty much the default EC2 one.
>
> Thank you I appreciate any thoughts/assistance.
>
> Respectfully,
>
> --
> Conrad Rockenhaus
>
> http://www.rockenhaus.com/
&g
thoughts/assistance.
Respectfully,
--
Conrad Rockenhaus
http://www.rockenhaus.com/
http://www.lagparty.org/~conradr/
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
96 matches
Mail list logo
