Re: [tor-relays] [warn] assign_to_cpuworker failed. Ignoring.

> On 1 Aug 2017, at 08:17, Ybslik wrote: > ... > > Me - 9D60A484CFBDB5B890FB5B18941494734584BA17 > > ... > Jul 31 20:37:34.000 [notice] Since startup, we have initiated 0 v1 > connections, 0 v2 connections, 3 v3 connections, and 908239 v4 connections; > and receive

Re: [tor-relays] Best configuration for high speed exit relay with limited bandwith (1Tb)

> On 1 Aug 2017, at 07:53, King Queen wrote: > > hi, > > I have a relatively new VPS on CockBox running a Tor exit node. It's > the $10/month one https://box.cock.li/ which means it has very fast > network (Gigabit I think) but I can only use 1TB per month. > > I've done some reading round of

[tor-relays] Best configuration for high speed exit relay with limited bandwith (1Tb)

hi, I have a relatively new VPS on CockBox running a Tor exit node. It's the $10/month one https://box.cock.li/ which means it has very fast network (Gigabit I think) but I can only use 1TB per month. I've done some reading round of previous posts on here over the year, and as a result I have var

Re: [tor-relays] network traffic gap of >=20% between inbount and outbound traffic vanished after 20th of July

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/31/2017 02:30 AM, teor wrote: > Which relay fingerprint(s)? 1AF72E8906E6C49481A791A6F8F84F8DFEBBB2BA > Did you upgrade your Tor version? at 30th of June to 0.3.1.4-alpha > Is your relay a directory mirror or HSDir? HSdir only for a short time