Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

2017-09-26 Thread teor
> On 27 Sep 2017, at 10:35, John Ricketts wrote: > > I will be in Seattle mid-October, hoping I can connect with folks in Seattle > area that do Tor and also visit the office to get some shirts and say hi! > > Any takers, Seattle Tor people? If you don't get many takers, it's because some of

Re: [tor-relays] MaxMemInQueues defends against 375000 circuits in 9 secs

2017-09-26 Thread teor
> On 27 Sep 2017, at 04:46, Felix wrote: > > Signed PGP part > Hi everybody > > Another circuit storm, right ? > > > > MaxMemInQueues 2 GB > > > > 2017-09-26_17-55-00: > PID JID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME CPU COMMAND > 84847 2 256 6 20 0 484M 427M uwait 0 907:02 1

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

2017-09-26 Thread tor
> Doesn't a lot of it depend on context anyway? Yes. > How can we quantify something like this? We can't. We don't have all the data. We have to assume the worst and plan accordingly.___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

2017-09-26 Thread Duncan
dawuud: > >> I think it is worth remembering that there isn't evidence there is a >> global passive adversary at the moment, even if certain agencies and >> organizations clearly aspire to be one. > > Quite so. It is well established that these so called agencies do not > aspire to be passive. Or

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

2017-09-26 Thread John Ricketts
Roger, Thank you. Thats the concise answer I was looking for and I will hold at 5% and coordinate from there. I will be in Seattle mid-October, hoping I can connect with folks in Seattle area that do Tor and also visit the office to get some shirts and say hi! Any takers, Seattle Tor people?

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

2017-09-26 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 01:04:28PM +, John Ricketts wrote: > I am about to fire up more Exit Relays and if I do so I will jump from my > roughly 3% of Exit Probability to what technically could easily reach 6-8%. > > I would like to know everyone???s opinion on having an individual operator

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

2017-09-26 Thread grarpamp
>> :> what the current value of "global" is but I should hope it's well above >> 5%... >> :I'm curious about what you mean by "global" here, and how it relates to >> :[potentially] malicious operators (suspicious relays of which are >> :frequently thrown off the Tor network). >> >> "global" as in

Re: [tor-relays] On some differences after upgrade to latest tor for Jessie

2017-09-26 Thread Torix
I am running jesse, too. Yes, it runs systemd; I find (at least some) tor info in: /var/log/daemon.log Having no experience with tor on an earlier debian, I don't know if that's all there is. HTH, --torix Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. > Original Message

[tor-relays] MaxMemInQueues defends against 375000 circuits in 9 secs

2017-09-26 Thread Felix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everybody Another circuit storm, right ? - MaxMemInQueues 2 GB - 2017-09-26_17-55-00: PID JID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME CPU COMMAND 84847 2 256 6 20 0 484M 427M uwait 0 907:02 11.77% tor 2017-09-26_18-59-00: PI

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

2017-09-26 Thread Scott Bennett
dawuud wrote: > > > I think it is worth remembering that there isn't evidence there is a > > global passive adversary at the moment, even if certain agencies and > > organizations clearly aspire to be one. > > Quite so. It is well established that these so called agencies do not > aspire to be pa