Re: [tor-relays] Who is running the two biggest Exits in the network?

On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Duncan wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Paul: >> >> >> I agree with that part. >> >> But sometimes it helps to look and think things from an extreme point of >> view: >> Let's assume the whole TOR would be anonymous in a way that you cant >> see contacts not even nicknames. W

Re: [tor-relays] Who is running the two biggest Exits in the network?

Hi Paul, Paul: I agree with that part. But sometimes it helps to look and think things from an extreme point of view: Let's assume the whole TOR would be anonymous in a way that you cant see contacts not even nicknames. Where in this scenario should TRUST derive from? Would you or anybody re

Re: [tor-relays] New exit node best practices

Hi Isaac, Am 27.05.2017 um 02:45 schrieb Isaac Grover, Aileron I.T.: > Good evening, > > After many months of running a relay, I'm planning to establish up a family > of exit nodes with geographically diverse VPS providers, shying away from the > list of the most heavily used Tor friendly prov

Re: [tor-relays] Who is running the two biggest Exits in the network?

Am 27.05.2017 um 00:48 schrieb Duncan: > Hi Paul, > > Paul: >> Since about mid April there are just two similar Exits making up now >> about 4.5% exit probability together. >> Located in Panama, run in the okservers.net network, AS395978 ,they >> don’t give up any further information about thems