Re: [tor-relays] Relay stuck at Bootstrapped 0%

2018-02-16 Thread teor
> On 17 Feb 2018, at 14:03, Paul wrote: > > I moved the older keys to my working delay and had to generate new one in the > faulty one. > > Here you can find my info.log file i did not have one beforehand, so i can > not compare it. > You might want to check your log options. Your last logs

Re: [tor-relays] Relay stuck at Bootstrapped 0%

2018-02-16 Thread Paul
I moved the older keys to my working delay and had to generate new one in the faulty one. Here you can find my info.log file i did not have one beforehand, so i can not compare it. However it seems like the relay is working now. https://pastebin.com/iC5Rutq8 Could it be working now because there

Re: [tor-relays] Relay Search has moved!

2018-02-16 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi, On 16/02/18 21:41, teor wrote: >> On 17 Feb 2018, at 04:21, Iain Learmonth wrote: >> What does it break if it goes away? > > Everyone who has ever linked to a relay on a mailing list message, forum > question, or in their bookmarks. > > It also breaks muscle memory. These are good reasons

Re: [tor-relays] Api for atlas.torproject.org

2018-02-16 Thread teor
On 17 Feb 2018, at 12:12, Damian Johnson wrote: >> Or any other easier way to do it in like python :) > > Here ya go. This downloads the consensus so if you're gonna be doing > more than an occasional one-off check you should use the suggestions > from teor. This script won't find exits that s

Re: [tor-relays] Relay stuck at Bootstrapped 0%

2018-02-16 Thread teor
Hi, > On 17 Feb 2018, at 12:26, Paul wrote: > > A big Part from my systemd daemon.log which maybe already shows the issue. > > https://pastebin.com/yS9ZAwH4 > This is what is happening: >> Tor never bootstraps, so systemd restarts it. >> You can confirm by checking your systemd logs. Please

Re: [tor-relays] Relay stuck at Bootstrapped 0%

2018-02-16 Thread Paul
A big Part from my systemd daemon.log which maybe already shows the issue. https://pastebin.com/yS9ZAwH4 Thanks for your fast responses btw. Am 17.02.2018 um 01:53 schrieb teor: > > On 17 Feb 2018, at 11:41, Paul > wrote: > >> … >> >> Both are no exits. >> >> The error

Re: [tor-relays] Api for atlas.torproject.org

2018-02-16 Thread Damian Johnson
> Or any other easier way to do it in like python :) Here ya go. This downloads the consensus so if you're gonna be doing more than an occasional one-off check you should use the suggestions from teor. import sys import stem.descriptor.remote def is_exit

Re: [tor-relays] Relay stuck at Bootstrapped 0%

2018-02-16 Thread teor
> On 17 Feb 2018, at 11:41, Paul wrote: > > … > > Both are no exits. > > The error relay: A29D2A78A8A954819E220CEFBEBCE95D2FCFA54D > (https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A29D2A78A8A954819E220CEFBEBCE95D2FCFA54D) > > The other one: A0B4C435650B6D86D618EFD10EDED34FD2AFF562 > (https:/

Re: [tor-relays] Relay stuck at Bootstrapped 0%

2018-02-16 Thread Paul
I am sorry for providing not enough info, Both are no exits. The error relay: A29D2A78A8A954819E220CEFBEBCE95D2FCFA54D (https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A29D2A78A8A954819E220CEFBEBCE95D2FCFA54D) The other one: A0B4C435650B6D86D618EFD10EDED34FD2AFF562 (https://metrics.torproject.org

Re: [tor-relays] Relay stuck at Bootstrapped 0%

2018-02-16 Thread teor
> On 17 Feb 2018, at 10:44, Paul wrote: > > I am running two relays on debian (one on Raspian 9 and one on Debian 9) > and one of them for over three months now. Are you running an exit? Please link to your relays on Relay Search. > Some time ago the older one started to loop at startup. >

[tor-relays] Relay stuck at Bootstrapped 0%

2018-02-16 Thread Paul
I am running two relays on debian (one on Raspian 9 and one on Debian 9) and one of them for over three months now. Some time ago the older one started to loop at startup. I reinstalled tor and it worked for some time only to loop again. The last notices entry looks like this "Feb 16 19:36:14.00

Re: [tor-relays] tonull list

2018-02-16 Thread TorGate
hm yes, thats a solution. thanks. regards Steffen TorGate torgate(at)linux-hus.dk OpenGPG 7FD5 65EF A4EF EEF3 7A13 4372 8409 49D6 01A2 0890 > Am 16.02.2018 um 23:22 schrieb teor : > > > On 17 Feb 2018, at 08:09, TorGate > wrote: > >> Hi to all, >> what is th

Re: [tor-relays] tonull list

2018-02-16 Thread teor
> On 17 Feb 2018, at 08:09, TorGate wrote: > > Hi to all, > what is the best way to intergrade the tonull list in the torrc ? Is this a good idea? Different people will give you different advice. If the list gets too big, the authorities will reject your descriptor. > ExitPolicy https://tornu

Re: [tor-relays] DoS stats from exits running 0.3.3.2-alpha

2018-02-16 Thread teor
On 17 Feb 2018, at 07:21, Matt Traudt wrote: >> On 2/16/18 12:23, nusenu wrote: >> I was wondering if these unfriendly tor clients are using tor's default >> path selection or something else. We think they are using Tor's bandwidth weights, but without entry guards. They may be using one of the

Re: [tor-relays] Relay Search has moved!

2018-02-16 Thread teor
> On 17 Feb 2018, at 04:21, Iain Learmonth wrote: > > Hi, > >> On 16/02/18 17:09, nusenu wrote: >> I guess there is nothing that I can do to convince you of keeping that >> domain online? :) > > What does it break if it goes away? Everyone who has ever linked to a relay on a mailing list mes

[tor-relays] tonull list

2018-02-16 Thread TorGate
Hi to all, what is the best way to intergrade the tonull list in the torrc ? ExitPolicy https://tornull.org/tornull-bl.txt is that working ? or via a include ? regards Steffen TorGate torgate(at)linux-hus.dk signature.asc Description: Message signed w

Re: [tor-relays] DoS stats from exits running 0.3.3.2-alpha

2018-02-16 Thread Matt Traudt
On 2/16/18 12:23, nusenu wrote: > I was wondering if these unfriendly tor clients are using tor's default > path selection or something else. > > If they do tor exit relays would have much smaller values in their DoS stats, > right? > > Would any tor exit operator (listed bellow) running 0.3.3.2

Re: [tor-relays] Relay Search has moved!

2018-02-16 Thread nusenu
> On 16/02/18 17:09, nusenu wrote: >> I guess there is nothing that I can do to convince you of keeping that >> domain online? :) > > What does it break if it goes away? I like to browse ornetstats' git history but I will manage without atlas.tpo -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter:

[tor-relays] DoS stats from exits running 0.3.3.2-alpha

2018-02-16 Thread nusenu
I was wondering if these unfriendly tor clients are using tor's default path selection or something else. If they do tor exit relays would have much smaller values in their DoS stats, right? Would any tor exit operator (listed bellow) running 0.3.3.2-alpha be willing to share (obfuscated/not ex

Re: [tor-relays] Relay Search has moved!

2018-02-16 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi, On 16/02/18 17:09, nusenu wrote: > I guess there is nothing that I can do to convince you of keeping that domain > online? :) What does it break if it goes away? We don't want to keep it around forever, but we also don't want to turn it off if there are some things that could be fixed keepi

Re: [tor-relays] Relay Search has moved!

2018-02-16 Thread nusenu
>> can we keep relying on the atlas.tpo domain and redirect or will you kill >> atlas.tpo eventually? > > Eventually it will be killed. A date for that has not yet been set, but > it's something that we'd want to do in the next few months. I guess there is nothing that I can do to convince you of

Re: [tor-relays] DoS mitigation

2018-02-16 Thread nusenu
Fabian A. Santiago> are these good mitigations? > > what else can or should be done? limiting memory use helpful? I'm > running on ubuntu 16.04 and am using ufw for my firewall currently. > are there any other suggestions given my platform? You are currently on 0.3.2.9. You will see that things

Re: [tor-relays] Relay Search has moved!

2018-02-16 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi, On 16/02/18 16:46, nusenu wrote: > and I don't know why but it loads a lot faster to the point where you get > to enter something into the search field. This may be because assets are no longer duplicated across the two domains so if you already have the assets in your cache then you can just

[tor-relays] DoS mitigation

2018-02-16 Thread Fabian A. Santiago
Hello, I've been browsing the list archives looking for mentions of DOS mitigation. last night my exit relay went offline and when i logged into it, CPU was sitting at 100% and atlas reported mine as down and another service i have checking up time also did as well. so i rebooted my server and

Re: [tor-relays] Relay Search has moved!

2018-02-16 Thread nusenu
Iain Learmonth: > Hi All, > > Relay Search has moved! It is no longer to be found at > atlas.torproject.org (although a redirect is in place). The new home is at: > > https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html and I don't know why but it loads a lot faster to the point where you get to enter som

[tor-relays] Relay Search has moved!

2018-02-16 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi All, Relay Search has moved! It is no longer to be found at atlas.torproject.org (although a redirect is in place). The new home is at: https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html If you prefer an onion service: http://rougmnvswfsmd4dq.onion/rs.html Thanks, Iain. signature.asc Description:

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay

2018-02-16 Thread nusenu
Matt Traudt: > It's 0 because you're a new relay and haven't been measured yet. The advertised bandwidth is not 0 because this is an unmeasured relay, most unmeasured relays have a non-zerro adv. bw. example: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/773E813FDDBFC985B3D436CF669B572601C00FC3 Only t

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay

2018-02-16 Thread nusenu
nusenu: >> . My family on Atlas - the little numbers in brackets are not all the >> same, I only run two relays, however on the listings it reports sometimes >> two sometimes three. Are you meant to include "yourself" in the torrc or >> only other relays?? > > recently I reported a bug in that p

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay

2018-02-16 Thread nusenu
> . My family on Atlas - the little numbers in brackets are not all the > same, I only run two relays, however on the listings it reports sometimes > two sometimes three. Are you meant to include "yourself" in the torrc or > only other relays?? recently I reported a bug in that part of atlas which

Re: [tor-relays] Api for atlas.torproject.org

2018-02-16 Thread Tyler Johnson
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 7:26 PM, flipchan wrote: > Hey, > Im trying to write an ip checker script for a mail server/firewall and i > want to be able check if the ip is a tor relay, is their a api for looking > up ips on atlas.torproject.org ? > I found querying https://onionite.now.sh and grep

Re: [tor-relays] New Relay

2018-02-16 Thread Matt Traudt
On 2/16/18 08:11, Gary wrote: > Hello. > > I recently set up a new relay, jaffacakemonster2, I would be grateful if > someone could answer some questions for me. > > 1. The bandwidth on Atlas is listed as "0". Is this a wait a few > days/new relay issue or a configuration issue. I was surprised t

[tor-relays] New Relay

2018-02-16 Thread Gary
Hello. I recently set up a new relay, jaffacakemonster2, I would be grateful if someone could answer some questions for me. 1. The bandwidth on Atlas is listed as "0". Is this a wait a few days/new relay issue or a configuration issue. I was surprised to find exit relays are default now, I hope I

Re: [tor-relays] Api for atlas.torproject.org

2018-02-16 Thread teor
> On 16 Feb 2018, at 17:49, Felix wrote: > > Hey > >> Am 16-Feb-18 um 02:26 schrieb flipchan: >> Hey, >> Im trying to write an ip checker script for a mail server/firewall and i >> want to be able check if the ip is a tor relay, is their a api for >> looking up ips on atlas.torproject.org ? >>