@Ivan
>Some best practices definitely would be awesome to have about running on
>common (embedded) hardware. Clear notification like "your Commodore 64 is to
>slow to be a good relay" would also be useful.
I agree about the need for guidelines but I disagree about the content of the
guidelin
Hi There I am actually a little bit confused now. I am one of (as Rana knows)
those Pi 3 based OR operators with daily changing IP address. My consensus
weight is about 5,000, with a max. of 1,400 connections. I would like to
recomment, that the TOR org should publish minimum requirements
I have finally got a bloody tshirt.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Rana:
> Those opinions were backed by technical arguments, here are a few:
>
> - the numerous small relays that change their IP addresses burden
> the network unnecessarily with frequent re-publishing of their
> descriptors - small relays that carry a small number of circuits
> actually DESTROY
@Ivan
>If you think that your relay is underrated or has poor performance try to
>adjust your hardware/settings. Anyway almost every relay operator has this
>kind of "operator anxiety". Don't worry. ;)
It is not about anxiety. The last thing that would cause anxiety for me is the
possibility
Am 20.12.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Volker Mink:
> Is it OK with their TOS to run a TOR Relay7Exit?
> If so, i really consider getting a VPS there!
Volker - apart from not putting all eggs in the same basket (France as country
and Online.net as ISP), but if you really wanna go there scaleway opened
Rana:
> So - what's the metric for calling a middle relay "useful"? Is it the total
> number of bytes that it relays daily?
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/707A9A3358E0D8653089AF32A097570A96400C
> C6 is sending about 0.85 GB every 24 hours. Is it a "useful" relay?
Sure it is! If there wer
So - what's the metric for calling a middle relay "useful"? Is it the total
number of bytes that it relays daily?
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/707A9A3358E0D8653089AF32A097570A96400C
C6 is sending about 0.85 GB every 24 hours. Is it a "useful" relay?
___
Apologies for digging up this thread, but I just wanted to report that I
got my tshirt in the mail today along with some other tor swag just in time
for Christmas.
Thanks Jon and Teor!
Merry Christmas!
-
Dakota
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 6:36 PM, I wrote:
> All,
>
> >
> We learnt a lot from doing
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Rana wrote:
> If the small relays are largely unused (eg if 10% of the relays carry 90% of
> the Tor traffic - does anyone have an exact statistics on this?) and if, in
> addition, there is no increased anonymity benefit in having a lot of small
> relays, then
Thank you @Gamby for echoing my sentiment.
While there can be a good tech reason for considering small relays useless, the
small relay operators MUST be properly and openly advised about how useful or
useless their relays are. I even have read about someone's suggestion of
gamification of such
I have followed this for some time with interest, because I've run 2
relays from "home" connections for over 2 years - at on point three, all
on unused older laptops. I have an Archer C7 which can handle 31k
connections (theoretically) and have never had issues. My IP address
changes maybe 3 ti
thanks for fixing it!
+--+-+
| nickname | eMyFamileyCount |
+--+-+
| alsaceonion | 30. |
| alsaceonionb | 30. |
| bsdonion | 30. |
| budapestonion| 30. |
| b
@grarpamp
>Please see and contribute to the following...
>https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/HardwarePerformanceCompendium
The Pi info there is indeed totally out of date. I opened an account on the
wiki. However, after 10 (!) tries to pass the totally unnecessary captcha
which
14 matches
Mail list logo
