Re: [tor-relays] Confusing bridge signs...

2023-03-04 Thread lists
On Samstag, 4. März 2023 02:09:19 CET Keifer Bly wrote: > Wheres the pastebin page? Thanks. $websearch pastebin https://paste.debian.net/ https://paste.systemli.org/ https://pastebin.mozilla.org/ ... -- ╰_╯ Ciao Marco! Debian GNU/Linux It's free software and it gives you freedom! signature.a

Re: [tor-relays] RFC: does a private exit would work?

2023-03-04 Thread tor
Be aware that attacks against you will be possible, since any traffic coming from that IP is only used by you. Unlike normal Tor users where they blend and hide amongst each other. You will be the only exit user. A personal VPN might provide similar anonymity and be easier to manage and run. On

Re: [tor-relays] RFC: does a private exit would work?

2023-03-04 Thread shruub via tor-relays
I can only speak with anonymity in mind, since this would mean you run a "vpn" service (having a "quad-vpn", but actually one that makes sence in that its not just 4 different servers of one company). Having an access line would either mean you'd need to identify yourself (and of course it take

Re: [tor-relays] Confusing bridge signs...

2023-03-04 Thread Keifer Bly
Wheres the pastebin page? Thanks. --Keifer On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 7:47 AM wrote: > On Dienstag, 28. Februar 2023 19:02:38 CET Keifer Bly wrote: > > Yep, and after that the same still happens, it is still going offline > In the syslog is why tor aborts. > > To help you, you should post your logs

Re: [tor-relays] RFC: does a private exit would work?

2023-03-04 Thread Toralf Förster
On 3/4/23 17:29, gus wrote: What's the goal? To have a private exit that only you can use? Indeed, similar goal as for private bridges. There is this very interesting paper and project called HebTor: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3372297.3417245 Thx, so I have sth to read. -- Toralf

Re: [tor-relays] RFC: does a private exit would work?

2023-03-04 Thread gus
On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 10:28:44AM +0100, Toralf Förster wrote: > tl;dr; > restricted access + usage of an exit > > > longer: > An exit is sooner or later abused. A reduced exit policy does not prevent > that. > > What about setup a tor exit relay with 'PublishServerDescriptor = 0' ? > > Having

Re: [tor-relays] Open call for proposals for improving the health of the Tor relay operator community and the Tor network

2023-03-04 Thread gus
On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 11:26:07PM +0100, nusenu wrote: > I've got some practical experience with how things are (not) handled > by the Tor Project in this space which discourages involvement. > The past has also shown that proposals in this area are not > handled as tor proposals in the sense of [

[tor-relays] RFC: does a private exit would work?

2023-03-04 Thread Toralf Förster
tl;dr; restricted access + usage of an exit longer: An exit is sooner or later abused. A reduced exit policy does not prevent that. What about setup a tor exit relay with 'PublishServerDescriptor = 0' ? Having an access line like for bridges would restrict the access. An alternative could b