> Hi,
> I'm running a Tor relay which is working fine and a Tor Bridge Relay
> on port 995 (ORPort is 465) which is reachable from the outside that
> has been running for more than one month and has never been contacted
> by any client. I've tried to use it with Tor Browser from outside my
> own ne
Hi,
I'm running a Tor relay which is working fine and a Tor Bridge Relay on
port 995 (ORPort is 465) which is reachable from the outside that has
been running for more than one month and has never been contacted by any
client. I've tried to use it with Tor Browser from outside my own
network and it
I've found that utilization and consensus weight of relays is highly
variable, and the causes aren't always easy to pin down. There are a lot of
factors that can contribute. A few off the top of my head:
- CPU performance. AES-NI helps here. It seems unlikely this is your issue
if your CPU utiliza
Hey,
Have you checked the Atlas + Globe websites ? Using your 2 server's
fingerprints.
https://atlas.torproject.org/
https://globe.torproject.org/
On Atlas, you will find "Consensus Weight" with a number for your exit 1
and exit 2.
The higher the number is, the higher the server will be used on t
I would like to understand the working of two exit relays, one is about
7 days old -the other worked as a middle relay before and is an exit now
for about two weeks. The second one has a higher potential connection up
to 250 Mbit/s while the first is supposed to be limited on 100 Mbit/s.
They both
Sad to hear this. I was briefly part of the rewrite and I remember it
getting selected to be
part of google's summer of code.
I was under the impression that the it was running as I recently got a
tshirt email for my relay. I haven't had the opportunity to look at how the
new weather based on Oni
Hi Jason!
> On 04/04/16 16:48, Karsten Loesing wrote:
An unreliable notification system is worse than not
having a system at all. Relay operators shouldn't rely on Tor Weather
to notify them when their relay fails. They should rather set up
their own system instead.
> I found
Oi!
I found it extremely useful for notifications on my exits.
Is it safe to assume the code is FOSS and repo'd somewhere?
-Jason
On 6/2/2016 5:21 PM, Greg Moss wrote:
*Again, sorry for any inconvenience -
Oh no worries. No one used it anyway-
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [ma
*Again, sorry for any inconvenience -
Oh no worries. No one used it anyway-
-Original Message-
From: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] On Behalf
Of Karsten Loesing
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 7:56 AM
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear relay operators,
I learned today that Tor Weather is already offline since May 24 due
to problems with our hosting company.
We briefly thought about recreating it from backups, but it seems that
we'd rather spend that effort on other things.
Ag
Hi,
ansible-relayor is an ansible [1] role for tor relay operators.
Whether you setup/operate a single or many relays, ansible-relayor can
help you automate all steps including secure offline key [2] generation,
multi-instance setup and MyFamily management.
https://github.com/nusenu/ansible-rel
11 matches
Mail list logo
