On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Rana wrote:
> If there is such a wiki I will be happy to submit my reports, I am not aware
> of one.
Please see and contribute to the following...
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/HardwarePerformanceCompendium
> Also, based on this thread the pe
Patrice:
> From that I thought Tor used already OpenSSL but it wasn't installed. :S
You had OpenSSL library installed as a shared object libcrypto.so to
which tor is dynamically linked. Though you didn't have /usr/bin/openssl
aka "OpenSSL command line tool". This is pretty common setup.
> I bough
Hi Josef,
thanks for adding your 3 relays to the tor network!
Please do not forget to set the MyFamily parameter in your torrc files
so tor clients are not using your non-exit and exit relays at the same
time in a single circuit.
If you need help with configuring MyFamily, let us know.
Since y
pa011:
> How can I best find out which ones bring me on your second one?
- search for your all your relays on atlas.torproject.org.
- open every of your relays in a new tab
- look for orange colored family members
(they represent misconfigured/asymmetric configurations)
if there are none, mak
> thanks for your great work - lets assume for a second I would be with
> several relays on both of you lists:
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ornetstats/stats/master/o/main_exit_operators.txt
>
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ornetstats/stats/master/o/potentially_dangerous_relaygrou
Np - it was an issue with my update script ;-)
Cheers
Mark B
Snaptor.co.uk (non commercial)
> On 22 Dec 2016, at 23:03, nusenu wrote:
>
> thanks for fixing it!
>
> +---+---+
> | nickname | MyFamilyCount |
> +---+---+
> | SnapExitBULG |
Thank you! That was already the answer. :)
You will not see anything in logs until this value isn't good and was
adjusted by tor. For details, see compute_real_max_mem_in_queues()
function in /src/or/config.c.
Cheers,
Patrice
___
tor-relays mailing l
Please don't mix multiple questions into one thread.
Sorry, my bad.
Tor does not implement crypto itself (mostly) and relies on a
cryptolibrary (which is OpenSSL/LibreSSL/etc) instead. Thus you should
check if AES-NI is enabled in your cryptolibrary.
An excerpt from StackOverflow answer [1]
thanks for fixing it!
+---+---+
| nickname | MyFamilyCount |
+---+---+
| SnapExitBULG | 10. |
| SnapExitMOLD | 10. |
| SnapExitUS| 10. |
| SnapTorBANG | 10. |
| SnapTorCAN| 10. |
| Sn
Hi nusenu,
thanks for your great work - lets assume for a second I would be with several
relays on both of you lists:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ornetstats/stats/master/o/main_exit_operators.txt
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ornetstats/stats/master/o/potentially_dangerous_relaygroups
If there is such a wiki I will be happy to submit my reports, I am not aware of
one. Also, based on this thread the people who may take action and decisions
seem to be convinced that home relays are of no or very little use to Tor. For
this reason, whether they are right or not, I am not sure we
Patrice:
> And my other question is, does tor recognize this option?
>> MaxMemInQueues 7000 MByte
It does, see the man page or the source code.
> Because I see nothing in the logs.
> I am not 100% sure but I think tor gave a feedback when I used this
> option in the earlier versions.
You will no
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Rana wrote:
> A 20 mbps Pi relay has been reported here, still under-utilized.
All these reports of this or that made in piles of random email ...
serves no one past the typical few day participant convos.
So please people... submit all your hardware speed report
Please don't mix multiple questions into one thread.
Patrice:
> does anyone know if the aes-ni support of the motherboard is used by
> default? (I saw nothing in the logs.)
Tor does not implement crypto itself (mostly) and relies on a
cryptolibrary (which is OpenSSL/LibreSSL/etc) instead. Thus y
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf
Of David Serrano
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 7:36 PM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Unwarranted discrimination of relays with dynamic
IP
On 2016-12-22 19:24
On 2016-12-22 19:24:25 (+0200), Rana wrote:
>
> 2. "Residential lines in particular ... hardware caves when too many
> connections are open in parallel" - this appears to be plain incorrect. [...]
> ith 1300 simultaneous connections.
His statement is right. 1300 connections are not a lot. I used
@Sebastian,
Thank you for the detailed presentation of your arguments against the use of
residential relays. While many (probably most) of the points you made are
convincing and, coming from a DirAuth operator, difficult for me to contest,
I would like to refer to those of them that seem to be le
Hi there,
I am one of the directory authority operators, so while I don't
claim to know what the collective community wants, I am one of
the people who are asked to make these decisions.
> On 22 Dec 2016, at 10:25, Rana wrote:
>
> So my question to the community is as follows: does the Tor comm
pussy
2016年12月22日 17:59,"Rana" 写道:
> @Andreas
> ...
> >> I realize there could be pros and contras. Among the contras there
> could be (for example) many small relays overloading the dirauths. I would
> like to hear more about the contras.
> >A Pi running at its line speed isn't exactly a small r
@Andreas
...
>> I realize there could be pros and contras. Among the contras there could be
>> (for example) many small relays overloading the dirauths. I would like to
>> hear more about the contras.
>A Pi running at its line speed isn't exactly a small relay.
Of course it isn't. A 20 mbps Pi
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:25:11 +, Rana wrote:
...
> I realize there could be pros and contras. Among the contras there could be
> (for example) many small relays overloading the dirauths. I would like to
> hear more about the contras.
A Pi running at its line speed isn't exactly a small relay.
So my question to the community is as follows: does the Tor community want
these small, cheap relays scattered in large quantity around the world, or not?
I realize there could be pros and contras. Among the contras there could be
(for example) many small relays overloading the dirauths. I would
@Patrice:
Yes both relays started with brand new identities and the one that is now
clinically dead (nickname ZG0) has been wiped out and restarted with a new
fingerprint AND a new IP address as I have a dynamic one and I rebooted my
router to get a new one).
Did not help, so obviously this h
23 matches
Mail list logo