On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:43 AM, David Serrano wrote:
> On 2014-11-05 23:58:43 (-0500), grarpamp wrote:
>>
>> The real problem below is the 96% allocation of opensource to
>> Linux and 4% to Other opensource.
>
>> Someone should really do an analysis of platform vs. exit bandwidth
>> as well. Anyon
Update to the latest version of tor: 0.2.5.10
I believe that resolution was clearly stated here. And also mentioned in
the announcement of 0.2.5.10
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-02510-released-and-tor-023x-deprecated
"Downgrade the severity of the 'unexpected sendme cell from client' from
'w
Thanks for all the informative responses, they were truly underwhelming...
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:04:41AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> 173 FreeBSD
FreeBSD still seems to use globally incrementing IP IDs by default.
That's an issue as it leaks fine-grained information about how many
packets a relay's networking stack processes. (However, nobody
investigated the exact im
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/05/2014 04:04 AM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Libertas
> wrote:
>> I think it would be a good idea to add OpenBSD to doc/TUNING
>> because [...] promoting OpenBSD relays benefits the Tor network's
>> security.
>
> Absol
