Hello Jodie,
Ah right, thank you, so advertised bandwidth and consensus weight are both
essentially other computers' assessment of the game relay's throughput, though
different computers and in different ways.
Thanks
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_
On 14-06-17 01:51 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Jonathan D. Proulx
> wrote:
>> I'm not sure if this was meant as a technical or aesthetic preference,
>> but I am curious. Is there any technical benefit to rounning a more
>> diverse set of opensource oprating systems for
Hello Kingqueen,
Advertised bandwidth as reported by atlas and globe is really what is
observed as of far. Your relay has only been up for four days, and as your
relay proves its reliability and speed, advertised bandwidth will go up.
Advertised bandwidth is not what you put in torrc. The bandwidt
THANK YOU
That is clear and consise and well needed.
Robert
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Hi
I'm running the new, imaginatively-nicknamed kingqueenbtnftw relay.
I have read around a lot but something I don't get. I thought advertised
bandwidth was what I'd put in torrc whereas consensus weight was what some
uber-machines tested my relay at, with the idea that this can foil disruptio
Hi
I'm running the new, imaginatively-nicknamed kingqueenbtnftw relay.
I have read around a lot but something I don't get. I thought advertised
bandwidth was what I'd put in torrc whereas consensus weight was what some
uber-machines tested my relay at, with the idea that this can foil disruptio
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Alexander Fortin
wrote:
>
> I’ve recently joined the Tor Project and I have been running a non exit relay
> for a few days.
>
> I’m also a Puppet user and, more in general, I try to make deploying
> applications
> on the servers I administer as easy as possibile,
On 06/17/2014 02:49 AM, Alex Jordan wrote:
>> In my dream
>> world, it would not only support Debian: Right now, most of the Tor
>> network runs on Debian, which is not ideal. We need more *BSD and
>> Solaris! And FreeDOS! :)
> Why is this not ideal? I'm not following.
> Also, do you mean Debian or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Yes, especially when hitting Enter after "sudo -u debian-tor arm"
Then it took a few seconds and the relay resumed.
It never seemed to have these problems when running on it's own, so I think
this is just due to the limited resources of the pi
Running top in a separate SSH session shows ~50% load average. I imagine
spikes would cause the CLI interruptions and maybe relay
unresponsive/resumed notices. Did you have the same blank uptime issue?
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Elrippo wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Had the same issues on my pi when running over ssh.
It simply is the fact, that your pi is running almost on max load. Type top in
your console, and watch the pi working :)
On 17. Juni 2014 19:28:23 MESZ, Adam Griffin wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Just started a
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote:
> I'm not sure if this was meant as a technical or aesthetic preference,
> but I am curious. Is there any technical benefit to rounning a more
> diverse set of opensource oprating systems for tor nodes? I discount
> closed source as we d
Hi,
Just started a new tor relay on my raspberry pi yesterday and I'm
monitoring with tor-arm over ssh. I'm currently listed on
atlas.torproject.org with flags 'Fast', 'Running', 'V2Dir', and 'Valid'
with > 17hrs uptime.
However, tor-arm is showing a blank for uptime and about once a minute, the
On 17. Juni 2014 at 17:26:42, Jonathan D. Proulx (j...@csail.mit.edu) wrote:
> I'm not sure if this was meant as a technical or aesthetic preference,
> but I am curious. Is there any technical benefit to rounning a more
> diverse set of opensource oprating systems for tor nodes? I discount
> closed
Hi All,
In the recent thread relating to Debian relay Puppet modules it was
suggested that a greater diversity of operating systems in tor nodes
wooudl be preferable.
I'm not sure if this was meant as a technical or aesthetic preference,
but I am curious. Is there any technical benefit to rounni
On 16. Juni 2014 at 08:56:20, Alexander Fortin (alexander.for...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> > You should never rely on short key IDs for anything. They can be forged
> > within minutes. When you look at
> > https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html
16 matches
Mail list logo
