Too bad when a Tor node operator is intimidated out of his activity.
I understand your position, thank you for your efforts.
Marco
stig atle steffensen wrote on 01/08/2016 08:15:
> I decided today to turn the node into a non-exit node this morning.
> The stress of not knowing if something will h
I decided today to turn the node into a non-exit node this morning.
The stress of not knowing if something will happen again is too much for
me to go around thinking about.
I will rather donate some to torproject or other exit operators.
On 31.07.2016 18.05, stig atle steffensen wrote:
> thank y
thank you, I have added the ones I did not already have to my
configuration now.
On 31.07.2016 17.58, Toralf Förster wrote:
> Well, maybe OT but nevertheless:
>
> The tor exit notice can be improved. I derived a good example from the
> WIKI and adapted it just a little bit for Germany: http://5.9.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Well, maybe OT but nevertheless:
The tor exit notice can be improved. I derived a good example from the WIKI and
adapted it just a little bit for Germany: http://5.9.158.75/
And a second thing: If you close port 465, then you should close 587 as w
But... it is still a free choice-Original Message-From: jonat...@bakerbates.comSent: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 14:54:21 +0100To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.orgSubject: Re: [tor-relays] Got a visit from the police this morning..I think this issue has been discussed here before. The general opi
On 07/31/2016 03:13 PM, Stig Atle Steffensen wrote:
> Anyone else here that has this happen to you recently as well?..
Not recently, no. Since 2010 we had (I think) two times police coming to
our registered address (which is a laywer's office). Sometimes they
call, sometimes they email, most of th
I do not run it from home, as you can see in my post.
So that was not the issue.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 09:04:48AM -0500, Tristan wrote:
> Except that if you do it right, you get a high speed unlimited bandwidth
> relay.
>
> On Jul 31, 2016 9:03 AM, "Jonathan Baker-Bates"
> wrote:
>
> > I thin
Except that if you do it right, you get a high speed unlimited bandwidth
relay.
On Jul 31, 2016 9:03 AM, "Jonathan Baker-Bates"
wrote:
> I think this issue has been discussed here before.
>
> The general opinion on the list is that it's not a good idea to run an
> exit at home. It's probably not
I think this issue has been discussed here before.
The general opinion on the list is that it's not a good idea to run an exit
at home. It's probably not worth the hassle.
On 31 July 2016 at 14:13, Stig Atle Steffensen
wrote:
> I never thought I would be one of those operators who had to deal
I never thought I would be one of those operators who had to deal with the
police or anything like that.
I've done all I can to set things up so that it's easy to see that I run a exit
node.
I have a disclaimer on my website :
https://stigatle.no/index.php/tor-exit-node/
and if you go to the i
10 matches
Mail list logo
