On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:41:41 +0200
Markus Koch wrote:
> You are welcome :)
>
> JUST A NOTE: TRAFFIC IS F R E E and UNLIMITED. You don't have to worry
> about the $20/TB at all. ATM! This can chance anytime but atm the
> traffic is FREE! Use is, there are lots of high traffic tor nodes out
> ther
> On 16 Sep 2016, at 07:58, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
> I have made some measurements. Downloading large files through Tor did
> not appear to show significant differences between both nodes, which
> could mean that Tor clients are either capped in general or the circuits
> were overall not fast e
I have made some measurements. Downloading large files through Tor did
not appear to show significant differences between both nodes, which
could mean that Tor clients are either capped in general or the circuits
were overall not fast enough to make my nodes reach their limits.
I also tried severa
No idea. This is the first promo code I've used.
On Sep 15, 2016 3:54 PM, "Jason Jung" wrote:
> Maybe we are limited to only one promo code of that nature? I used
> DIVEIN10 about two years ago and using LOWENDBOX says "Sorry, this promo
> cannot be applied to your account. Most promos are vali
Maybe we are limited to only one promo code of that nature? I used
DIVEIN10 about two years ago and using LOWENDBOX says "Sorry, this promo
cannot be applied to your account. Most promos are valid for new
customers only."
Tristan:
> It's in the billing settings after you log in.
>
> On Sep 15, 2
You are welcome :)
JUST A NOTE: TRAFFIC IS F R E E and UNLIMITED. You don't have to worry
about the $20/TB at all. ATM! This can chance anytime but atm the
traffic is FREE! Use is, there are lots of high traffic tor nodes out
there. Join them ;)
Markus
2016-09-15 22:38 GMT+02:00 Ralph Seichter
On 15.09.16 22:32, Tristan wrote:
> It's in the billing settings after you log in.
This is great. I have just entered the promo code in the billing section
of my account, and voilà, $15 have been added. Thank you, Tristan, for
pointing me to the right place, and thanks to Markus for mentioning th
Yes, just create a new account, they don't check any data, you just need a new
(free) e-mail and enter the promo code at signup. Worked great here and we now
have a new India droplet :)
Btw, asian country relays worked out bad with tor. Around 1-2 Mbyte traffic :(
no clue why.
Markus
Sent fr
It's in the billing settings after you log in.
On Sep 15, 2016 3:28 PM, "Ralph Seichter" wrote:
> On 15.09.16 21:43, Markus Koch wrote:
>
> > DigitalOcean has a new Promo: $15 free aka 3 months free droplet.
>
> I have tried creating an additional Droplet, but it seems that promo codes
> cannot
That code only works with new registrations.
On September 15, 2016 3:28:19 PM CDT, Ralph Seichter
wrote:
>On 15.09.16 21:43, Markus Koch wrote:
>
>> DigitalOcean has a new Promo: $15 free aka 3 months free droplet.
>
>I have tried creating an additional Droplet, but it seems that promo
>codes
>
On 15.09.16 21:43, Markus Koch wrote:
> DigitalOcean has a new Promo: $15 free aka 3 months free droplet.
I have tried creating an additional Droplet, but it seems that promo codes
cannot be entered anywhere in this process. Probably only when registering
a new customer account, I suppose?
-Ralp
Thanks! Going on 2 months with an exit node. I had to disable SSH after
about a month, but that's the only complaint I've gotten.
On Sep 15, 2016 2:43 PM, "Markus Koch" wrote:
Just 2 let you know, DigitalOcean has a new Promo: $15 free aka 3
months free droplet.
Guard/Middle is no problem at al
Just 2 let you know, DigitalOcean has a new Promo: $15 free aka 3
months free droplet.
Guard/Middle is no problem at all. My exits have been kicked after
around 4 months (too many abuse mails :( )
Promocode: LOWENDBOX
https://lowendbox.com/blog/september-hosting-vps-coupon-round-up/
I do not ge
On 15.09.16 21:21, Green Dream wrote:
> The Advertised Bandwidth is is significantly lower on TorRelay02HORUS
> too.
Indeed, even though bandwitdh settings are identical on both nodes:
BandwidthRate 96 MBytes
BandwidthBurst 112 MBytes
Arm shows me that node #1 has upload/download of around
The Advertised Bandwidth is is significantly lower on TorRelay02HORUS
too. Let me quote teor from another recent thread, I think the same
info is helpful here:
-- begin quote --
Your relay reports a bandwidth based on the amount of traffic it has
sustained in any 10 second period over the past da
On 15.09.16 20:57, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> You should post both fingerprint or even just Atlas links directly,
> maybe someone will have more ideas on why this could happen.
1)
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/0C3D5E19E3C75B505C8ACD26F89DCA2DF970553E
2)
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 20:34:54 +0200
Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 15.09.16 19:43, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>
> > It is normal to run multiple nodes in one family and have most or all
> > of them get the Guard flag.
>
> I don't see this happen. I would think that weeks of uninterrupted
> uptime should m
On 15.09.16 19:43, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> It is normal to run multiple nodes in one family and have most or all
> of them get the Guard flag.
I don't see this happen. I would think that weeks of uninterrupted
uptime should mean both nodes qualify, but only one has a guard flag.
The nodes are on s
I think he meant that it will not get the flag the same time. I set up
some relays and the "lifetime of a relay" is a nice indicator but
relays behave different. One relay needed 14 days to be stable and I
am 100% sure that the server and network was online 24/7. Just wait
and see :)
Markus
2016
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 19:39:07 +0200
Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 15.09.2016 18:40, Markus Koch wrote:
>
> > 100% normal. Welcome to tor.
> > No, no clue why ;)
>
> I was contemplating possible security considerations behind this. One
> particular person or organization responsible for the adminis
On 15.09.2016 18:40, Markus Koch wrote:
> 100% normal. Welcome to tor.
> No, no clue why ;)
I was contemplating possible security considerations behind this. One
particular person or organization responsible for the administration of
multiple guards, when guards are sensitive because users conne
100% normal. Welcome to tor.
No, no clue why ;)
Markus
Sent from my iPad
> On 15 Sep 2016, at 18:12, Ralph Seichter wrote:
>
> When running two non-exit nodes, configured as a single family with no
> other members, and using identical bandwidth settings, is it to be
> expected that only one o
When running two non-exit nodes, configured as a single family with no
other members, and using identical bandwidth settings, is it to be
expected that only one of the nodes ever obtains the guard flag? The
node uptimes are pretty much the same as well, but consensus weight
differs significantly. I
Ivan Semenov:
> Hello, can I get some vanilla bridges pls
Go to https://bridges.torproject.org/ and select 'none' as Pluggable
Transport. Voila.
--
Ivan Markin
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-
Hello, can I get some vanilla bridges pls
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
25 matches
Mail list logo
