On 10/26/16 8:22 PM, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
> An Idaho nonprofit has expressed guarded interest in Tor. Ideally I'd
> like them to run an exit node without fuss or bother, but the Tor
> Project's Tips on Running an Exit Node only covers limited liability
> corporations (LLCs) regarding the legal/
An Idaho nonprofit has expressed guarded interest in Tor. Ideally I'd
like them to run an exit node without fuss or bother, but the Tor
Project's Tips on Running an Exit Node only covers limited liability
corporations (LLCs) regarding the legal/corporate set-up. Is there
anything to add, or is that
> On 27 Oct. 2016, at 00:32, D. S. Ljungmark wrote:
>
> On tis, 2016-10-25 at 22:52 +1100, teor wrote:
>>>
>>> On 25 Oct. 2016, at 22:26, D.S. Ljungmark
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> So, Now I've taken some steps to adjust the state of the relay, and
>>> try to balance this.
>>>
>>> To reiterate a poin
Your "draft" looks very good. I'm sure, that it will help.
Thanks a lot
On 26.10.2016 02:01, Mirimir wrote:
> On 10/25/2016 05:40 PM, teor wrote:
>>
>>> On 26 Oct. 2016, at 10:31, Mirimir wrote:
>>>
Any particular reason to let the mailing list know you have useful
information but not
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, at 02:04 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> If you're using Debian jessie, you can get an 0.2.8.9 package from
> either backports or the torproject.org repository. I went with
> backports because that let me also pick up a much newer openssl.
>
> zw
Zack,
Interesting, I too recentl
Thanks for the advice, I added torproject.org repo and it upgraded to 0.2.8.9
Alan
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Peter Palfrader
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Alan wrote:
>>> 0.2.5.12 is the latest version from the repo. Im assuming I should pull
>>> down the source and compile it.
>>
>>
On ons, 2016-10-26 at 15:32 +0200, D. S. Ljungmark wrote:
> On tis, 2016-10-25 at 22:52 +1100, teor wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 25 Oct. 2016, at 22:26, D.S. Ljungmark
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > So, Now I've taken some steps to adjust the state of the relay,
> > > and
> > > try to balance thi
On tis, 2016-10-25 at 22:52 +1100, teor wrote:
> >
> > On 25 Oct. 2016, at 22:26, D.S. Ljungmark
> > wrote:
> >
> > So, Now I've taken some steps to adjust the state of the relay, and
> > try to balance this.
> >
> > To reiterate a point previously, before I start adding more tor
> > daemons o
On tis, 2016-10-25 at 13:34 +0200, Volker Mink wrote:
> Apart from your topic - what kind of internet connection do you use?
> :D
Gigabit dedicated fiber.
//D.S.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
tor-relays mailing
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 5:54 AM, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Alan wrote:
>> 0.2.5.12 is the latest version from the repo. Im assuming I should pull
>> down the source and compile it.
>
> Depends on the repo. If you provided a little more information we'd be
> able to sy more.
I
Hi,
You can check if there is no physical problem on your line, just in case
! Connect to your modem integrated web ui and check ATM statistics of
your DSL line.
Of course the first step is to watch the "DSL" signal light when you are
disconnected. If it's a loss of DSL signal then it's a phys
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Alan wrote:
> 0.2.5.12 is the latest version from the repo. Im assuming I should pull
> down the source and compile it.
Depends on the repo. If you provided a little more information we'd be
able to sy more.
--
| .''`. ** Debian **
P
0.2.5.12 is the latest version from the repo. Im assuming I should pull
down the source and compile it.
>> Thanks for the update, my main relay was vulnerable but i've patched it
now to 0.2.8.9.
>>
>> My Raspberry Pi is running 0.2.5.12 -- is that ok?
>
> If your version is from before 2016-10-17,
On 2016-10-26 08:44:00 (+), Lluís wrote:
>
> I'm very sad Jazztel is the one that turns out to be
> **really** unstable for me.
You mentioned "VDSL" in the OP, however I'm talking about fiber. Maybe by
switching technologies you could get an improved service.
--
David Serrano
PGP: 1BCC1A
David Serrano:
> On 2016-10-26 08:11:00 (+), Lluís wrote:
>>
>> I am just desperate with my ISP, he is just leaving the
>> VDSL2 connection down several times a day, taking the relay with it.
>>
>> Does anyone know a much more stable, tor-friendly, ISP for an
>> Spanish user ?
>
> I used to h
> Thanks for the update, my main relay was vulnerable but i've patched it
> now to 0.2.8.9.
>
> My Raspberry Pi is running 0.2.5.12 -- is that ok?
If your version is from before 2016-10-17, your relay is vulnerable.
To be sure you should be running 0.2.8.9.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPG
On 2016-10-26 08:11:00 (+), Lluís wrote:
>
> I am just desperate with my ISP, he is just leaving the
> VDSL2 connection down several times a day, taking the relay with it.
>
> Does anyone know a much more stable, tor-friendly, ISP for an
> Spanish user ?
I used to have two relays on Jazztel'
niftyeuropeanbunny -> bridges, a lot of them
Markus
Sent from my iPad
On 26 Oct 2016, at 10:22, nusenu wrote:
>> 32 relays updated (Debian + Tor compiled to latest version)
>>
>> I am getting too old for this without a server management system
>
> not all relays with your contactinfo s
> 32 relays updated (Debian + Tor compiled to latest version)
>
> I am getting too old for this without a server management system
not all relays with your contactinfo seem to be updated properly
doing it manually is slow and error prone.
Maybe consider using the 'unattended-upgrades' packag
Hello,
I am a relay operator in Spain (or at least I try to).
I am just desperate with my ISP, he is just leaving the
VDSL2 connection down several times a day, taking the relay with it.
Does anyone know a much more stable, tor-friendly, ISP for an
Spanish user ?
The following record of assigne
nusenu:
> CentOS/RHEL/Fedora
> ===
>
> yum install --enablerepo=epel-testing tor
correction:
CentOS/RHEL
yum upgrade --enablerepo=epel-testing tor
fedora:
dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing tor
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
Markus, I'm too damn old to type that accurately, My hands shake from old
mechanical keyboards and my eyes are irradiated from old Wyse 50 terminals...
> On Oct 26, 2016, at 02:31, Markus Koch wrote:
>
> I did it like a real man, just me hands and putty without any bash scripts
> and these mod
Haha ok!
Nice hard work so ;)
Good luck for next update ! (hope it will be ok for a long time!)
Le 26/10/2016 à 09:30, Markus Koch a écrit :
> I did it like a real man, just me hands and putty without any bash scripts
> and these modern devil tools!
>
> markus
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On 26
I did it like a real man, just me hands and putty without any bash scripts and
these modern devil tools!
markus
Sent from my iPad
> On 26 Oct 2016, at 09:18, John Ricketts wrote:
>
> I feel you Markus, I did 24. I wrote a bash script to update/upgrade/reboot.
>
>> On Oct 26, 2016, at 02:1
I feel you Markus, I did 24. I wrote a bash script to update/upgrade/reboot.
> On Oct 26, 2016, at 02:17, Markus Koch wrote:
>
> 32 relays updated (Debian + Tor compiled to latest version)
>
> I am getting too old for this without a server management system
>
> Markus
>
>
>
>
> 2016
Handmade scripts to update everybody ?
(a little curious ;)
Markus Koch :
> I am getting too old for this without a server management system
--
Petrusko
EBE23AE5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
32 relays updated (Debian + Tor compiled to latest version)
I am getting too old for this without a server management system
Markus
2016-10-25 23:48 GMT+02:00 nusenu :
> just a reminder since most of the tor network (including some of the
> biggest operators) still runs vulnerable relays
33C3 Tickets: Status and Open Sale
The ticket contingents of the first phase of our presale are by now
exhausted. Only some vouchers (such as the ones sent to angels) can be
redeemed from now on.
The second phase – the open presale without vouchers – will start in a
staggered manner on three days
28 matches
Mail list logo
