On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 05:28:07 +
isis wrote:
[snip]
> Somehow, possibly due to one of the above-mentioned bugs, your tor and
> BridgeDB both seem to think that you're *only* listening on IPv4… so
> I'm a bit confused by what netstat is telling you…
It's a Linux-ism. Binding to [::] will bind t
Tom Ritter transcribed 2.8K bytes:
> Earlier this month I set up an obfs3/obfs4 bridge that (as far as I
> can tell) has never been used. Is this normal? My bridge is at
> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/C184F644B9D39B26647779282003ACAF59E8028A
>
Your bridge is in BridgeDB, and it's alloca
On 06/01/2015 08:12 PM, tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> hi,
> is that IPv6 adress valid for example "becks" [2a01:4f8:162:7345::2]?
> how do i know if IPv6 is correct and reachable?
> thanks
>
http://www.subnetonline.com/pages/ipv6-network-tools/online-ipv6-port-scanner.php?input=
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:12:29 +0200
tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com wrote:
> hi,
> is that IPv6 adress valid for example "becks" [2a01:4f8:162:7345::2]?
> how do i know if IPv6 is correct and reachable?
> thanks
Yes this one is correct and reachable.
You can check yourself by running on any I
On Monday, June 1, 2015 1:28pm, "Roman Mamedov" said:
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 13:23:34 -0400 (EDT)
> "Steve Snyder" wrote:
>
>> >2) Testing
>> >How do I (easily) confirm my bridge is correctly configured?
>> >Especially if I don't have an IPv6 connection for TBB?
>>
>> FYI, you can get up to 5 I
Use ping6, Luke
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015, 21:12 wrote:
> hi,
> is that IPv6 adress valid for example "becks" [2a01:4f8:162:7345::2]?
> how do i know if IPv6 is correct and reachable?
> thanks
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.o
hi,
is that IPv6 adress valid for example "becks" [2a01:4f8:162:7345::2]?
how do i know if IPv6 is correct and reachable?
thanks
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 13:23:34 -0400 (EDT)
"Steve Snyder" wrote:
> >2) Testing
> >How do I (easily) confirm my bridge is correctly configured?
> >Especially if I don't have an IPv6 connection for TBB?
>
> FYI, you can get up to 5 IPv6 addresses for free from Hurricane Electric:
>
> https://tun
>2) Testing
>How do I (easily) confirm my bridge is correctly configured?
>Especially if I don't have an IPv6 connection for TBB?
FYI, you can get up to 5 IPv6 addresses for free from Hurricane Electric:
https://tunnelbroker.net/
That lets you tunnel IPv6 traffic when your ISP only offers IP
I set my bridge up using the guide at https://www.sky-ip.org/tutorials.html and
I have a steady flow of connections definitely visible via tor-arm.
On June 1, 2015 11:02:53 AM CDT, Tom Ritter wrote:
>Hrm. So this gets into the inner workings of the bwauth system which
>is... complicated.[0] Ho
Earlier this month I set up an obfs3/obfs4 bridge that (as far as I
can tell) has never been used. Is this normal? My bridge is at
https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/C184F644B9D39B26647779282003ACAF59E8028A
During this exercise I ran across a few pain points for setting up a
bridge. Maybe I
Hrm. So this gets into the inner workings of the bwauth system which
is... complicated.[0] Honestly, I'm not actually sure how the
individual data from the different bwauths is combined into a single
value for the consensus.
I'm not sure what the answer is for your problem, but I'm beginning to
w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I have to agree with that, multicore support is really important and
should be on the top of the priority list.
Thomas White:
> Have there been any updated ETAs concerning the development/support
> of multi-core for the core tor workloads? If not, i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Have there been any updated ETAs concerning the development/support of
multi-core for the core tor workloads? If not, is there anything in
particular that I could do to speed the process up? Scaling the
capabilities of the Tor process would be a huge r
14 matches
Mail list logo
