For what it's worth process permissions aren't at play here. Arm is
failing to talk with the control port - permissions could cause us to
be unable to read the authentication cookie, but that would be a
different message.
Cheers! -Damian
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Manager Bahia del Sol LLC
No worries,Are you sure the user or group is debian_tor?The default is debian-tor in Ubuntu.If that isn't the problem,First I would be sure tor is actually running.toportop -u debian-torThe second will show if tor is actually running as the user you think it is.If it is, then see if it is listenin
Michael McConville wrote:
> David Schulz wrote:
> > Am 04.12.2015 20:12, schrieb Michael McConville:
> > >I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few
> > >experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I
> > >found arm a needless, breakable complication after the
David Schulz wrote:
> Am 04.12.2015 20:12, schrieb Michael McConville:
> >I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few
> >experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I found
> >arm a needless, breakable complication after the rush of running my
> >first relay w
Are you aware that you just wrote "write that sort of retort privately"
by not, yourself, writing your retort privately?
As to why I published my original reply to the list, it's because I felt
that other lurkers who are perhaps newbies to how open source support
listservs work might also bene
write that sort of retort privately
-Original Message-From: tor-am...@foofus.comSent: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:33:03 -0800To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.orgSubject: Re: [tor-relays] Unbelieveable
Believe it or not, Kurt, if you'd asked in your follow-up in anything resembling a nice or app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
He probably means viewing the total number of connections to and from
the relay. This is what I use munin for too: the total number of
connections and the total amount of incoming and outgoing bandwidth.
I use arm too to make me feel comfortable at
On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 20:15:18 +0100
David Schulz wrote:
> Do you got an alternative for arm? i use munin too, for connections etc.
"For connections"? Why do you ever need to view the actual connections from/to
your relay.
As alternatives to arm, when looking after a relay that's spinning up, I u
Do you got an alternative for arm? i use munin too, for connections etc.
Am 04.12.2015 20:12, schrieb Michael McConville:
I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few
experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I found
arm a needless, breakable complication
I suspect you're also getting few replies because relatively few
experienced relay operators use arm. That's only a guess, but I found
arm a needless, breakable complication after the rush of running my
first relay wore off.
It is fun to use and useful to beginners, though. :-) No disrespect to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/4/2015 10:33 AM, AMuse wrote:
> Believe it or not, Kurt, if you'd asked in your follow-up in
> anything resembling a nice or appreciative tone, I'd have helped
> you. I'm on too many email lists and things get buried sometimes,
> so I didn't see
Believe it or not, Kurt, if you'd asked in your follow-up in anything
resembling a nice or appreciative tone, I'd have helped you. I'm on too
many email lists and things get buried sometimes, so I didn't see any of
your original requests. I had a few minutes today where I could have
chatted with
He is right.
Do you want help now or what?
Am 04.12.2015 um 19:21 schrieb Kurt Besig:
> On 12/4/2015 9:29 AM, AMuse wrote:
> > Looks like you got more than you paid for.
>
>
>
> > On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote:
>
> > That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a
> > fair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/4/2015 9:29 AM, AMuse wrote:
> Looks like you got more than you paid for.
>
>
>
> On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote:
>
> That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a
> fairly simple, I thought, CntrolPort question on
On Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:29:58 -0800
AMuse allegedly wrote:
>
>
> Looks like you got more than you paid for.
>
> On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a
> > fairly
>>> Doesn't Arm look for 9051?
>>
>> By default, but it can be any port you edit into the rc.
>
> Apologies for the rudimentary question but did you try 'arm
> --interface 9051'? I assume by 'edit into the rc' that you've changed
> the default via the armrc but if I was in your shoes I'd give the
>
>> Doesn't Arm look for 9051?
>
> By default, but it can be any port you edit into the rc.
Apologies for the rudimentary question but did you try 'arm
--interface 9051'? I assume by 'edit into the rc' that you've changed
the default via the armrc but if I was in your shoes I'd give the
interface a
Looks like you got more than you paid for.
On 2015-12-03 18:46, Kurt Besig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> That I got two responses after posting to tor-relays regarding a
> fairly simple, I thought, CntrolPort question on a new VPS relay..
> That's pathetic. Th
Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2015 08:57 schrieb Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner
:
Have you restarted
Tor after you made changes?
Yes. After ive done changes i always restart the Server hard. Tor is
Running As Daemon so hours after restart i just do a check at
atlas.torproject.org if its up&running
19 matches
Mail list logo
