Re: [tor-relays] control who can connect me

teor: > > >> On 26 Apr 2018, at 01:33, dave` dave wrote: >> >> Thank you all for your answers. so if i can't control on the access >> to my Exit-Relay i can control on the access to my SSH which used >> to run this Exir-Relay. > > You asked in another thread how to build a circuit like: > > C

Re: [tor-relays] control who can connect me

> On 26 Apr 2018, at 01:33, dave` dave wrote: > > Thank you all for your answers. > so if i can't control on the access to my Exit-Relay i can control on the > access to my SSH which used to run this Exir-Relay. You asked in another thread how to build a circuit like: Client - Bridge - Middl

Re: [tor-relays] Can i use the same ip for Tor bridge and Exit-Relay to work together?

> On 25 Apr 2018, at 22:28, dave` dave wrote: > > hi. Thank you for your answer. > i need to add this line " EnforceDistinctSubnets 0" to the "torrc" file in > the SSH? > and if the answer is "yes" its still not working. You need to change the torrc file in your Tor client, which is Tor Brows

Re: [tor-relays] Alternative hoster (Re: DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes)

Hello, In reference to this issue, I am willing to provide an alternative solution that doesn't rely on thge big 3 remaining providers that are over saturated ASNs within the network, however, I would like to gauge how many people would be generally interested in such an endeavor before I go out a

Re: [tor-relays] traffic accounting - outbound traffic only

Tobias Sachs: > The interesting thing about Hetzer is that only outgoing traffic is counted > towards the billing. "AccountingRule out" is handy in cases where only outgoing traffic is metered. https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en#AccountingRule -- https://mastodon.social/@

Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes

On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 18:53:56 +0300 pikami wrote: > Does anyone know where I should move my relay? > I can't afford to spend a lot of money, I can only do 5$ a month. There's not a lot of hosts with cheap unmetered bandwidth -- OVH and Online.net come to mind -- and the majority of them is alread

Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes

pikami: > Does anyone know where I should move my relay? > I can't afford to spend a lot of money, I can only do 5$ a month. > > IMG_NETWORK_USAGE It's comma-separated, but this list includes a number of VPS and similar services that could be checked out. Ideally, Hetzner and Digital Ocean, and

Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes

Does anyone know where I should move my relay? I can't afford to spend a lot of money, I can only do 5$ a month. IMG_NETWORK_USAGE On 2018-04-25 13:09, Ralph Seichter wrote: > Looks like DigitalOcean has just begun measuring bandwidth usage > "officially", starting yesterday: > > > https://www

Re: [tor-relays] control who can connect me

Thank you all for your answers. so if i can't control on the access to my Exit-Relay i can control on the access to my SSH which used to run this Exir-Relay. On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Matt Traudt wrote: > On 4/25/18 10:55, dave` dave wrote: > > im using VMware Ubuntu 16.04 using SSH. > >

Re: [tor-relays] control who can connect me

On 4/25/18 10:55, dave` dave wrote: > im using VMware Ubuntu 16.04 using SSH. > im running Exit-Relay and i want to control who can connect to my > Exit-Relay, is there a way to do that- though the Exit-Relay settings, > or the SSH settings? > and there will be an even better way: if i can say who

Re: [tor-relays] control who can connect me

On 25.04.18 16:55, dave` dave wrote: > im running Exit-Relay and i want to control who can connect to my > Exit-Relay, is there a way to do that- though the Exit-Relay settings, > or the SSH settings? I assume by "who can connect" you mean "who can use my Tor node as an exit"? The computer/client

[tor-relays] control who can connect me

im using VMware Ubuntu 16.04 using SSH. im running Exit-Relay and i want to control who can connect to my Exit-Relay, is there a way to do that- though the Exit-Relay settings, or the SSH settings? and there will be an even better way: if i can say who is the specific ip that can connect to me. Tha

Re: [tor-relays] Alternative hoster (Re: DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes)

On 25.04.18 16:48, Tobias Sachs wrote: > The interesting thing about Hetzer is that only outgoing traffic is > counted towards the billing. D.O. does the same. Still, $0.01 per extra GB is theft in my book. > https://twitter.com/Knight1/status/988868691868749825 Unfortunately I beat your st

Re: [tor-relays] Alternative hoster (Re: DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes)

The interesting thing about Hetzer is that only outgoing traffic is counted towards the billing. So we can set up 38 TB of Traffic just to be on the safe side here. And the price is unbeatable at this time. My current mod: https://twitter.com/Knight1/status/988868691868749825

Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes

Regarding grandfathered accounts, section 3.7 of their terms of service is worth a closer look: “Subscribers of Grandfathered Accounts must NOT: (i) run Torrents for download or Seed Servers, TOR, or services that include content of an adult or pornographic nature [...] or otherwise circumvent the

Re: [tor-relays] Alternative hoster (Re: DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes)

On 25.04.18 15:38, Nagaev Boris wrote: > > Also, 20 GB monthly traffic allowance are Nice™. > > * 20 TB Argh! Of course I once again meant TB. :-) A word of caution for Tor exits, though: Hetzner allows exit nodes, but they are very strict when it comes to potential abuse. If one does not react

Re: [tor-relays] Alternative hoster (Re: DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes)

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 25.04.18 14:50, mick wrote: > >> I think I'm immensely lucky to get the service I do. > > Indeed. I guess DigitalOcean's loss will be Hetzner's gain as far as my > business is concerned. See https://www.hetzner.com/cloud . I already use >

[tor-relays] Alternative hoster (Re: DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes)

On 25.04.18 14:50, mick wrote: > I think I'm immensely lucky to get the service I do. Indeed. I guess DigitalOcean's loss will be Hetzner's gain as far as my business is concerned. See https://www.hetzner.com/cloud . I already use CX11 and CX21 models and they are seriously good, as is Hetzner's

Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes

My droplet allows for 1TB . I suppose I'll have to find a part time job or make changes in the relay. eth0 / monthly monthrx | tx |total| avg. rate +-+-+--- May '17 2.69 TiB |

Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes

Oops, need to correct a typo of mine: > a meager 1GB for their smallest model [...] The current monthly bandwidth allowance for DigitalOcean's smallest Droplet is 1 TB, not 1 GB. -Ralph ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https:

Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes

On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:33:16 +0200 Ralph Seichter allegedly wrote: > > Good on yer... DigitalOcean bills for outbound traffic, and with a > price of $0.01/GB (sadly not GiB) every TB in excess of a Droplet's > monthly allowance--a meager 1GB for their smallest model--will cost > an extra 10 USD.

Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes

Hi On April 25, 2018 11:33:11 AM UTC, mick wrote: >On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:09:24 +0200 >Ralph Seichter allegedly wrote: > >> Looks like DigitalOcean has just begun measuring bandwidth usage >> "officially", starting yesterday: >> >> >https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/digitalocea

Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes

On 25.04.18 13:33, mick wrote: > I had an email from them saying that as one or the group > "grandfathered in" back in 2013 I could carry on regardless. Good on yer... DigitalOcean bills for outbound traffic, and with a price of $0.01/GB (sadly not GiB) every TB in excess of a Droplet's monthly a

Re: [tor-relays] Can i use the same ip for Tor bridge and Exit-Relay to work together?

hi. Thank you for your answer. i need to add this line " EnforceDistinctSubnets 0" to the "torrc" file in the SSH? and if the answer is "yes" its still not working. On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:11 PM, teor wrote: > > > On 25 Apr 2018, at 18:09, dave` dave wrote: > > Im working on project in Tor an

Re: [tor-relays] Can i use the same ip for Tor bridge and Exit-Relay to work together?

> On 25 Apr 2018, at 18:09, dave` dave wrote: > > Im working on project in Tor and im running Exit-Relay and Tor-Bridge > together(on the same ip). for that im using VMware Ubuntu 16.04 with SSH. im > using "arm" option tor run the Tor through terminal > this is my "torrc" file through SSH: >

Re: [tor-relays] DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes

On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 12:09:24 +0200 Ralph Seichter allegedly wrote: > Looks like DigitalOcean has just begun measuring bandwidth usage > "officially", starting yesterday: > > > https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/digitalocean-bandwidth-billing-faq > > "Based on our analysis of

[tor-relays] DigitalOcean bandwidth billing changes

Looks like DigitalOcean has just begun measuring bandwidth usage "officially", starting yesterday: https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/digitalocean-bandwidth-billing-faq "Based on our analysis of the historical usage patterns of our customers, less than one percent of users wi

[tor-relays] Can i use the same ip for Tor bridge and Exit-Relay to work together?

Im working on project in Tor and im running Exit-Relay and Tor-Bridge together(on the same ip). for that im using VMware Ubuntu 16.04 with SSH. im using "arm" option tor run the Tor through terminal this is my "torrc" file through SSH: SocksPort 0 ORPort 443 BridgeRelay 1 Exitpolicy reject *:* Pub