Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

2017-09-25 Thread dawuud
> I think it is worth remembering that there isn't evidence there is a > global passive adversary at the moment, even if certain agencies and > organizations clearly aspire to be one. Quite so. It is well established that these so called agencies do not aspire to be passive. Or perhaps you simply

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

2017-09-25 Thread Duncan
Hi Jonathan, Jonathan D. Proulx: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 02:36:00PM +, Duncan wrote: > :Hi Jonathan, > : > :Jonathan Proulx: > :> > :> To the initial question for a honest operator who's open about their > :> ownership and enters proper family membership data I can't see how > :> more exit

Re: [tor-relays] >18k 'Machiavelli' bridges added since 2017-09-02 (>4k currently running = 64% of bridges)

2017-09-25 Thread nusenu
would you be willing to disclose from how many distinct ASes these Machiavelli named bridges came from so far? -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter: @nusenu_ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-

Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

2017-09-25 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 02:36:00PM +, Duncan wrote: :Hi Jonathan, : :Jonathan Proulx: :> :> To the initial question for a honest operator who's open about their :> ownership and enters proper family membership data I can't see how :> more exit volume is a problem. TOR needs to be resilient ag

Re: [tor-relays] Accounting logic

2017-09-25 Thread r1610091651
Thanks nusenu for the pointer. Looks like it's a real "undocumented feature" ;-), and matches the behaviour I'm seeing. On a related note, is there a way to search the archives on specific keywords? Thanks Seb On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 at 23:44 nusenu wrote: > Teor (tor developer) explained it in t