Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

2016-08-30 Thread teor
> On 31 Aug 2016, at 15:20, Chad MILLER wrote: > > But it can never look in your ~/.gnupg/ dir or grab your scanner or wipe your > yubikey or turn on your camera or whatever, as another program, rogue or > compromised, could do. None of that even seems to exist. If it shares physical RAM with

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

2016-08-30 Thread Chad MILLER
* Green Dream [2016-08-30 21:39:34 -0700]: chad> 1) anyone can create packages for others without review, 2) security is better These two concepts seem fundamentally at odds. Perhaps I have misunderstood you. How would unreviewed code be better for security? Good question. It's better beca

Re: [tor-relays] new relay package for Ubuntu 16.04+

2016-08-30 Thread Green Dream
Chad, > 1) anyone can create packages for others without review, 2) security is better These two concepts seem fundamentally at odds. Perhaps I have misunderstood you. How would unreviewed code be better for security? ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-rel

Re: [tor-relays] #torstrike

2016-08-30 Thread Green Dream
Well said grarpamp. > there are plenty of other already existing, interesting, and > upcoming anonymous overlay networks for transporting IP, messaging, > storage and so on. Mind sharing some names here so I can research further? ___ tor-relays mailing