Hi,
On 17/09/17 00:56, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Actually, no, we want it to be the case that all relays can reach all
> relays. The less true that becomes -- that is, the less clique-like
> the network topology becomes -- the more complicated the anonymity
> measurements become, and that is poten
Thanks for the info, I will ask my ISP.
Graeme
On 17 September 2017 at 11:23, Sebastian Hahn
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> > On 17. Sep 2017, at 01:19, Graeme Neilson wrote:
> >
> > I am running a relay but 4 out of 8 directory authorities appear to
> being blocked by my ISP.
> > There is no route to
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 11:44:41PM +, dawuud wrote:
> > Your only option would be to ask your ISP to uncensor the internet,
> > unfortunately. Tor requires that all relays are able to contact all
> > other relays, and those which cannot participate in the network.
>
> I think you meant to say:
> Your only option would be to ask your ISP to uncensor the internet,
> unfortunately. Tor requires that all relays are able to contact all
> other relays, and those which cannot participate in the network.
I think you meant to say:
"Tor requires that all relays are able to contact all directory
Hi there,
> On 17. Sep 2017, at 01:19, Graeme Neilson wrote:
>
> I am running a relay but 4 out of 8 directory authorities appear to being
> blocked by my ISP.
> There is no route to the blocked authorities and the last responding tcp
> traceroute hop is an ISP machine. There are routes via I
Hi,
I am running a relay but 4 out of 8 directory authorities appear to being
blocked by my ISP.
There is no route to the blocked authorities and the last responding tcp
traceroute hop is an ISP machine. There are routes via IPv6 though.
Is there anything I can do to get my relay in the consensus
