Re: [tor-relays] Faravahar - Scheduled Maintenance - Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 18:00:00 UTC to 22:00 UTC

2018-01-11 Thread Sina Rabbani
This work is completed. Faravahar should be happier. All the best, Sina "Be the change that you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi - On Jan 11, 2018, at 1:06 PM, sina s...@redteam.net wrote: > FYI, This work will begin shortly. > > > All the best, > Sina > > "Be the change that

Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?

2018-01-11 Thread teor
> On 12 Jan 2018, at 08:46, Toralf Förster wrote: > >> On 01/11/2018 02:10 AM, teor wrote: >> As far as I can tell, this single rule has the same effect: > Even if " -P INPUT DROP" is et ? I think that applying the single rule to the default config, has the same effect as applying all the rul

Re: [tor-relays] request for comments: The Tor Relay Guide (Draft)

2018-01-11 Thread Vinícius Zavam
On Jan 11, 2018 20:36, "nusenu" wrote: The #Tor relay documentation on www.torproject.org has shown its age and some of us have been working on writing something new, currently it lives on trac but will live on a website eventually. The Tor Relay Guide https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wi

Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?

2018-01-11 Thread Toralf Förster
On 01/11/2018 02:10 AM, teor wrote: > As far as I can tell, this single rule has the same effect: Even if " -P INPUT DROP" is et ? -- Toralf PGP C4EACDDE 0076E94E signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-

Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily and ContactInfo fields are required for operators running multiple tor instances

2018-01-11 Thread Dmitrii Tcvetkov
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 21:02:42 +0100 Sebastian Hahn wrote: > > On 11. Jan 2018, at 20:44, Dmitrii Tcvetkov > > wrote: > >>>MyFamily **must** be set correctly if you run more than one > >>> relay or bridge. (That is, every relay should list all the others > >>> as described above.) > > > >

Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily and ContactInfo fields are required for operators running multiple tor instances

2018-01-11 Thread Sebastian Hahn
> On 11. Jan 2018, at 20:44, Dmitrii Tcvetkov wrote: > >>>MyFamily **must** be set correctly if you run more than one >>> relay or bridge. (That is, every relay should list all the others >>> as described above.) > > So if I run some relays and also some bridges I must to specify > unhashed

Re: [tor-relays] MyFamily and ContactInfo fields are required for operators running multiple tor instances

2018-01-11 Thread Dmitrii Tcvetkov
> > MyFamily **must** be set correctly if you run more than one > > relay or bridge. (That is, every relay should list all the others > > as described above.) So if I run some relays and also some bridges I must to specify unhashed fingerprints of the bridges in MyFamily in configs of all my

[tor-relays] request for comments: The Tor Relay Guide (Draft)

2018-01-11 Thread nusenu
The #Tor relay documentation on www.torproject.org has shown its age and some of us have been working on writing something new, currently it lives on trac but will live on a website eventually. The Tor Relay Guide https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/TorRelayGuide It also features inst

[tor-relays] MyFamily and ContactInfo fields are required for operators running multiple tor instances

2018-01-11 Thread nusenu
Hi, I'd like to highlight that today the following two sentences requiring ContactInfo and MyFamily for operators running multiple relays got added to the tor manual page [1]: > ContactInfo **must** be set to a working address if you run more than one > relay or bridge. (Really, everyb

[tor-relays] Fwd: Faravahar - Scheduled Maintenance - Thursday, January 11, 2018 at 18:00:00 UTC to 22:00 UTC

2018-01-11 Thread Sina Rabbani
FYI, This work will begin shortly. All the best, Sina "Be the change that you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi - On Jan 9, 2018, at 6:28 PM, sina s...@redteam.net wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > > Scheduled Maintenance Thursday, January 11, 2

Re: [tor-relays] connlimit: better to use "DROP" or "REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset"?

2018-01-11 Thread Toralf Förster
On 01/11/2018 02:10 AM, teor wrote: > We allow 2 relays per IPv4 address, and each relay makes 1-2 connections > to each other relay. (Or more, if the connections start failing. This is > a bug we want to fix.) > > So if you're going to do this, please set a much higher limit than 2. > I would sug