> On 18 Dec 2015, at 02:03, Logforme wrote:
>
> My relay, Logforme (855BC2DABE24C861CD887DB9B2E950424B49FC34), is not on
> the list even though it fits all the criteria, except the HSDir flag
> which I lost when I upgraded to the latest version.
> Hint, hint, Mr Roger "We should somehow teach ev
On Tuesday, June 21, 2016 09:52:43 AM Tristan wrote:
> But the point of Tor is to promote open access to the Internet. Once Tor
> starts filtering traffic, it's no better than the government censorship so
> many people use Tor to get around. They'd go from one filter to another.
This is not such a
> On 12 Jun 2016, at 03:10, Brian Kroll wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I had a weird event happen where the fingerprint of my relay changed
> after updates to the OS.
It sounds like your data directory was either erased, or configured to be a
different directory.
Did you make a backup before the upda
Exits are badly needed, but is it economically feasible to change to a
relay? Based on your cost, and the ISP attitude to a relay only, does it
make sense to be a relay instead - and still provide for the Tor community?
I would be curious also to know if many of the ISP's have a higher
level t
If you know your ISP, the best thing to do is try to schedule a face-to-face
meeting with their management and security personnel. Be prepared to explain
Tor, its essential function, and both the pros and cons of running an exit.
Then listen to their concerns, and try to address them. Ultimately
But the point of Tor is to promote open access to the Internet. Once Tor
starts filtering traffic, it's no better than the government censorship so
many people use Tor to get around. They'd go from one filter to another.
I understand your point, but I don't think we can accurately detect
malicious
If it is Tor philosophy to prevent criminal activity then should not tor
develop other tools apart from port and IP blocking? I am less certain that we
can ring our hands of this issue. We will have fewer and fewer exit nodes until
the gross attacks like multiple login attempts are restrained i
Jon, all others,
yes I understand what you say and obviously have to accept the ISP's
wishes (order).
But before giving up a 100Mbit/s exit I would like to understand more
about the ISP's reasons and burdens:
- is it just the more work for rather poor money handling(forwarding)
those abuses ?
-
On Jun 20, 2016, at 4:19 AM, pa011 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> thanks again for your hints - in my case they obviously find Tor less
> fancy - their response today is following:
>
> "Hello.
> You need to take steps to ensure that the complaint would be no longer
> received.
> This software is only a
