Hello.
On 23 March 2018 at 21:13, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:53:08AM -0400, smichel0 wrote:
> > Yes, thank you. Nyx is running, but the relay is down again. It was down
> in the morning. I restartet it and now it's obvisely down again since noon.
> But nyx is still OK.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:53:08AM -0400, smichel0 wrote:
> Yes, thank you. Nyx is running, but the relay is down again. It was down in
> the morning. I restartet it and now it's obvisely down again since noon. But
> nyx is still OK.
>
> Now I restartet it and enclosed the log because the log ma
On 3/23/18 12:55, victor...@riseup.net wrote:
> El 23/03/18 a las 12:34, Matt Traudt escribió:
>>
>> Does your relay do both IPv4 and IPv6? Did your IPv4/6 address change?
>>
>
> Thanks. I haven't realised there is a problem with its IPv6 address,
> even if it the prefix hasn't changed. I am disab
El 23/03/18 a las 12:34, Matt Traudt escribió:
> On 3/23/18 12:31, victor...@riseup.net wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After a power cut a couple of weeks ago, my tor relay is not longer part
> > of the consensus:
> > B33BFA9AA0005730C1C0E8F7E6F53CF3C5716BD6
> >
> > Current tor process has been running s
On 3/23/18 12:31, victor...@riseup.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a power cut a couple of weeks ago, my tor relay is not longer part
> of the consensus:
> B33BFA9AA0005730C1C0E8F7E6F53CF3C5716BD6
>
> Current tor process has been running since 2018-03-14. How much time is
> it needed to come back?
>
Hi,
After a power cut a couple of weeks ago, my tor relay is not longer part
of the consensus:
B33BFA9AA0005730C1C0E8F7E6F53CF3C5716BD6
Current tor process has been running since 2018-03-14. How much time is
it needed to come back?
Cheers,
S
___
tor-r
On 2018-03-04 23:26, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 05:51:44PM +0100, Karsten Loesing wrote:
>> FWIW, we collected all feedback from this thread, discussed this change
>> in the metrics team, and forwarded our planned change to the Tor
>> Research Safety Board. I don't know how f
On 22 Mar (23:20:54), tor wrote:
> > Suggestion: DoSCircuitCreationMinConnections=1 be established in consensus
>
>
> The man page for the above option says:
>
> "Minimum threshold of concurrent connections before a client address can be
> flagged as executing a circuit creation DoS. In other wo
Hello. It is good you got it working,
On 23 March 2018 at 05:04, smichel0 wrote:
>
> Tor has now a uptime of about 22 hrs, it ran with an up-/download-average
> of about 47 KB/sec which is really low.
> Now there is no up- or download at all.
If it is a new relay it takes at least a week for fo
At 03:20 3/23/2018 +, tor wrote:
>> Suggestion: DoSCircuitCreationMinConnections=1 be established in consensus
>
>The man page for the above option says:
>
>"Minimum threshold of concurrent connections before a client address can be
>flagged as executing a circuit creation DoS. In other words
10 matches
Mail list logo