Hi Alec,
Alec Larsen:
> For the past month, I have been operating an exit node (
> 89094DFA4158C7A1583EC3A332CDCBC74A28CC0E ) from UnitedIX in Chicago, IL, US.
> The server has a dedicated gigabit port, and I had hoped to be able to relay
> around 200 TB of traffic per month, but for some reas
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 02:23:21 +
Alec Larsen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've only recently joined this list, so I apologise in advance if this is not
> the appropriate place for my question.
>
> For the past month, I have been operating an exit node (
> 89094DFA4158C7A1583EC3A332CDCBC74A28CC0E ) f
Hello,
I've only recently joined this list, so I apologise in advance if this is not
the appropriate place for my question.
For the past month, I have been operating an exit node (
89094DFA4158C7A1583EC3A332CDCBC74A28CC0E ) from UnitedIX in Chicago, IL, US.
The server has a dedicated gigabit p
I'm interested in hosting a Windows-based relay, if anyone can point me to a
good tutorial. I've tried the most common ones.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
I find it more alarming that a single exit operator handles 13% of exit
traffic than that the DNS resolution is dominated by 2 big players.
Although the DNS dependencies are bad too.
On 7/11/19 6:31 PM, nusenu wrote:
>
>
> https://medium.com/@nusenu/what-fraction-of-tors-dns-traffic-goes-to-go
Just how much traffic can one expect when running a bridge? Is it
comparable to being an entry/middle node?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
torjoy:
> Hi, this is my first post here.
>
> I'm running 3 bridges in brazil (maybe one of them becomes a
> middle-relay), so I want to know what we need here to have some
> bridge authority for example here in south america. Is too much
> different from a normal relay? I've already see the "au
