On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 06:43:04PM +0200, Kees Goossens wrote:
> A question on how to manage a bandwidth quotum of my internet provider.
> I run a non-exit relay on a hosted server with 1000 GB bandwidth per month.
>
> In essence, should I
> A- only set the AccountingMax, and let the relay figure
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Jesse Victors
wrote:
> I run some relays and an exit in a university setting. The nodes are in the
> same /8 block and are physically close to one another as well. Is there any
> advantage in turning one of the relays into another exit? This is something
> that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well one thing to note is that setting a bandwidth rate means you
could significantly underutilise your bandwidth capabilities, as
opposed to an overall cap. Also to consider the bandwidth on offer, I
would personally set it to use as much bandwidth as
Dear all,
A question on how to manage a bandwidth quotum of my internet provider.
I run a non-exit relay on a hosted server with 1000 GB bandwidth per month.
In essence, should I
A- only set the AccountingMax, and let the relay figure out the
RelayBandwidthRate & RelayBandwidthBurst by itself
B
Hi Jesse,
On 08/26/2014 03:47 PM, Jesse Victors wrote:
> It seems to me that too many nodes under the same ISP is
> problematic because it concentrates too much traffic in
> the same AS, but on the other hand, Tor could use more exits.
> More importantly, how many is too many nodes in the same /8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Hey everyone,
I run some relays and an exit in a university setting. The nodes are in the
same /8 block and are physically close to one another as well. Is there any
advantage in turning one of the relays into another exit? This is something
th
