Hi,
> On 2. Oct 2024, at 09:05, George Hartley via tor-relays
> wrote:
>
>
> It could be that your provider has throttled you temporarily.
>
> I don't think so, I get that message on a dedicated 10 GbE link with little
> to no use except for the exit relay on it.
>
> Also, if his relay publ
On 10/2/24 17:43, meskio wrote:
I think best right now is to configure them to be distributed over "settings".
As this is what will be automatically used by Tor Browser and other clients.
Thx.
--
Toralf
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.t
> It could be that your provider has throttled you temporarily.
I don't think so, I get that message on a dedicated 10 GbE link with little to
no use except for the exit relay on it.
Also, if his relay publishes it's descriptor, then why Metrics won't reflect
that?
It should show it as online
Quoting Toralf Förster via tor-relays (2024-10-02 17:07:56)
> On 10/2/24 13:03, meskio wrote:
> > Not a concrete one. My plan is to review the situation early next month and
> > depending on the usage bring the conversation on what to do with those
> > bridges
> > to our thursdays Anti-Censorship
On 10/2/24 13:03, meskio wrote:
Not a concrete one. My plan is to review the situation early next month and
depending on the usage bring the conversation on what to do with those bridges
to our thursdays Anti-Censorship meetings.
I plan to change set the bridge distribution for my 4 unassigned
Quoting admin--- via tor-relays (2024-09-20 22:49:59)
> I'm writing because I want to run a snowflake proxy in a docker container on
> a
> server with two IP addresses; the primary public IP I want the snowflake
> proxy
> hosted on, and a public anycast IP that's shared between other servers.
>
Quoting Toralf Förster via tor-relays (2024-09-30 21:24:34)
> On 9/19/24 18:46, meskio wrote:
> > We plan to watch the usage of moat bridges and evaluate moving them
> > to another distributor depending on the usage[3].
>
> Is there any timeline for the movement?
Not a concrete one. My plan is
